D. Duvvuru, P. Retailleau, J.-F. Betzer, A. Marinetti
SHORT COMMUNICATION
[11] N. T. McDougal, S. E. Schaus, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 3189;
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 3117–3119.
[12] a) L. F. Tietze, Chem. Rev. 1996, 96, 115–136; b) H. Pellissier,
Tetrahedron 2006, 62, 1619–1665; c) K. C. Nicolaou, D. J. Ed-
[16] Detailed mechanistic studies have not yet been undertaken.
Therefore, we cannot rule out, so far, the intermediate genera-
tion of an aza-Baylis–Hillman adduct, which would be reduced
then in a subsequent step.
monds, P. G. Bulger, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 7292; Angew. [17] Excess water should be avoided in order to prevent or minimize
Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7134–7186; d) K. C. Nicolaou, J. S.
Chen, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 2993–3009; e) M. Ruiz, P.
López-Alvarado, G. Giorgi, J. C. Menéndez, Chem. Soc. Rev.
2011, 40, 3445–3454.
the hydrolysis of the imine. The water content of MEK was
measured by a Karl–Fischer apparatus.
[18] These reactions were run in methyl ethyl ketone. In AcOEt,
tBuOH and acetone, the reactions gave comparatively lower
yields.
[19] Hydrolysis of phosphonium salts by anionic pathways is in-
volved in a number of formal reduction processes. For relevant
examples and related studies see: a) M. Zanger, C. A.
Van der Werf, W. E. McEwen, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1959, 81,
3806–3807; b) I. J. Borowitz, K. C. Kirby, R. Virkhaus, J. Org.
Chem. 1966, 31, 4031–4037; c) K. Y. Lee, J. E. Na, M. J. Lee,
J. N. Kim, Tetrahedron Lett. 2004, 45, 5977–5981 and refer-
ences cited therein.
[13] For examples of aza-MBH reactions on conjugated dienes, see:
a) T. G. Back, D. A. Rankic, J. M. Sorbetti, J. E. Wulff, Org.
Lett. 2005, 7, 2377–2379; b) J. M. Sorbetti, K. N. Clary, D. A.
Rankic, J. E. Wulff, M. Parvez, T. G. Back, J. Org. Chem. 2007,
72, 3326–3331; c) K. N. Clary, T. G. Back, Synlett 2007, 2995–
2998; d) K. N. Clary, T. G. Back, Synlett 2010, 2802–2804. For
general reviews on MBH and aza-MBH reactions, see: e) D.
Basavaiah, A. J. Rao, T. Satyanarayana, Chem. Rev. 2003, 103,
811–891; f) G. Masson, C. Housseman, J. Zhu, Angew. Chem.
2007, 119, 4698; Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4614–4628;
g) V. Singh, S. Batra, Tetrahedron 2008, 64, 4511–4574; h) G.-
N. Ma, J.-J. Jiang, M. Shi, Y. Wei, Chem. Commun. 2009, 5496–
5514; i) V. Declerck, J. Martinez, F. Lamaty, Chem. Rev. 2009,
109, 1–48; j) I. Deb, P. Shanbhag, S. M. Mobin, I. N. N. Nam-
boothiri, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2009, 4091–4101; k) Y. Wei, M.
Shi, Acc. Chem. Res. 2010, 43, 1005–1018; l) J. Mansilla, J. M.
Saá, Molecules 2010, 15, 709–734.
[14] a) M. Schuler, D. Duvvuru, P. Retailleau, J.-F. Betzer, A. Mari-
netti, Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 4406–4409; b) D. Duvvuru, J.-F.
Betzer, P. Retailleau, G. Frison, A. Marinetti, Adv. Synth. Ca-
tal. 2011, 353, 483–493.
[15] A phosphane-triggered catalytic domino reaction has also been
reported, which combines the same dienes and γ,δ-unsaturated
α-keto esters: J. Ma, P. Xie, C. Hu, Y. Huang, R. Chen, Chem.
Eur. J. 2011, 17, 7418–7422.
[20] a) H. J. Bestmann, G. Schmid, Tetrahedron Lett. 1984, 25,
1441–1444; b) J. Barluenga, F. López, F. Palacios, J. Chem.
Soc., Chem. Commun. 1986, 1574–1575.
[21] Coumarins 1a and 1b are easily available by SeO2 oxidation of
4-methylcoumarin, followed by a Wittig reaction on the re-
sulting aldehyde: 90% yield over two steps, according to known
procedures: a) K. Ito, K. Nakajima, J. Heterocycl. Chem. 1988,
25, 511–515; b) S. Valente, E. Bana, E. Viry, D. Bagrel, G.
Kirsch, Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010, 20, 5827–5830.
[22] The reduced derivative 5, was prepared and fully characterized
by the reaction of 1b and PBu3 in the presence of excess water
(see Supporting Information). The method has also been ap-
plied to the mild and selective reduction of other conjugated
dienes structurally related to 1 (unpublished results).
Received: November 29, 2011
Published Online: January 9, 2012
900
www.eurjoc.org
© 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2012, 897–900