Organic Letters
Letter
a
currently available methods still require the use of precious
transition metals including Ru- or Ir-based photoredox catalysts.
Additionally, one of the most serious problems is the lack of a
general and powerful synthetic protocol that permits the use of a
wide range of heteroatom nucleophiles.
Table 1. Screening of Reaction Conditions
Previously, we reported the organophotoredox-catalyzed
decarboxylative cross-coupling of aliphatic carboxylic acid
derived redox active esters and aliphatic alcohols (Scheme
1B).10,11 The reaction involves a SET from the excited state of
the phenothiazine (PTH) catalyst to a redox active ester,12
resulting in the formation of a PTH radical cation and an alkyl
radical, which is liberated from the redox active ester. The
resultant carbon centered-radical is oxidized by the PTH radical
cation to the corresponding carbocation intermediate (Scheme
1B, top), which couples with various heteroatom nucleophiles. It
was speculated whether the addition of the carbon-centered
radical to an alkene could be performed before the oxidation
process to accomplish three-component coupling (Scheme 1B,
bottom).13
Herein, we report a visible-light-mediated organophotoredox
catalysis process for vicinal difunctionalization of alkenes
(Scheme 1C). This protocol facilitates assembly, in a single
step, of aliphatic acid derived redox active esters, alkenes, and
various heteroatom nucleophiles, such as alcohols, water,
carboxylic acids, amides, and halogens, into densely function-
alized hydrocarbons.
The alkyletherification of styrenes was commenced with
aliphatic alcohols and aliphatic redox active esters. Previous
methods for alkyletherification of alkenes require the use of
excess amounts of alcohol nucleophiles (>5.0 equiv) and
transition metal catalysts.4f,5b,14 Additionally, the use of a tertiary
alcohol as a nucleophile is not well developed.5b,14a,b To address
these issues, the reaction conditions and scope of the substrates
were carefully evaluated. Based on a previous report,9 π-
extended benzo[b]phenothiazine derivatives were used as an
organophotoredox catalyst for this three-component coupling.
After a quick screening, the combination of PTH1, featuring a
benzo[b]phenothiazine core and a p-CF3-phenyl substituent on
the nitrogen, and LiBF4 was found to be best for the reaction
(Table 1, entry 1).15 The effect of the N-substituent of the
catalyst was next investigated. Use of H and OMe groups instead
of a CF3 group resulted in a slightly diminished product yield
(entries 2 and 3). PTH4 bearing a cyano group exhibited
comparable reactivity (entry 4). The representative Ir- or Ru-
based photoredox catalysts did not improve the product yield
(entries 5−8). PTH1 exhibited higher reactivity than PTH4
when the reaction time was shortened to 12 h (entries 9 and 10).
Finally, lowering the catalyst loading to 1 mol % and decreasing
the reaction time to 2 h did not affect the product yield (entry
11).
Using the optimal reaction conditions, the scope of each
ingredient was evaluated. First, the scope of the redox-active
esters was explored (Scheme 2, top). Dimethyl-based tertiary
redox-active esters having acetoxy and benzyloxy groups
afforded the corresponding dialkyl ethers in moderate yields
(4aab and 4aac). Additionally, a tertiary alkyl group containing
diethyl and cyano groups was introduced to the alkene (4aad).
1-Methylcyclopentyl and 1-methylcyclohexyl substituents were
efficiently incorporated (4aae and 4aaf). A heteroatom-fused
aliphatic ring system was amenable to this three-component
coupling (4aag and 4aah). A sterically hindered adamantyl
redox active ester could participate in this reaction (4aai).
Secondary carboxylic acids were also found to be suitable alkyl
a
The reaction was carried out with 1a (0.6 mmol), 2a (0.4 mmol), 3a
(0.2 mmol), PTH (0.02 mmol), and LiBF4 (0.02 mmol) in MeCN
b
(0.6 mL) under blue LED irradiation for 24 h. 1H NMR yield based
on 3a. Yield of the isolated product is in parentheses. Reaction was
carried out with 1a (0.6 mmol), 2a (0.2 mmol), 3a (0.2 mmol),
PTH1 (0.002 mmol), and LiBF4 (0.002 mmol) in MeCN (0.6 mL)
under blue LED irradiation for 2 h.
c
sources (4aaj−4aal). Unfortunately, the reactions with primary
aliphatic redox-active esters did not afford any product (data not
shown). This might be due to inefficient formation of the alkyl
radical and slow radical addition to the alkenes.
The effect of various alcohol nucleophiles was examined
(Scheme 2, middle). A broad range of functional group
compatibility was observed with primary aliphatic alcohols.
Ester, alkyne, ether, amide, and alkyl bromide groups did not
inhibit the reaction (4baa−4faa). Benzyl ethers were obtained
in good yields (4gaa and 4haa). Although iodoarene is known to
be reduced by the PTH catalyst, the compound survived in this
system. Secondary aliphatic alcohols could also participate in
this reaction (4iaa−4laa). It is noteworthy that the reaction with
sterically hindered tertiary alcohols gave the desired dialkyl ether
in high yield (4maa−4oaa).
Next, functionalized vinyl arenes were investigated (Scheme
2, bottom). A p-methoxy substituent on the aromatic ring was
found to be compatible (4aba). Halogen substituents survived
under reaction conditions without reduction (4acc and 4adc).
m-Substituents did not inhibit the reaction (4aec). Dialkyl
ethers containing naphthalene and thiophene were obtained in
moderate yields (4afa and 4agc). When α-methyl or phenyl
styrenes were subjected to the optimal reaction conditions, the
corresponding tertiary benzylic dialkyl ethers were obtained
(4ahc and 4dia). When cinnamyl ester was used, regio- and
diastereoselective C(sp3)−C(sp3) and C(sp3)−O bond for-
mation occurred to provide the synthetically valuable β-
1799
Org. Lett. 2021, 23, 1798−1803