296
L. El Kaïm et al.
LETTER
N
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
Cy
N
P(OEt)3
H
n-PrNH2
TMSN3
(5 equiv)
MeOH
Cy
n-Pr
+
NO2
CyNC
N
DMF (2 M)
140 °C, 10 h
70%
r.t., 12 h
78%
H
N
n-Pr
N
2a
NO2
1a
Scheme 2 Two-step formation of indazoles
We next examined the one-pot version of this sequence. tial molecular diversity are of high interest.10 In this case,
After the Ugi reaction, the residual methanol was evapo- tetrazolyl indazole have been obtained by a one-pot pro-
rated before introducing DMF and the phosphite required cedure involving two N–N bond formations as key steps.
for the next step. Under these conditions, compound 2a
could be isolated in 62% yield over two steps. Various
isocyanides and amines behave similarly, as shown by the
Acknowledgment
S.R.P. thanks the ANR-CP2D Program (ANR MUSE) for a post-
doctoral fellowship.
results gathered in Table 1.
Table 1 One-Pot Tetrazolyl Indazole Formation
O
References and Notes
N
N
N
N
R1NH2
TMSN3
1) MeOH (3 M)
r.t., 12 h
H
(1) For reviews concerning Ugi couplings, see: (a) Zhu, J. Eur.
J. Org. Chem. 2003, 1133. (b) Ugi, I.; Werner, B.; Dömling,
A. Molecules 2003, 8, 53. (c) Hulme, C.; Gore, V. Curr.
Med. Chem. 2003, 10, 51. (d) Bienaymé, H.; Hulme, C.;
Oddon, G.; Schmitt, P. Chem. Eur. J. 2000, 6, 3321.
(e) Dömling, A.; Ugi, I. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2000, 39,
3168. (f) Dömling, A. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 17.
(g) El Kaïm, L.; Grimaud, L. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 2153.
(2) For a selection of studies involving Ugi–Smiles couplings,
see: (a) El Kaïm, L.; Grimaud, L.; Oble, J. Angew. Chem.
Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 7961. (b) El Kaïm, L.; Gizolme, M.;
Grimaud, L.; Oble, J. J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 4169.
(c) El Kaïm, L.; Grimaud, L.; Gizzi, M. Org. Lett. 2008, 10,
3417. (d) Coffinier, D.; El Kaïm, L.; Grimaud, L. Org. Lett.
2009, 11, 995. (e) El Kaïm, L.; Grimaud, L.; Wagschal, S.
J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 5343. (f) El Kaïm, L.; Grimaud, L.;
Wagschal, S. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 1887.
R2
+
NO2
2) P(OEt)3 (5 equiv)
DMF (2 M)
140 °C, 10 h
N
R1
R2NC
N
2
Entry R1
R2
Product (yield)
2a (62%)
2b (62%)
2c (60%)
2d (24%)
2e (54%)
2f (65%)
1
2
n-Pr
t-Bu
t-Bu
Cy
4-MeOC6H4CH2
Cy
3
4
3,4-Me2C6H3
t-Bu
4-MeOC6H4CH2
t-Bu
5
6
Cy
4-MeOC6H4CH2
t-Bu
(3) El Kaim, L.; Grimaud, L.; Purumandla, S. R. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2011, 6177.
7
Cy
2g (48%)
2h (59%)
2i (46%))
(4) For reviews on the reaction of phosphites with nitroarenes,
see: (a) Cadogan, J. I. G. Acc. Chem. Res. 1972, 5, 303.
(b) Söderberg, B. C. G. Curr. Org. Chem. 2000, 4, 727.
For a selection involving N–N bond formation, see:
(c) Cadogan, J. I. G.; Cameron-Wood, M.; Mackie, R. K.;
Searle, R. J. G. J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 4831. (d) Nyffenegger,
C.; Pasquinet, E.; Suzenet, F.; Poullain, D.; Jarry, C.; Leger,
J.-M.; Guillaumet, G. Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 9567.
(5) (a) Ugi, I. Angew. Chem. 1960, 72, 639. (b) Ugi, I.;
Steinbrückner, C. Chem. Ber. 1961, 94, 734. (c) See also
reviews in ref. 1.
8
i-Pent
Cy
9
t-Oct
4-ClC6H4CH2
10
11
12
Cy
4,3-(MeO)2C6H3(CH2)2 2j (44%)
MeO(CH2)2
4-ClC6H4CH2
Cy
2k (57%)
2l (49%)
4-MeOC6H4CH2
(6) (a) Paal, C.; Fritzweiler, E. Ber. 1892, 25, 3590. (b) Kumar,
R.; Maulik, P. R.; Kundu, B. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1525.
(c) Frontana-Uribe, B. A.; Moinet, C. Acta Chem. Scand.
1999, 53, 814. (d) Reddy, V. R. K.; Reddy, S. N.; Ratnam,
C. V. Synth. Commun. 1991, 21, 49. (e) Stanley, A. L.;
Stanford, S. P. J. Heteroatom. Chem. 1994, 31, 1399.
(7) (a) Johnston, D.; Smith, D. M.; Shepherd, T.; Thompson, D.
J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 1 1987, 495. (b) Avila, B.;
Solano, D. M.; Haddadin, M. J.; Kurth, M. J. Org Lett. 2011,
13, 1060.
(8) General Procedure for the Synthesis of Indazoles: To a 3
M solution of o-nitrobenzaldehyde (1 mmol) in MeOH were
added successively amine (1.0 equiv), isocyanide (1.0 equiv)
and trimethylsilyl azide (1.0 equiv). The resulting mixture
was stirred at r.t. overnight. After removal of the excess
The sequence turned out to be efficient even for sterically
hindered amines, as a tert-octyl group only led to a slight
decrease in yields (entry 9). Compared to aliphatic
amines, anilines gave sluggish indazole formation (entry
4). In this case, the lower nucleophilicity of the nitrogen
atom of the aniline is probably responsible for a less effi-
cient N–N bond formation and further reduction of the ni-
troso to nitrene intermediates.4
In conclusion, we have extended the scope of Ugi-azide
couplings with the disclosure of a new postcondensation
towards indazoles.8 These heterocycles represent privi-
leged medicinal scaffolds9 and new syntheses with poten-
Synlett 2012, 23, 295–297
© Thieme Stuttgart · New York