the relatively high bond enthalpies of most OꢀH σ-bonds
and the modest reactivity of electron-rich olefins with
nucleophiles, an efficient intramolecular hydrofunctiona-
lization reaction remains a challenge. For intramolecular
alkynyl alcohol hydroalkoxylations, their exist two possi-
ble compounds elucidated by the exo and endo-enol ethers,
as shown in Figure 1, where either exo-dig or endo-dig
cyclization affords six- or seven-membered rings according
to the Baldwin rules.2a Metal catalysis represents a new
frontier in this regard, and there exists plenty of methods to
achieve such conversions. Yamamoto and co-workers
reported the coinage metal-assisted synthesis of hetero-
cycles from various substrates via CꢀO bond formation.3
However, unlike addition of other nucleophiles, analogue
addition of OH functionality across CꢀC triple bonds is
supposed to be difficult due to their poor nucleophilicity of
the hydroxyl group. Unfortunately, the formation of
seven-membered rings by metal catalysts is not common
compared to five- and six-membered rings. In addition,
very expensive catalysts are known to catalyze such pro-
cesses. Considering these aspects, we sought to develop a
new method which overcomes these issues. Herein, we
report a metal as well as a solvent-free protocol for the
hydroalkoxylation of alkynyl alcohols with NaH under
very mild conditions.
Table 1. Optimization Reaction Conditions for Cyclizationa
SN
base
solvent
time
4 h
temp (°C)
yield (%)
1
2
K2CO3
Na2CO3
Cs2CO3
t-BuOK
NaH
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
DMF
130
130
130
130
110
80
32
12 h
6 h
traces
26
3
4
4 h
traces
41
5
4 h
6
DBU
4 h
0
7
DABCO
NaH
4 h
80
0
8
THF
4 h
reflux
reflux
reflux
110
110
110
110
70
traces
34
9
NaH
toluene
CH3CN
DMF
4 h
10
11b
12
13b
14
15
16
NaH
4 h
37
NaH
4 h
55
NaH
1 h
75
NaH
1 h
76
NaH
30 min
40 min
4 h
57
NaH
94
NaNH2
70
41
a Reactions were performed with 1 equiv of base unless otherwise
noted. b Reactions were performed with 2 equiv of base.
the exo mode cyclization with compound A1 from alkynyl
alcohols with metals such as Au,11 Ru,12 Pd,13 Ga,14 Pt,15
and base16,17 such as sodium amide was reported; the
reaction involves more steps to convert into the exocylic
product with high temperature and prolonged reaction
times, and the reaction was not explored well with various
substrates, even though we performed our reaction with
sodium amide. Unfortunately, the reaction was not con-
trolled at that temperature, and it was decomposed.
Endo mode cyclization with alkynyl alcohols was reported
with metals such as Os,18 W,19 Ru,20 Rh,21 Mo,22 and
others.
Figure 1. Three possible cyclized intermediates.
Earlier reports explored the synthesis of exocylic as well
as endocyclic ring formation from various starting materi-
als in the presence of metal or Lewis acids or bases,6
whereas in most cases, the exo mode cyclization has given
the A2 compound from alkynyl alcohols with lanthanide
catalysts,5 W,6 Au,7 Ag,8 Cu,9 and base.10 In a similar way,
We designed our route starting from amino acids to
synthesize the oxazine and oxazepine derivatives. To the
best of our knowledge, such a route has not been docu-
mented, and to date, NaH has not been exploited as a
(5) (a) Yu, X.; Seo, S. Y.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129,
7244–7245. (b) Dzudza, A.; Marks, T. J. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 3403–
3422. (c) Seo, S.; Yu, X.; Marks, T. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 263–
276.
(6) Barluenga, J.; Dieguez, A.; Rodriguez, F.; Fananas, F. J.; Sordo,
T.; Campomanes, P. Chem.;Eur. J. 2005, 11, 5735–5741.
(7) Ruettinger, R.; Leutzow, J.; Wilsdorf, M.; Wilckens, K.; Czekelius,
C. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 224–227.
(15) (a) Barluenga, J.; Fernandez, A.; Satrustegui, A.; Dieguez, A.;
Rodriguez, F.; Fananas, F. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14, 4153–4156.
(b) Wang, J. Z.; Lin, X.; Luck, R. L.; Gibbons, G.; Fang, S. Tetrahedron
2009, 65, 2643–2648.
(8) Pale, P.; Chuche, J. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2000, 6, 1019–1026.
(9) Praveen, C.; Iyyappan, C.; Perumal, P. T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2010,
51, 4767–4771.
(16) Lysek, R.; Furman, B.; Kaluza, Z.; Frelek, J.; Suwinska, K.;
Urbanczyk-Lipkowska, Z.; Chmielewski, M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry
2000, 11, 3131–3150.
(17) Pettigrew, J. D.; Wilson, P. D. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 1427–1429.
(18) Fernandez, A. V.; Yebra, C. G.; Varela, J. A.; Esteruelas, M. A.;
Saa, C. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4278–4281.
(19) (a) Alcazar, E.; Pletcher, J. M.; McDonald, F. E. Org. Lett. 2004,
6, 3877–3880. (b) McDonald, F.; Reddy, K. S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2001, 40, 3653–3655.
(10) Davies, S. G.; Roberts, P. M.; Stephenson, P. T.; Thomson, J. E.
Tetrahedron Lett. 2009, 50, 3509–3512.
(11) Hashmi, A. S. K.; Haufe, P.; Schmid, C.; Nass, A. R.; Frey, W.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2006, 12, 5376–5382.
(12) Cadierno, V.; Diez, J.; Gimeno, J.; Nebra, N. J. Org. Chem.
2008, 73, 5852–5858.
(20) Liu, F. N.; Su, F. H.; Wen, T. B.; Sung, H.-Y.; Williams, I. D.;
Jia, G. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 7889–7897.
(21) Trost, B. M.; Rhee, Y. H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 7482–
7483.
(13) (a) Riediker, M.; Schwartz, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104,
5842–5844. (b) Ramana, C. V.; Induvadana, B.; Srinivas, B.; Yadagiri,
K.; Deshmukh, M. N.; Gonnade, R. G. Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 9819–
9832.
(14) Li, H. J.; Guillot, R.; Gandon, V. J. Org. Chem. 2010, 75, 8435–
8449.
(22) McDonald, F. E.; Gleason, M. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118,
6648–6659.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 12, 2012
3135