D. I. Lainé et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 3366–3369
3369
and low bioavailability; two properties considered desirable for a
drug delivered by inhalation.
In conclusion, a novel series of N-Endo tropane derivatives was
characterized as potent M3 mAChR antagonists. Kinetic washout
studies at the human M3 cloned receptor and in human bronchus
showed that analog 24 displayed slower reversibility at the mACh-
Rs than the parent molecule 1. This profile translated in a much
longer in vivo duration of action for 24 compared to 1. Taken to-
gether, these results suggest that the introduction of alkyl chains
on the tropane nitrogen of 1 has created a novel class of mAChR
antagonists with a better likelihood to achieve prolonged duration
of bronchodilation in humans. Further studies of these compounds
will be reported elsewhere.
Figure 2. Concentration-dependent shifts in ACh concentration response curve
after 90 min incubation with 24 and reversibility following a 180 min wash-out at
the human M3 receptor.
References and notes
1. Caulfield, M. P.; Birdsall, N. J. M. Pharmacol. Rev. 1998, 50, 279.
2. Eglen, R. M. Prog. Med. Chem. 2005, 43, 105.
3. Caulfield, M. P. Pharmacol. Ther. 1993, 58, 319.
4. Lee, A. M.; Jacoby, D. B.; Fryer, A. D. Cur. Opin. Pharmacol. 2001, 1, 223.
5. Barnes, P. J. Thorax 1989, 44, 161.
6. Gater, P. J.; Alabastar, V. J.; Piper, I. Pulm. Pharmacol. 1989, 2, 87.
7. Faulkner, D.; Fryer, A. D.; MacLagan, J. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1986, 88, 181.
8. Lammers, J.-W. J.; Minette, P.; McCusker, M.; Barnes, P. J. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis.
1989, 139, 446.
9. Hay, D. W. P. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 412.
10. Fryer, A. D.; Adamko, D. J.; Yost, B. L.; Jacoby, D. B. Life Sci. 1999, 64, 449.
11. Gross, J. N. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 533, 36.
12. Busch-Petersen, J.; Laine, D. I. Future Med. Chem. 2011, 3, 1623.
13. Wan, Z.; Laine, D. I.; Yan, H.; Zhu, C.; Widdowson, K. L.; Buckley, P. T.; Burman,
M.; Foley, J. J.; Sarau, H. M.; Schmidt, D. B.; Webb, E. F.; Belmonte, K. E.;
Palovich, M. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2009, 19, 4560.
14. Laine, D. I.; Wan, Z.; Yan, H.; Zhu, C.; Xie, H.; Fu, W.; Busch-Petersen, J.; Neipp,
C.; Davis, R.; Widdowson, K. L.; Blaney, F. E.; Foley, J.; Bacon, A. M.; Webb, E. F.;
Luttmann, M. A.; Burman, M. A.; Burman, M.; Sarau, H. M.; Salmon, M.;
Palovich, M. R.; Belmonte, K. E. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52, 5241.
15. Laine, D. I.; Xie, H.; Buffet, N.; Foley, J. J.; Buckey, P. T.; Webb, E. F.; Widdowson,
K. L.; Palovich, M. R.; Belmonte, K. E. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2007, 17, 6066.
16. Jin, J.; Wang, Y.; Shi, D.; Wang, F.; Davis, R. S.; Jin, Q.; Fu, W.; Foley, J. J.; Webb, E.
F.; Dehaas, C. J.; Berlanga, M.; Burman, M.; Sarau, H. M.; Morrow, D. M.; Rao, P.;
Kallal, L. A.; Moore, M. L.; Rivero, R. A.; Palovich, M.; Salmon, M.; Belmonte, K.
E.; Busch-Petersen, J. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 4866.
17. Jin, J.; Budzik, B.; Wang, Y.; Shi, D.; Wang, F.; Xie, H.; Wan, Z.; Zhu, C.; Foley, J. J.;
Webb, E. F.; Berlanga, M.; Burman, M.; Sarau, H. M.; Morrow, D. M.; Moore, M.
L.; Rivero, R. A.; Palovich, M.; Salmon, M.; Belmonte, K. E.; Laine, D. I. J. Med.
Chem. 2008, 51, 5915.
18. Laine, D. I.; McCleland, B.; Thomas, S.; Neipp, C.; Underwood, B.; Dufour, J.;
Widdowson, K. L.; Palovich, M. R.; Blaney, F. E.; Foley, J. J.; Webb, E. F.;
Luttmann, M. A.; Burman, M.; Belmonte, K.; Salmon, M. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 52,
2493.
of 1 (Table 3).14 The selection was made on the basis of the ability
of 24 to form a stable crystalline form with a high melting point
(mp >200 °C), which is considered a desirable property for a dry
powder inhaled drug as it may help prevent polymorphic transfor-
mation or chemical degradation during manufacturing processes
such as micronisation or spray-drying.23 In radioligand binding
studies, 24 was found to be comparably potent to 1 and competed
with [3H]-N-methylscopolamine binding to M3 mAChR (Ki of
0.10 nM). No clear selectivity for M3 over the two other receptor
subtypes was observed for both molecules. Studies to evaluate
the reversibility of 24 at the M3 receptor were also conducted in
the FLIPR assay using a 30 min incubation interval followed by a
180 min washout period. As shown in Figure 2, following the
washout, acetylcholine concentration–response curves did not
fully reverse to levels obtained in the absence of drug at any con-
centration of the compound tested. Similar findings were obtained
at endogenously expressed M3 mAChRs. Thus, in human bronchus
kinetic studies, 24 was found to have a very long off rate (off
t50 >600 min), which was considerably longer than 1 (85 min).
Taken together, these data indicate that antagonist blockade re-
mained after washout, suggesting that 24 is very slowly reversible
at the M3 receptor. To examine the impact of the compound kinet-
ics on in vivo duration of action, 24 was further characterized in a
mouse plethysmography model. Both compounds exhibited
similar potency when dosed intranasally with ED50’s of 0.02 and
19. Laine, D. I.; Palovich, M. R.; Preston, A. G.; Cooper, Anthony W.J.
WO2005067537.
0.01
lg per animal for 24 and 1, respectively. However, when
dosed at the ED80 (0.05
lg/mouse), 24 displayed considerable long-
20. Wan, Z.; Yan, H.; Palovich, M. R.; Laine, D. I. WO2005046586.
21. Arunlakshana, O.; Schild, H. O. Br. J. Pharmacol. 1959, 14, 48–58.
22. Sarau, H. M.; Ames, R. S.; Chamber, J.; Ellis, C.; Elshourbagy, N.; Foley, J. J.;
Schmidt, D. B.; Muccitelli, R. M.; Jenkins, O.; Murdock, P. R.; Herrity, N. C.;
Halsey, W.; Sathe, G.; Muir, A. I.; Nuthulaganti, P.; Dytko, G. M.; Buckley, P. T.;
Wilson, S.; Bergsma, D. J.; Hay, D. W. P. Mol. Pharmacol. 1999, 56, 657.
23. Tong, H. H. Y.; Chow, A. H. L. KONA 2006, 24, 27.
er duration of bronchoprotection (>96 h) than 1 (ꢀ48 h) even
though the latter was given at a dose which exceeded the ED90
(0.5 lg/mouse). This is most likely due to the slower target off-rate
of 24. From a pharmacokinetic viewpoint, both compounds are
characterized in the art as having very high systemic clearance