were less effective than PPh3 (Table 1, entries 2–4) while
electron-rich triarylphosphines gave the product in similar
yields (entries 5 and 6). On the contrary, an electron-deficient
ligand resulted in a poor yield (entry 7). Decreasing the
amount of ligand to 12 mol% did not affect the reaction
(entry 8), while a low reaction rate was observed when the
amount of ligand was increased to 30 mol% (entry 9).
Decreasing the amount of Ni(cod)2 to 5 mol% did not lower
the yield (entry 10). Finally, we found that the use of 3 equiv.
of 2a drastically improved the yield and 3aa was obtained in a
yield of 84% (entry 11).
methoxy group or fluorine also reacted stereoselectively to
afford arene 3 (entries 14 and 15). However, terminal alkynes
failed to participate in the reaction. As shown in Scheme 3, the
[4+2] cycloaddition of (E)-isomer 4a with alkyne 2a also
resulted in 3aa with a yield of 83%.
We propose the reaction mechanism of the [4+2] cyclo-
addition as shown in Scheme 4. The reaction is initiated by the
coordination of two double bonds of diene 1 and alkyne 2 to
nickel(0). Although 1 and (E)-isomer 4 are in an equilibrium,
less sterically hindered 1 would give intermediate 5. Sub-
sequent oxidative cyclization and reductive elimination give
cyclohexadiene 7 and regenerate the starting nickel(0) catalyst.
Then, the aromatization of 7 affords arene 3.
With the optimized reaction conditions in hand, we examined
the substrate scope of this cycloaddition reaction (Table 2).
Dienes with an aryl substituent at R1 were effective participants.
In the reactions of methoxyphenyl-substituted dienes 1b and 1c,
deactivation of the nickel catalyst was observed. This was
prevented by using 10 mol% of phosphine ligand (Table 2,
entries 1 and 2). Among the aryl-groups that we examined, the
electron-deficient groups afforded aromatized cycloadduct 3 in
higher yields (entries 3 and 4). The sterically bulky o-tolyl
and 1-naphthyl groups also participated in the cycloaddition
(entries 5 and 6). Various internal alkynes were also examined
for their reactivity. Alkyl-substituted symmetrical alkynes 2b
and 2c reacted with 1a to afford 3ab and 3ac in good yields
(Table 2, entries 7 and 8). The reaction with cycloalkynes gave
ring-fused arenes. Whereas strained 12-membered cycloalkyne
2d resulted in a relatively low yield (entry 9), less strained
cyclopentadecyne (2e) gave arene 3ae in a yield of 81%. Of
note, the aromatizing step of this reaction was time intensive
(entry 10). Unsymmetrical alkyne 2f gave two corresponding
regioisomers in a yield of 61% but its selectivity was low
(entry 11). Aryl-substituted alkynes also participated in the
[4+2] cycloaddition. Diphenylacetylene (2g) reacted with diene
1h to afford 3hg in a yield of 56% (entry 12). Although two
regioisomers were possible outcomes in the reaction with
1-phenyl-1-propyne (2h), the product was obtained as a single
isomer (entry 13). Similar unsymmetrical alkyne bearing a
In conclusion, we developed a nickel-catalyzed [4+2] cyclo-
addition reaction that centers on electron-deficient dienes with
alkynes. This reaction corresponds to an inverse electron-
demand Diels–Alder reaction. In addition, subsequent aroma-
tization by using a base in air produces highly functionalized
arenes. Activation of both olefins of the diene is essential for
the cycloaddition reaction.
Notes and references
1 (a) H. Horie, T. Kurahashi and S. Matsubara, Chem. Commun.,
2010, 46, 7229; (b) H. Horie, I. Koyama, T. Kurahashi and
S. Matsubara, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 2658.
2 (a) I. Koyama, T. Kurahashi and S. Matsubara, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2009, 131, 1350. The reaction of a,b,g,d-unsaturated ketones
with alkynes afforded bicyclo[3.1.0]hexene; (b) H. Horie,
T. Kurahashi and S. Matsubara, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2011,
123, 9118.
3 For iron-catalyzed [4+2] cycloaddition, see: (a) A. Carbonaro,
A. Greco and G. Dall’Asta, J. Org. Chem., 1968, 33, 3948;
(b) J. P. Genet and J. Ficini, Tetrahedron Lett., 1979, 20, 1499;
(c) H. Tom Dieck and R. Diercks, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl.,
1983, 22, 778.
4 For rhodium-catalyzed [4+2] cycloaddition, see: (a) I. Matsuda,
M. Shibata, S. Sato and Y. Izumi, Tetrahedron Lett., 1987,
28, 3361; (b) R. S. Jolly, G. Luedtke, D. Sheehan and
T. Livinghouse, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 4965;
(c) M. Murakami, M. Ubukata, K. Itami and Y. Ito, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 1998, 37, 2248; (d) S.-J. Paik, S. U. Son and
Y. K. Chung, Org. Lett., 1999, 1, 2045; (e) D. Motoda,
H. Kinoshita, H. Shinokubo and K. Oshima, Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed., 2004, 43, 1860; (f) W.-J. Yoo, A. Allen, K. Villeneuve and
W. Tam, Org. Lett., 2005, 7, 5853; (g) A. Saito, T. Ono,
A. Takahashi, T. Taguchi and Y. Hanzawa, Tetrahedron Lett.,
2006, 47, 891.
5 For nickel-catalyzed [4+2] cycloaddition, see: (a) P. A. Wender
and T. E. Jenkins, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 6432;
(b) P. A. Wender and T. E. Smith, Tetrahedron, 1998, 54, 1255.
6 For cobalt-catalyzed [4+2] cycloaddition, see: (a) G. Hilt and
F.-X. du Mesnil, Tetrahedron Lett., 2000, 41, 6757; (b) G. Hilt
and T. J. Korn, Tetrahedron Lett., 2001, 42, 2783. See also following
review: (c) W. Hess, J. Treutwein and G. Hilt, Synthesis, 2008, 3537.
7 For other transition-metal-catalyzed [4+2] cycloaddition, see the
Scheme 3 Reaction of (E)-isomer 4a with alkyne 2a.
following. Ti: (a) K. Mach, H. Antropiusova, L. Petrusova,
´ ´
F. Turecek and V. Hanus, J. Organomet. Chem., 1985, 289, 331.
Pd: (b) K. Kumar and R. S. Jolly, Tetrahedron Lett., 1998,
39, 3047. Cu and Au: (c) A. Furstner and C. C. Stimson, Angew.
¨
Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 8845. Au: (d) S. M. Kim, J. H. Park and
Y. K. Chung, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 6719.
8 (a) P. A. Wender and T. E. Smith, J. Org. Chem., 1996, 61, 824;
(b) G. Hilt, J. Janikowsky and W. Hess, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2006, 45, 5204; (c) G. Hilt and M. Danz, Synthesis, 2008, 2257.
9 For reviews on preparation of arenes via [4+2] cycloaddition, see:
(a) V. Gevorgyan and Y. Yamamoto, J. Organomet. Chem., 1999,
576, 232; (b) S. Saito and Y. Yamamoto, Chem. Rev., 2000,
100, 2901.
Scheme 4 Plausible reaction mechanism.
10 S. Ikeda, N. Mori and Y. Sato, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1997, 119, 4779.
c
3868 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 3866–3868
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012