M.S. Refat, N.M. El-Metwaly / Spectrochimica Acta Part A 92 (2012) 336–346
339
of ꢀ(C N) and ␦(NH) bands. Also, an intense band at 1607 cm−1
3.2. Molar conductivity measurements
assigned for ꢀ(C O) of two similar amide groups. A deliberate com-
parison between the spectra of investigated complexes with the
spectrum of free ligand reflects the mode of coordination of the
ligand towards metal ions. The IR spectrum of Mn(II)–H2L1 com-
plex shows the following bands suffer shifts in appearance due to
the coordination of all active sites. A broad band at ≈3425 cm−1
assigned to ꢀOH of coordinated water molecules although the
proposal of deprotonation of OH group in the ligand molecule
during its covalent attachment with one central atom. The lower
shift of ꢀNH band and the thioamide bands especially the fourth
ꢀ(C S) (750 cm−1) proposed their participation in coordination.
Also, the lower appearance of a band at 1525 cm−1 assigned for
ꢀ(C N) group offers the fourth coordination site. The lower appear-
ance of intense ꢀ(C O) bands at 1596 cm−1 offers the fifth and
sixth coordination sites. The binuclear presence of Mn(II) permit
the coordination of all active sites of the ligand which shows a
mononegative polydentate mode towards the two central atoms.
The IR spectrum of Cu(II)–H2L1 complex displays the following
more or less unshifted bands: 3452, 3256 and 1603 assigned for
ꢀOH, ꢀNH and ꢀ(C O). The appearance of new band at 1590 cm−1
assigned for the coordinated C O group in-between the two amides
in phthalic anhydride. Also, the lower shift observed with ꢀ(C S)
bands proposed its interaction with central atom by a coordinate
bond. The ligand coordinates towards Cu(II) as neutral bidentate
through C O and C S groups. The different interaction mode of
the H2L1 towards Cu(II) and Mn(II), due to the different coor-
dination media pH. The use of ammonia drops to isolated the
Mn(II) complex facilitate the ionization of the ligand through OH
group during the coordination. The IR spectrum of H2L2 ligand
displays the following significant bands at: 3443, 3319, 1489,
1365, 1538 and 1613 cm−1 assigned for ꢀOH, ꢀNH, ␦NH, ␦OH,
ꢀC N and ꢀC O. Also, other additive bands at 1464, 1267, 1110
and 774 cm−1 for thioamide group. This appearance also, sup-
ports the presence of the free ligand in keto-thione form. The
IR spectrum of Mn(II)–H2L2 complex displays the same signifi-
cant bands suffer little affect although the proposal of their ruling
out from coordination with central atom as: 3441, 3286, 1600
and 1538 cm−1 assigned for ꢀOH, ꢀNH, ꢀC O and ꢀC N. The
bands suffer changes in their position at 1490, 1292, 1120 and
732 cm−1 assigned for thioamide group coordinated with cen-
tral atom. This is proven through the higher appearance of first
three bands but the lower appearance of the fourth is consid-
ered the major measure of C S coordination. The appearance of
new band at 1590 cm−1 assigned for coordinated C O group in
between two amides. The ligand coordinates towards Mn(II) as
neutral tridentate through one amide and C S groups. The spec-
trum of Cu(II)–H2L2 complex displays these bands at 3449, 3321,
1492 and 1540 cm−1 assigned for ꢀOH, ꢀNH, ␦NH and ꢀC N bands
which suffer higher and lower shift. Other bands at 1469, 1260,
1128 and 732 cm−1 for stretching thioamide bands suffer little
lower shift except the fourth suffers a strong lower shift coher-
ently with the proposal of its coordination. The ligand coordinates
towards two Cu(II) as neutral polydentate mode through all its
active sites. The lower appearance of all significant bands in the two
free ligands (H2L1 and H2L2) may reflect the presence of intraligand
H-bonding which, is normally found especially with the presence
of condensed highly electronegative sites. Also, a higher or a lit-
tle lower shift observed with some bands assigned for groups
sometimes are completely sided from coordination media due to
the decomposition of intra ligand H-bonding during the coordi-
nation only. The new bands appeared in lower frequency region
assigned for M–L bands with O, N and S atoms are well charac-
terized. The M–Cl cannot easily detect in this scanning range but
proposed based on elemental analysis and conductivity measure-
ments.
The molar conductivity values of Mn(II)–H2L1, Cu(II)–H2L1 and
Mn(II)–H2L2 complexes (Table 1) were found to be in the range
of 15–24 ꢁ2 cm−1 mol−1. These relatively low values indicate the
non-electrolytic nature of these complexes [12]. The neutrality of
the complexes can be accounted by both the deprotonated nature of
the ligand with most complexes and the attaching of Cl covalently
the metal ions. The Cu(II)–H2L2 complex is the only displaying
higher conductivity value (117 ꢁ2 cm−1 mol−1) referring to 1:2
electrolyte in between the coordination sphere and the chloride
ions [13].
3.3. Electronic spectra and magnetic measurements
A comparison of the electronic spectra of the free ligands with
those of their corresponding metal complexes show some shifts
that can be considered as evidence for the complex formation.
These bands appeared in neutral medium for the free ligands at
≈350 and ≈270 nm. These bands may be attributed to n → *
and → * transitions inside the ligands function groups. Addi-
tionally, the absorption spectra (in DMSO) of metal complexes
show additive bands at different wave lengths. Each one is cor-
responding to certain transition, which suggests the geometry of
the complexes and supported by the magnetic susceptibility val-
ues. The tentative assignments of the significant electronic spectral
absorption bands of H2L1 and H2L2 with their Mn(II) and Cu(II)
complexes as well as their ꢂeff values are given in Table 3. The
absorption spectra of Mn(II)–H2L1 and Mn(II)–H2L2 complexes
display weak absorption bands at; 22,222, 27,778 and 34,482
also; 21,739, 28,571 and 35,088 cm−1 in each complex, respec-
6
4
6
4
bands may be assigned as A1g → E1g
and 6A1g → T1g(4P) transitions, respectively [14,15]. According to
the d5 electronic configuration of Mn(II) an effective magnetic
moment for high spin complexes is expected to be 6.0 BM. Mea-
sured magnetic moments (Table 3) are 5.86 and 5.88 BM confirm
the octahedral environment for the Mn(II) with five unpaired elec-
trons in the two complexes. The electronic spectra of Cu(II)–H2L1
and Cu(II)–H2L2 complexes exhibit two bands as; an asymmetric
broad band at 16,666 and 15,285 cm−1, respectively and a more
intense band at 22,222 and 24,390 cm−1. The latter band may be
assigned to ligand–metal charge transfer transition. The asymmet-
4
ric band is assigned to the transition 2T2g → Eg. The band position
2
and the magnetic moment values (1.76 and 1.02 BM) can be taken
as evidence for the square–planar configuration (Fig. 3) [16]. The
first value (1.76 BM) was found in the usual range for d9 system and
indicating no direct interaction between central atoms in neighbor-
ing molecules, but the second one (1.02 BM) is lower than normal.
This is may be due to a strong interaction between the two central
atoms contribute in the same complex nucleus.
A literature survey reveals that the NMR spectroscopy has been
proved useful in establishing the structure and nature of many
ligands and their diamagnetic complexes. The 1H NMR spectra
(Fig. 4a–c) were recorded in d6-dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO-d6) solu-
tion using Me4Si (TMS) as internal standard. The proton magnetic
resonance spectrum of H2DDCA shows the existence of it in its
enolic form. This may be due to the higher polarity over the hall
molecule. 1H NMR (ppm) ı = 2.50 (DMSO); 7.40–8.20 (m, 4H, C6H4);
9.40 (s, 2H, NH2) and 10.4 ppm (s, 1H, OH). The 1H NMR spectra
of H2L1 and H2L2 ligands show a singlet signals at ı = 11.42 and
11.39 ppm due to OH [17] and signals at ı = 10.23 and 9.89 ppm (s,
1H) can be assigned to NH proton. The multiplets at ı = 6.79–8.31