equatorial plane defined by N2 and the alkyl groups (C47 and
C51). The phosphinimine donors (N1 and N3) occupy the apical
sites. The bond angles about the equatorial plane in each
complex are close to the ideal value of 120° (N2–Er1–C47 =
115.8(1)°, N2–Er1–C51 = 117.0(1)°, C47–Er1–C51 = 127.3(2)°,
7a; N2–Lu1–C47 = 117.2(1)°, N2–Lu1–C51 = 116.0(1)°, C47–
Lu1–C51 = 126.8(1)°, 7b); however, the apical bond angle (N1–
Ln–N3) deviates significantly from 180° (142.4(1)°, 7a; 144.3
(1)°, 7b). The Ln–C–Si bond angles fall within the normal range
for rare earth trimethylsilylmethyl complexes (129.5(3)°, 136.6
(2)°, 7a; 130.7(2)°, 136.9(2)°, 7b). The Er–C bond lengths in
7a (2.375(6) Å and 2.397(5) Å) agree well with other recently
structurally characterised organoerbium complexes, such as
(nacnac)Er(CH2SiMe3)2 (2.342(3) Å and 2.380(2) Å)14 and
(Czx)Er(CH2SiMe3)2 (2.398(3) and 2.404(3) Å),15 where nacnac
= 2,6-iPr-C6H3 substituted β-diketiminate and Czx = carbazole-
bis(oxazoline). Complex 7b exhibits slightly shorter Lu–C bond
lengths (2.347(4) Å and 2.355(4) Å) than the corresponding con-
tacts in the erbium congener, but the distances fall within the
range expected for typical Lu–CH2SiMe3 bonds.16
In 7a and 7b, the metal sits in the centre of the ancillary
ligand binding pocket. Both of the complexes exhibit Ln–pyrrole
distances that are significantly shorter than the Ln–phosphini-
mine lengths (Er1–N2 = 2.338(3) Å cf. Er1–N1 = 2.360(3) Å
and Er1–N3 = 2.396(3) Å, 7a; Lu1–N2 = 2.297(2) Å cf. Lu1–
N3 = 2.332(3) Å and Lu1–N1 = 2.364(2) Å, 7b). The P–N
bonds in the dialkyl complexes (ranging from 1.606(4) to 1.610
(3) Å) are elongated by ca. 3% compared to those in the free
protio-ligand, suggesting strong donation from the phosphini-
mine functionality to the rare earth metal.
Preliminary reactivity studies of 7b (on an NMR tube scale in
benzene-d6) have revealed rich reaction chemistry. For instance,
addition of one equivalent of the oxonium acid, [H(OEt2)2]+
[B(C6F5)4]−, 17 to 7b proceeded at ambient temperature over
4.5 h to liberate the expected cationic species as a diethyl ether
adduct, [LLu(CH2SiMe3)(OEt2)2]+[B(C6F5)4]−, 8, with loss of
one equivalent of SiMe4. Alternatively, reaction of 7b with one
equivalent of Mes*NH2 (Mes* = 2,4,6-tBu3-C6H2) in the pres-
ence of 4-dimethylaminopyridine (DMAP) at 100 °C (over
1.5 h) resulted in the clean formation of the DMAP adduct of the
mixed alkyl–anilide complex, LLu(CH2SiMe3)(NHMes*)
(DMAP), 9. The neutral (7a–c) and cationic (8) complexes are
of interest to us as catalysts for various applications (e.g. lactone
and olefin polymerisation) and we are currently evaluating their
efficacy for mediating such processes. We are also interested in
exploring the chemistry of 9 as it may provide fundamental
insight into the structure and reactivity of lanthanide alkyl–
anilide complexes, as well as serving as a useful hydroamination
catalyst precursor.
this ligand in that it can readily be complexed to lanthanide
metals via an alkane elimination protocol to generate thermally
robust rare earth dialkyl species. Current efforts are underway to
investigate the small molecule reactivity of complexes 7a–c in
order to exploit the full range of their utility.
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by the Natural Sciences
and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) of Canada and the
Canada Foundation for Innovation. The authors thank Dr. Craig
Wheaton and Mr. Amin Moazeni for performing elemental ana-
lyses of the new compounds.
Notes and references
1 (a) F. T. Edelmann, D. M. M. Freckmann and H. Schumann, Chem. Rev.,
2002, 102, 1851; (b) P. Mountford and B. D. Ward, Chem. Commun.,
2003, 1797; (c) W. E. Piers and D. J. H. Emslie, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2002, 233–234, 131.
2 (a) J. Gromada, J.-F. Carpentier and A. Mortreux, Coord. Chem. Rev.,
2004, 248, 397; (b) Y. Nakayama and H. Yasuda, J. Organomet. Chem.,
2004, 689, 4489.
3 W. Gao, D. Cui, X. Liu, Y. Zhang and Y. Mu, Organometallics, 2008, 27,
5889.
4 (a) S. Hong and T. J. Marks, Acc. Chem. Res., 2004, 37, 673; (b) T.
E. Müller, K. C. Hultzsch, M. Yus, F. Foubelo and M. Tada, Chem. Rev.,
2008, 108, 3795.
5 K. R. D. Johnson and P. G. Hayes, Organometallics, 2009, 28, 6352.
6 K. R. D. Johnson and P. G. Hayes, Organometallics, 2011, 30, 58.
7 G. J. P. Britovsek, V. C. Gibson, O. D. Hoarau, S. K. Spitzmesser,
A. J. P. White and D. J. Williams, Inorg. Chem., 2003, 42, 3454.
8 L. Groenendaal, H. W. I. Peerlings, J. L. J. van Dongen, E. E. Havinga,
J. A. J. M. Vekemans and E. W. Meijer, Macromolecules, 1995, 28, 116.
9 W. Chen and M. P. Cava, Tetrahedron Lett., 1987, 28, 6025.
ˉ
10 Structure 6: C46H45N3P2, P1, a = 12.9263(2) Å, b = 14.5326(2) Å, c =
14.8331(3) Å, α = 112.587(1)°, β = 103.521(1)°, γ = 108.770(1)°, N =
36845, Nind 10 171, R1 = 0.0709 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2 = 0.1723 (I >
2σ(I)), GOF = 1.045.
11 In the solid-state, 6 assembles into centrosymmetric hydrogen-bonded
pairs, with the pyrrole N–H on each molecule associating with an imine
nitrogen (N3) on the other (d(N⋯N) = 2.851(3) Å).
12 K. D. Conroy, W. E. Piers and M. Parvez, J. Organomet. Chem., 2008,
693, 834.
ˉ
13 Structure 7a: C54H66ErN3P2Si2, P1, a = 9.729(5) Å, b = 12.188(6) Å, c =
24.287(11) Å, α = 84.796(5)°, β = 78.920(5)°, γ = 69.550(5)°, N =
34897, Nind 10 778, R1 = 0.0365 (I > 2σ(I)) and wR2 = 0.0818 (I >
ˉ
2σ(I)), GOF = 1.022. Structure 7b: C54H66LuN3P2Si2, P1, a = 9.7163(6)
Å, b = 12.1266(7) Å, c = 24.2569(14) Å, α = 84.9530(10)°, β = 78.9220
(10)°, γ = 69.4640(10)°, N = 37480, Nind 11 526, R1 = 0.0300 (I > 2σ(I))
and wR2 = 0.0721 (I > 2σ(I)), GOF = 1.023.
14 K. R. D. Johnson, A. P. Côté and P. G. Hayes, J. Organomet. Chem.,
2010, 695, 2747.
15 J. Zou, D. J. Berg, D. Stuart, R. McDonald and B. Twamley, Organome-
tallics, 2011, 30, 4958.
16 An analysis of 47 entries in the Cambridge Structural Database (CSD
version 5.32, updated Aug. 2011) for neutral bis(trimethylsilylmethyl)
lutetium complexes of the generic form (L)nLu(CH2SiMe3)2 suggested an
average Lu–CH2SiMe3 bond length of 2.35 Å (range = 2.293–2.406 Å).
17 P. Jutzi, C. Müller, A. Stammler and H.-G. Stammler, Organometallics,
2000, 19, 1442.
In conclusion, we have prepared and characterised a new
ancillary ligand comprised of a modular bis(phosphinimine)
pyrrole framework (6). We have demonstrated the versatility of
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Dalton Trans., 2012, 41, 7873–7875 | 7875