ENANTIODIFFERENTIATING PHOTOCYCLIZATION
401
The ee of product 2 was determined by chiral high-performance
liquid chromatography on a JASCOplus instrument equipped with a
UV detector (detection wavelength: 220 nm).16 The chiral high-
performance liquid chromatography analysis was run at 5 ꢀC on a Daicel
(Osaka, Japan) Chiralpak IB column (5 mm particles, 4.6 mm
f  250 mm) eluted with a 98:1:1 mixture of n-hexane/isopropanol/1,2-
dichloroethane at a flow rate of 0.3 ml/min under the isocratic condition.
The enantiomer peaks were well separated at retention times 22 and 25
min, from the integrated areas of which the product’s ee was calculated
with an error of Æ2% ee.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Fluorescence Quenching
In our previous study,16 we found that the fluorescence of
sensitizer 3 was efficiently quenched upon addition of
substrate 1 to give cyclization product 2 in good yield but failed
to unambiguously prove the intervention of an exciplex
intermediate in the photocyclization process by detecting the
exciplex fluorescence. The lack of fluorescence is presumably
due to the fast intramolecular nucleophilic attack of the
terminal hydroxyl to the radical-cationic olefin moiety of 1,
leading to cyclization product 2 (Scheme 1). If this is indeed
the case, the exciplex lifetime is expected to be appreciably
elongated by blocking the cyclization path to 2 through
methylation of the terminal OH of 1. In the present study,
we therefore employed 5-methoxy-1,1-diphenylpentene (4)18
(Scheme 2) as an unreactive “dummy” substrate that possesses
the same donor moiety as 1 but never yields the cyclization
product and compared its fluorescence quenching behavior
with that of intact substrate 1.
Scheme 1. Enantiodifferentiating photocyclization of 5-hydroxy-1,
1-diphenylpentene (1) to chiral cyclization, product (2) sensitized by bis(1,2;4,
5-di-O-isopropylidene-a-fructopyranosyl) 1,4-naphthalenedicarboxylate (3).
JASCO (Hachioji, Japan) FP-6500 spectrofluorimeter or on an Edinburgh
FL920S instrument. Fluorescence lifetimes were determined by the time-
correlated single-photon-counting technique, using an Edinburgh FL920S
instrument equipped with a pulsed H2 light source or a Hamamatsu C4334
instrument equipped with an N2 laser (Usho KEC-160, Osaka, Japan).
All chemicals were purchased from Wako (Osaka, Japan) and used without
further purifications. Spectrograde solvents were used throughout the work.
5-Hydroxy-1,1-diphenylpentene (1) was prepared as reported previ-
ously.16 5-Methoxy-1,1-diphenylpentene (4) employed as a “dummy”
substrate was prepared from 1 by the Williamson ether synthesis by
using iodomethane and sodium hydride (Scheme 2);18 1H NMR (CDCl3):
d 1.72 (tt, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.18 (dt, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 3.29 (s, 3H), 3.36
(t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 6.09 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.17–7.38 (m, 10H); mass
spectrometry (electron impact ionization) m/z (relative intensity) 252
(M+, 4), 236 (30), 207 (41), 166 (100),77 (28); high-resolution mass spec-
trometry Calcd for C18H20O (M+): 252.1514. Found: 252.1514.
We first examined the fluorescence quenching behavior
of sensitizer 3 with substrate 1 in diethyl ether at room
temperature. As shown in Figure 1(a), gradual addition of 1
of up to 10 mM to an ether solution of 3 (10 mM) led to an
efficient fluorescence quenching. According to the Stern–
Volmer (S–V) equation, I0F/IF = 1 + kQt0[Q], where kQ denotes
the apparent quenching rate constant and t0 the natural lifetime
of 3; the relative fluorescence intensity (I0F/IF) was plotted
against the quencher concentration [Q] (Q = 1) to give a
straight line (Fig. 1(b)). The S–V constant, defined as the slope
of the S–V plot, is a product of the apparent quenching rate
constant (kQ) and the inherent lifetime (t0) of fluorophore 3.
The t0 value was independently determined as 8.7 ns by using
the single-photon counting technique in the absence of a
quencher under a comparable condition. From the S–V
constant (kQt0) and the lifetime (t0), we obtain the quenching
rate constant: kQ = 7.9 Â 109 MÀ1 sÀ1 (Table 1).
Photolysis and Product Analysis
Solutions of substrate 1 (2 or 20 mM) and sensitizer 3 (0.3 or 3 mM) in
quartz cells were purged with nitrogen gas at 0 ꢀC, placed in a Unisoku
(Hirakata, Japan) CoolspeK cryostat maintained at a given temperature
and then irradiated at wavelengths >320 nm (effective wavelength: 313
nm) with a 500-W high-pressure mercury lamp through a 5-cm water
layer and a Toshiba (Tokyo, Japan) UV-31 or UV-D36B filter.
Irradiated samples were subjected to gas chromatographic (GC) analysis
on a Zebron (Torrance, CA, USA) ZB-WAXplus (0.25 mm f  30 m) or GL
Science TC-1 column (0.25 mm f  30 m) to determine the conversion (con-
sumption of 1) and chemical yield of 2 on the basis of consumed 1.15 The GC
analyses were performed at a head pressure of 100 kPa with a temperature
program, where the column temperature was kept at 180 ꢀC for first 8 min,
raised to 220 ꢀC at a rate of 20 ꢀC/min, and then hold at that temperature
for 40 min. Under the condition employed, the retention times of substrate
1 and product 2 were 36 min and 13 min, respectively, on the ZB-WAXplus
column and 15 min and 13 min, respectively, on the TC-1 column.
Similar fluorescence quenching experiments were performed
with “dummy” substrate 4 in MCH, toluene, diethyl ether, and
acetonitrile and also in MCH-containing acetonitrile (0.6 M) or
propionitrile (0.1-0.6 M) as a cosolvent to give the quenching
parameters summarized in Table 1.
Scheme 2. Synthesis of 5-methoxy-1,1-diphenypentene (4).
Chirality DOI 10.1002/chir