As shown in Table 2, a great variety of aminoalkynes were
converted to the corresponding 4-carbonyl-quinolines.
Several useful functional groups were tolerated, including
chloride, nitro, acetyl, and ether substituents. The presence
of electron-withdrawing or -donating groups in R2 was
well tolerated. An electron-donating substituent in R2
favored product formation (Table 2, entries 2ꢀ5), whereas
an electron-withdrawing group slightly hindered the reac-
tion (entries 6ꢀ9). When a sterically demanding ortho
substituent was used in R2, a lower yield was obtained
(entry 10). When there were substituents para to the
nitrogen atom regardless if they were electron-donating
or -withdrawing, the oxidative cyclization products were
achieved (entries 11 and 13). However, the presence of the
substituent at the ortho position of the aniline fragment
substituent, the desired oxidative cyclization product was
obtained in acceptable yield. To confirm further the struc-
tural assignment of products in the present oxidative
cyclization, the structure of the product 2b was unambigu-
ously assigned by X-ray crystallography (see the SI).
In view of these results, we turned our attention to
investigate the intramolecular oxidative cyclization. As
described in Table 3, a variety of 4-carbonyl-quinolines
were produced in the presence of catalytic amounts of
CuCl2 (10 mol %), 1,10-phenanthroline (phen; 20 mol %),
and DABCO (2 equiv) at 100 °C under 1 atm of O2 (see
Table S2 in the SI). Table 3 reveals that the electronic
property of alkyne substitutions did not show obvious
influences on the reaction efficiency. However, when
strong electron-withdrawing groups such as acetyl, nitro,
and cyano were embedded in the arylic R3, lower yields
were observed (entries 8, 9, and 11). Notably, several
functional groups such as methoxy, chloro, and bromo
were compatible with this reaction. In addition, hetero-
cycle-derived substrates also appearedtobe excellent in the
reaction, and the product 4l was isolated in 93% yield
(entry 12). Enaminones could also participate in this
reaction, giving moderate to good yields (entries 15 and
16). Surprisingly, unlike in the intermolecular oxidative
cyclization, the substrate with an alkyl group in R3 cannot
participate in the reaction (entry 17).
Table 2. CuCl-Catalyzed Synthesis of 4-Carbonyl-quinolinesa
yield
(%)b
entry
R1
R2
R3
product
Some control experiments were carried out to elucidate
the mechanism (see the SI). The reaction of substrate 3a
withH218O under the optimal reactionconditionsafforded
the 4-carbonyl-quinoline product without any 18O atoms,
as determined by MS. When the reaction was conducted
under a 18O2 atmosphere, the 4-carbonyl-quinoline prod-
uct [18O]-4m containing an 18O atom in ketone was
afforded. These results indicated that the oxygen atom in
ketone was originated from molecular oxygen (O2). When
the reaction was carried out under an Ar atmosphere, only
a trace amount of product was detected. The use of a
stoichiometric amount of copper catalyst did not give any
product under an Ar atmosphere. These results indicated
that the molecular oxygen was essential to the reaction.
Based on the above results, EPR studies,9 and ESI/MS
analysis (see the SI), a plausible mechanism for the copper-
catalyzed aerobic oxidative cyclization4a is illustrated in
Scheme 2. First, Cu(III)10 and a superoxide radical (O2•ꢀ)
are formed through the reaction of CuCl2 and O2 in the
presence of an organic base (DABCO) and Phen, which
could be detected by EPR (see the SI).1c,d,f Then, Cu(III)
can combine with 3a to form Cu(III) complex A. Succes-
sive carbocupration to the alkyne moiety gives vinyl
copperperoxyintermediateB (ESI/MSanalysis, SI). Then,
intermediate B underwent deprotonative OꢀO bond clea-
vage to give 4-carbonyl-quinoline along with the genera-
tion of Cu(II).
1
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Ph
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
Me
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
83
74
73
68
80
60
57
45
42
40
75
40
2
4-Me-C6H4-
4-MeO-C6H4-
4-PhCH2O-C6H4-
3,4-di-Me-C6H3-
4-Cl-C6H4-
3-Cl-C6H4-
4-MeCO-C6H4-
4-NO2-C6H4-
2-MeO-C6H4-
Ph
3
4
5
6
7
2g
2h
2i
8
9
10
11
12
2j
4-Me
4,6-di-
Me
4-Cl
H
2k
2l
Ph
13
14
15
16
Ph
Me
Et
2m
2n
2o
2p
52
65
60
32
Ph
H
4-HO-C6H4-
n-propyl
Me
Me
H
a Reaction conditions: 1 (0.2 mmol), but-2-ynedioate (0.4 mmol),
CuCl (15%), O2 (1 atm), and DMAc (2.0 mL) at 100 °C for 10 h. b Yield
of isolated product.
hampered the reaction (entry 12). Importantly, the aryl
group R2 with an unprotected hydroxyl group was also
compatible, and the desired product was isolated in 60%
yield (entry 15). To our delight, when R2 was an alkyl
(8) (a) Li, L.; Jones, W. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10707. (b)
Korivi, R. P.; Cheng, C.-H. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 7079. (c) Jiang, B.; Si,
Y.-G. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 9449. (d) Yi, C. S.; Yun, S. Y. Org. Lett.
2005, 7, 2181. (e) Beller, M.; Thiel, O. R.; Trauthwein, H.; Hartung,
C. G. Chem.;Eur. J. 2000, 6, 2513. (f) Zhang, Z.; Tan, J.; Wang, Z. Org.
Lett. 2008, 10, 173. (g) Gabriele, B.; Mancuso, R.; Salerno, G.;
Lupinacci, E.; Ruffolo, G.; Costa, M. J. Org. Chem. 2008, 73, 4971.
(h) Gabriele, B.; Mancuso, R.; Salerno, G.; Ruffolo, G.; Plastina, P.
J. Org. Chem. 2007, 72, 6873. (i) Matsubara, Y.; Hirakawa, S.; Yamaguchi,
Y.; Yoshida, Z.-I. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 7670.
(9) Zhang, C.; Xu, Z. J.; Zhang, L. R.; Jiao, N. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2011, 50, 11088.
(10) (a) Rolff, M.; Tuczek, F. Angew. Chem., Int, Ed. 2008, 47, 2344.
(b) Lewis, E. A.; Tolman, W. B. Chem. Rev. 2004, 104, 1047. (c) Gamez,
P.; Aubel, P. G.; Driessen, W. L.; Reedijk, J. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2001, 30,
376. (d) Fontecave, M.; Pierre, J.-L. Coord. Chem. Rev. 1998, 170, 125.
2482
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 10, 2012