T. Liu et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 3122–3125
3125
Fiebig, H.-H.; Jenny, M.; Jaeger, W.; Heinsch, G.; Hofmann, J. Int. J. Cancer 2001,
94, 89; (c) Zhou, R.; Skibo, E. B. J.Med. Chem. 1996, 39, 4321; (d) Castelli, M.;
Malagoli, M.; Lupo, L.; Riccomi, T. R.; Casolari, C.; Cermelli, C.; Zanca, A.; Baggio,
G. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2001, 88, 67; (e) Chimirri, A.; Monforte, P.; Musumeci, L.;
Rao, A.; Zappalà, M.; Monforteb, A.-M. Arch. Pharm. Pharm. Med. Chem. 2001,
334, 203.
against PC-9 with IC50 of 10.92
cancer inhibitory activity against HCT116 with IC50 of 10.05
l
M, and 5u showed moderate
M.
l
These results showed that compounds containing electron with-
drawing substituents on 3 place at phenly of hydrazone have mod-
erate activity against cancer cell, and those containing hydroxyl on
2 (and 4) place at phenyl of hydrazone have the highest antitumor
activity.
2. Martínez, V.; Burgos, V.; Alvarez-Builla, J.; Fernández, G.; Domingo, A.; Garcia-
Nieto, R.; Gago, F.; Manzanares, I.; Cuevas, C.; Vaquero, J. J. J. Med. Chem. 2004,
47, 1136.
3. Hranjec, M.; Starcevic, K.; Piantanida, I.; Kralj, M.; Marjanovic, M.; Hasani, M.;
Westman, G.; Karminski-Zamola, G. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2008, 43, 2877.
4.. Jayasekera, M. M. K.; Onheiber, K.; Keith, J.; Venkatesan, H.; Stocking, A. E. M.;
Tang, L.; Miller, J.; Gomez, L.; Rhead, B.; Delcamp, T.; Huang, S.; Wolin, R;
Bobkova, E. V.; Shaw, K. J. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 2005, 131.
5. Ates-Alagoz, Z.; Yildiz, S.; Buyukbingol, E. Chemotherapy 2007, 53, 110.
6. Lopez-Rodriguez, M. L.; Benhamu, B.; Morcillo, M. J.; Tejada, I. D.; Orensanz, L.;
Alfaro, M. J.; Martin, M. I. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 5020.
7. (a) Göker, H.; Kus, C.; Boykin, D. W.; Yıldız, S.; Altanlar, N. Bioorg. Med. Chem.
2002, 10, 2589; (b) Demirayak, S.; Abu Mohsen, U.; Karaburun, A. C. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2002, 37, 255; (c) Li, Y. F.; Wang, G. F.; He, P. L.; Huang, W. G.; Zhu, F. H.;
Gao, H. Y.; Tang, W.; Luo, Y.; Feng, C. L.; Li, S. P.; Ren, Y. D.; Lu, W.; Zuo, J. P. J.
Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 4790; (d) Hwua, J. R.; Singha, R.; Honga, S. C.; Changa, Y.
H.; Dasa, A. R.; Vliegen, I.; De Clercq, E.; Neyts, J. Antiviral Res. 2008, 77, 157; (e)
Gualtieri, F.; Brody, G.; Fieldsteel, A. H.; Skinner, W. A. J. Med. Chem. 1972, 15(4),
420.
To examine the mechanism of compounds 5a and 5d responsible
for mediated cell proliferation inhibition, cell cycle distribution was
evaluated using flow cytometric analysis as described previously
using flow cytometry22,23 .The data are shown in Figures 2 and 3.
As can be seen in Figure 2, exposure of A375 cells to growth
suppressive concentration of compounds 5a and 5d resulted in a
significant accumulation of cells in G0/G1 phases, which was
accompanied by a decrease in cells with S and G2/M DNA content.
For example, the percentage of cells in G0/G1 phases was increased
to 85.18% after treatment with 5a at 40 lM for 24 h, whereas the
G0/G1 phase cells in control is 64.17%. Moreover, the percentage
of cells in G0/G1 phases increased by 12.6% over the control after
8. (a) Starcevic, K.; Kralj, M.; Ester, K.; Sabol, I.; Grce, M.; Pavelic, K.; Karminski-
Zamola, G. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2007, 15, 4419; (b) Beaulieu, P. L.; Bos, M.;
Bousquet, Y.; Fazal, G.; Gauthier, J.; Gillard, J.; Goulet, S.; LaPlante, S.; Poupart,
M.-A.; Lefebvre, S.; McKercher, G.; Pellerin, C.; Austelc, V.; Kukolj, G. Bioorg.
Med. Chem. Lett. 2004, 14, 119.
9. Kim, J. S.; Sun, Q.; Yu, C.; Liu, A.; Liu, L. F.; Lavoie, E. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 1998, 6,
163.
10. Nelson, S. M.; Ferquson, L. R.; Denny, W. A. Mutat. Res. 2007, 623, 24.
11. Sun, Q.; Gatto, B.; Yu, C.; Liu, A.; Liu, L. F.; Lavoie, E. J. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38,
3638.
12. Ozlem, T. A.; Betul, T. G.; Ilkay, Y.; Esin, A. S.; Ismail, Y. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2005,
13, 6354.
13. Abdel-Mohsen, H. T.; Ragab, F. A. F.; Ramla, M. M.; El Diwani, H. I. Eur. J. Med.
Chem. 2010, 45, 2336.
14. Galal, S. A.; Hegab, K. H.; Hashem, A. M.; Youssef, N. S. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2010,
45, 5685.
treatment with 5d at 40 lM for 24 h.
In summary, a novel class of acetylhydrazone derivatives with
benzimidazole moieties were synthesizer and tested for their
in vitro antitumor activity against five strains of cancer cell lines.
compounds 5a and 5d showed excellent cancer inhibitory activity
in vitro against the tested cancer cell lines (IC50 4–17 lM). Flow
cytometric analysis revealed that compound 5a and 5d induce sig-
nificant levels of apoptosis in A375 cells in vitro at low micromolar
concentrations. The hydroxyl at 2 (and 4) position on the phenyl
ring of hydrazone play a significant role in the antitumor activity.
This kind of benzimidazole derivatives may constitute a novel class
of antiproliferative agents, which deserve further study.
15. Galal, S. A.; Hegab, K. H.; Kassab, A. S.; Rodriguez, M. L.; Kerwin, S. M.; El-
Khamry, A.-M. A.; El Diwani, H. I. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2009, 44, 1500.
16. Palla, G.; Predieri, G.; Domlano, P. Tetrahedron 1986, 42, 3649.
17. Bloom, A.; Day, A. R. J. Org. Chem. 1939, 142.
18. Ilkay, Y. O.; Ismail, Y.; Esin, A. S.; Nejat, U. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2004, 39, 291.
19. Shingalapur, R. V.; Hosamani, K. M.; Keri, R. S.; Hugar, M. H. Eur. J. Med. Chem.
2010, 45, 1753.
Acknowledgments
We thank the Analytical and Testing Center of Sichuan University
for 1H NMR, IR and MS measurements.
20. Desai, K. G.; Desai, K. R. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 8271.
21. Briefly, Cells (4–5 Â 103/well) were seeded in 96-well plates and cultured for
24 h, followed by various concentration of compounds treatment for 48 h.
Supplementary data
10
l
l of 10 mg/ml MTT was added per well and incubated for another 2.5 h at
Supplementary data (the list of experimental details and spec-
troscopic characterization of 5a–x, and their intermediates) associ-
ated with this article can be found, in the online version, at http://
37 °C, then the supernatant fluid was removed and DMSO was added 150
ll/
well for 15–20 min. The light absorptions (OD) were measured at 570 nm with
SpectraMAX M5 microplate spectrophotometer (Molecular Devices). The effect
of compounds on tumor cells viability was expressed by IC50 of each cell lines.
22. Jiang, P.-D.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Shi, W.; Deng, X.-Q.; Xie, G.; Mao, Y.-Q.; Li, Zh.-G.;
Zheng, Y.-Z. h.; Yang, Sh.-Y.; Wei, Y.-Q. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2008, 22, 431.
23. A375 (1 Â 105cells/well) were seeded in 6-well plates and cultured for 24 h,
followed by treatment with 5a or 5d at various concentrations for 24 h. Then,
cells were harvested and fixed with 70% ethanol for 1 h. The fixed cells were
References and notes
1. (a) Combs, A. P.; Zhu, W. Y.; Crawley, M. L.; Glass, B.; Polam, P.; Sparks, R. B.;
Modi, D.; Takvorian, A.; McLaughlin, E.; Yue, E. W.; Wasserman, Z.; Bower, M.;
Wei, M.; Rupar, M.; Ala, P. J.; Reid, B. M.; Ellis, D.; Gonneville, L.; Emm, T.;
Taylor, N.; Yeleswaram, S.; Li, Y. L.; Wynn, R.; Burn, T. C.; Hollis, G.; Liu, P. C. C.;
Metcalf, B. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 3774; (b) Easmon, J.; Puerstinger, G.; Roth, T.;
washed with PBS and suspended in 1 mL hypotonic solution containing 50 lg/
mL PI in 0.1% sodium citrate plus 0.1% Triton X-100, and then analyzed by Flow
Cytometer (FACS-Callibur, BD, USA). The DNA content of the cells was analyzed
using ModFit software.