3286
T. Poisson et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 53 (2012) 3284–3287
Table 4
Steglich rearrangementa
Scheme 2. Preparation of catalyst 9.17b
Table 3
Buchwald–Hartwig cross-coupling with 1a
Entry
Catalyst
Time (h)
Solvent
Yieldb (%)
eec (%)
1
2
3
4
5
2i
9
10d
10d
10d
24
8
6
6
6
t-Amyl-OH
t-Amyl-OH
t-Amyl-OH
THF
60
80
99
86
40
10
<5
20
16
20
DCM
a
Conditions: Azalactone enol carbonate (0.1 mmol), catalyst (5 mol %), solvent
(2 mL).
Entry
Amine
Aniline
Product
Yieldb (%)
b
Isolated yield.
1
2
3
4
5
10a
10b
10c
10d
10e
45
51
c
Determined by HPLC using chiral column.
a-Naphtylamine
(R)-
(R)-
a
a
-Methylbenzylamine
-Methylnaphtylamine
84c
78c
50
Pyrrolidine
As summarized in Table 4 and despite all our efforts, no or poor
enantioselectivities (not exceeding 20% ee) were obtained. Note-
worthy, in all cases a decent turnover of the catalyst was observed,
pointing out the good nucleophilic properties of our DMAP catalysts.
a
Conditions:
1 (1 equiv), amine (1.25 equiv) Pd2(dba)3 (2 mol %), BINAP
(4 mol %), t-BuONa (1.5 equiv), toluene, 110 °C, 16 h.
b
Isolated yield.
Reaction proceeds without racemization.
c
Herein, we described
a new and efficient access to C-3
functionalized DMAPs from the readily available 3-bromo dimeth-
ylaminopyridine 1 thanks to a straightforward room temperature
bromine–magnesium exchange reaction. Several DMAPs bearing
various functional groups at C-3 position as well as relevant chiral
appendages were obtained in good yields. From the same key
intermediate 1, an efficient Pd-catalyzed C–N cross-coupling reac-
tion was also developed leading to new chiral 3-amino DMAP
derivatives. Both halogen-metal exchange and cross-coupling ap-
proaches led to a short- step synthesis of three new chiral catalysts
without any resolution step. These three catalysts were evaluated
in the Steglich rearrangement and despite decent catalytic activi-
ties, the enantiomeric excesses remained modest. However, the
straightforward access to these catalysts prompts us to go further
into and new original applications of these catalysts are currently
underway in our laboratory.
As depicted in Table 2, we first studied the reaction parameters
with phenylmagnesium bromide as the Grignard reagent. After
extensive investigations, we were pleased to find out that the reac-
tion carried out in DCM, with freshly prepared Grignard reagent in
Et2O afforded the corresponding sulfinamine in good yield with
fairly good diastereoselectivity (up to 92:8, entry 6). We should no-
tice that these results are in agreement with the report by Ellman
and co-workers.16
With these optimized conditions in hand, the anthracenyl pat-
tern was successfully introduced in 91% yield with excellent dia-
stereoselectivity (>95:5, entry 8). Then, a one pot deprotection–
acylation reaction sequence gave the corresponding enantiomeri-
cally pure DMAP analog 9 in 63% yield without any erosion of
the optical purity (Scheme 2).17
Then, we turned our attention to the use of the bromo deriva-
tive 1 in metal catalyzed cross-coupling reactions. To the best of
our knowledge, reactions involving 1 as the reaction partner in
cross-coupling reaction are limited to sporadic examples.6 More-
over, the introduction of an amino group through a Buchwald–Har-
twig cross-coupling reaction on the DMAP backbone remains, to
date, unexplored. Thus, this strategy would lead to a new class of
DMAP analogs bearing an amino group at C-3 position.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by CNRS, INSA-Rouen, the University
of Rouen and Region Haute Normandie. T.P. thanks the MENRT for
a
predoctoral fellowship. Dr. Vincent Gembus is gratefully
acknowledged for helpful comments during the preparation of
the manuscript.
As shown in Table 3, the introduction of an amino group was
successfully achieved using Pd2dba3/BINAP/t-BuONa as a catalytic
system, affording various 3-amino DMAP derivatives 10a–e in
moderate to excellent yields. However, the scope of amine deriva-
tives underlined some limitations. In particular, this process was
found to be highly dependent on the steric hindrance of the amine.
The reaction is restricted to primary and strained secondary
amines (ie., pyrrolidine, entry 5).18 As shown in entries 3 and 4,
References and notes
1. (a) Hofle, G.; Steglich, W.; Vorbruggen, H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1978, 17, 569–583;
(b) Spivey, A. C.; Arseniyadis, S. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5436–5441.
2. (a) Muragan, R.; Scriven, E. F. V. Aldrich Chem. Act. 2003, 36, 21–27; For an
exhaustive review about chiral DMAP see: (b) Wurtz, R. P. Chem. Rev. 2007, 107,
5570–5595; For selected examples of recent reports dealing with nucleophilic
catalysts involved in secondary alcohol resolution or Steglich rearrangement
see: (c) Hu, B.; Meng, M.; Wang, Z.; Du, W.; Fossey, J. S.; Hu, X.; Deng, W.-P. J.
Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 17041–17044; (d) Vladimir B. Birman, V. B.; Uffman,
E. W.; Jiang, H.; Li, X.; Kilbane, C. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 12226–12227;
(e) Li, X.; Liu, P.; Houk, K. N.; Birman, V. B. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 13836–
13837; (f) Hu, B.; Meng, M.; Fossey, J. S.; Mo, W.; Hu, X.; Deng, W.-P. Chem.
Commun. 2011, 47, 10632–10634; (g) Crittall, M. R.; Rzepa, H. S.; Carbery, D. R.
Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1250–1253.
the introduction of amines bearing an
a-stereogenic center was
successfully achieved, yielding to new chiral DMAP analogs 10c
and 10d in good yield without racemization.
Having developed several synthetic pathways providing
straightforward access to chiral DMAP derivatives, we decided to
evaluatechiral catalysts 2j, 9, and 10d in the Steglichrearrangement.
3. Vedejs, E.; Chen, X. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 1809–1810.
4. Hassner, A.; Krepski, L. R.; Alexanian, V. Tetrahedron 1978, 34, 2069–2076.