methanolysis of the nerve agent simulant PNPDPP. While
the absolute turnover numbers are still quite modest when
directly compared to the kcat’s reported for PTEs,11 the
advantage of our highly modular synthetic approach is its
facile scope for tuning the many design parameters available,
thus influencing the catalytic rate in a single synthetic enzyme
cavity. For our small dimers, where a 1 : 1 substrate/cavity
binding stoichiometry was observed (Section XII in ESIw),16
the most critical factors for enhanced catalysis are Lewis acid
activation and the presence of Al–OMe centers (Sections IX
and XII in ESIw). This combination of supramolecular
encapsulation and activation resembles the molecular organi-
zation features in some enzymes and points to the vast
potential that mimicking biological designs can bring to
supramolecular catalysis, without being limited by the narrow
activity range defined by biological pHs.10
Fig. 2 Reaction profiles for the methanolysis of PNPDPP carried
out in the absence or presence of 3 mol% of unsat-Al2–Al2 or
unsat-Zn2–Zn2.
monomer, which in turn is 5 times faster than the uncatalyzed
reaction, points to the advantage of having Lewis acid activa-
tion and cavity encapsulation operating in concert. Lewis acid
activation is clearly essential for catalysis, as the free base
dimer, unsat-H21–H21, only elicits a reaction rate similar to
that for the uncatalyzed reaction.
This material is based upon research sponsored by the
AFOSR under agreement FA-9550-07-1-0534. We acknowledge
DTRA (grant HDTRA1-10-1-0023) and the DoE (grant
DE-FG02-03ER15457) for additional financial support.
Notes and references
The importance of having cavity-localized methoxide
nucleophiles is clearly demonstrated by the increased reaction
rates observed when the Zn centers in sat-Zn1–Zn1 are
successively replaced with Al–OMe groups (Table 1, cf. entries
1, 3, and 4). Thus, we were intrigued about the possibility of
tuning the electronic properties of the metalloporphyrin to
further enhance the nucleophilicity of the methoxide ions and
catalysis. To accomplish this, we replaced the 3,5-di-tbutyl aryl
substituents on unsat-Al1–Al1 with Si(hex)3-protected alkynyl
groups (Fig. 2). We reasoned that the delocalization of the
porphyrin electron density into a silyl-protected acetylene
would better stabilize partial positive charge on the Al center,
making it more Lewis acidic and the ꢀOMe anion more
nucleophilic,15 both of which would enhance catalysis. Indeed,
CHELPG calculations show that the partial charge separation
between Al and OMe is greater for a porphyrin bearing 10,20-
(CRCSi(hex)3) groups (ꢀOMe: ꢀ0.653 e, Al: 1.248 e)
compared to an analogous porphyrin with 3,5-di-tbutyl aryl
substituents (ꢀOMe: ꢀ0.645 e, Al: 1.189 e).
1 I. Beletskaya, V. S. Tyurin, A. Y. Tsivadze, R. Guilard and
C. Stern, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 1659–1713.
2 (a) Y. Nakamura, N. Aratani and A. Osuka, Chem. Soc. Rev.,
2007, 36, 831–845; (b) D. Holten, D. F. Bocian and J. S. Lindsey,
Acc. Chem. Res., 2001, 35, 57–69.
3 G. M. Mamardashvili, N. G. Mamardashvili and O. I. Koifman,
Russ. Chem. Rev., 2005, 74, 765–780.
4 C. M. Drain, A. Varotto and I. Radivojevic, Chem. Rev., 2009,
109, 1630–1658.
5 K. Tashiro and T. Aida, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2007, 36, 189–197.
6 (a) M. Nakash and J. K. M. Sanders, J. Org. Chem., 2000, 65,
7266–7271; (b) K. Tashiro, T. Aida, J.-Y. Zheng, K. Kinbara,
K. Saigo, S. Sakamoto and K. Yamaguchi, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1999, 121, 9477–9478.
7 (a) M. Nakash, Z. Clyde-Watson, N. Feeder, J. E. Davies,
S. J. Teat and J. K. M. Sanders, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2000, 122,
5286–5293; (b) L. G. Mackay, R. S. Wylie and J. K. M. Sanders,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1994, 116, 3141–3142.
8 G. M. Whitesides, J. P. Mathias and C. T. Seto, Science, 1991, 254,
1312–1319.
9 V. Kral, K. Lang, J. Kralova, M. Dvorak, P. Martasek,
´ ´ ´ ´ ´
A. O. Chin, A. Andrievsky, V. Lynch and J. L. Sessler, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 432–437.
10 B. M. Smith, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2008, 37, 470–478.
11 K.-Y. Wong and J. Gao, Biochemistry, 2007, 46, 13352–13369.
12 K.-T. Youm, S. T. Nguyen and J. T. Hupp, Chem. Commun., 2008,
3375–3377.
13 (a) J. M. Bakker, S. J. Langford, M. J. Latter, K. A. Lee and
C. P. Woodward, Aust. J. Chem., 2005, 58, 757–761; (b) P. C. M.
van Gerven, J. A. A. W. Elemans, J. W. Gerritsen, S. Speller,
R. J. M. Nolte and A. E. Rowan, Chem. Commun., 2005,
3535–3537; (c) T. Ishida, Y. Morisaki and Y. Chujo, Tetrahedron
Lett., 2006, 47, 5265–5268.
14 H. Morales-Rojas and R. A. Moss, Chem. Rev., 2002, 102,
2497–2522.
15 (a) H. L. Anderson, Tetrahedron Lett., 1992, 33, 1101–1104;
(b) Z. Q. Wang, P. N. Day and R. Pachter, J. Chem. Phys.,
1998, 108, 2504–2510.
As shown in Fig. 2, unsat-Al2–Al2 is highly active for the
methanolysis of PNPDPP, engendering a rate that is over
1300 times the uncatalyzed rate and B7 times faster than
unsat-Al1–Al1. Along with a stronger ꢀOMe nucleophile, the
highly Lewis acidic Al–OMe centers in unsat-Al2–Al2 bind
PNPDPP more effectively, as observed from the 2-fold binding
constant increase of PNPDPP in unsat-Al2–Al2 (49 Mꢀ1) over
unsat-Al1–Al1 (25 Mꢀ1). Moreover, the presence of a solvo-
phobic encapsulation effect for PNPDPP is clearly demon-
strated by both Zn and Al dimers, which bind PNPDPP in
1 : 1 v/v CHCl3/MeOH at concentrations 15–50 times higher
than expected statistically (Section XII in ESIw).
16 A larger tetramer assembly can bind more than one substrate in its
cavity. See: B. Kang, J. W. Kurutz, K.-T. Youm, R. K. Totten,
J. T. Hupp and S. T. Nguyen, Chem. Sci., 2012, 3, DOI: 10.1039/
c2sc00950a.
In summary, we have demonstrated that covalently linked
hollow metalloporphyrin dimers possessing tunable Lewis
acidic metal sites can significantly increase the rate of
c
4180 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 4178–4180
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012