Time-of-Flight (ToF) measurements determined that the
hole mobility (mh) in an unaligned sample of 1b[8] was 3.3 ꢂ
0.2 ꢁ 10ꢀ3 cm2 Vꢀ1 sꢀ1 in the temperature range of 40–110 1C
and showed weak temperature dependence. However, the
charge photogeneration was inefficient and the resulting
photocurrent was only 6.0 ꢁ 10ꢀ13 S cmꢀ1 at 90 1C, comparable
with dark current (4.0 ꢁ 10ꢀ13 S cmꢀ1 at 90 1C). No photo-
conductivity was detected in the isotropic phase of 1b[8].
Electrochemical analysis of 1b[8] in CH2Cl2 (10ꢀ3 M)
revealed two quasi-reversible redox pairs. The measured potentials,
E0/+11/2 = +0.83 V and E0/ꢀ11/2 = ꢀ0.60 V vs. SCE, are shifted
cathodically by about 0.16 V relative to those reported for 1a[6].1
The observed cell potential Ecell = 1.43 V is consistent with a
relatively low disproportionation energy calculated for 1b[1]
(rigid, 107.5 kcal molꢀ1; relaxed, 92.3 kcal molꢀ1).
Fig. 4 2D XRD pattern for 1b[8] at 115 1C.
Table 2 Selected X-ray diffraction data for Colh phase of 1b[n]
In conclusion, achiral liquid crystalline 6-oxoverdazyl radicals
1b[n] exhibit unprecedented reversible thermochromism at the
transition from the hexagonal columnar (Colh) to the isotropic
phase. XRD and magnetization results do not support dimeriza-
tion of the radicals in the Colh phase, although the discs exhibit
significant correlation length along the column. In contrast to
the sulfur analog 1a[8], charge photogeneration in 1b[8] was
inefficient; however, charge mobility in both compounds is
comparable. Further studies to understand the origin of the
observed thermochromism and low efficiency of charge photo-
generation are currently in progress.
n
Temp/1C Miller indices hk d spacing/A Lattice parameter/A
8
115
10
10
10
22.81
4.35
24.56
4.26
25.07
4.33
a = 26.35
a = 28.35
a = 28.95
10 30
110
Analysis of the low temperature phase observed by DSC for
1b[10] revealed another signal in the small angle region
indicating the formation of a superlattice with doubling the
basic lattice periodicity, occasionally observed in some Colh
phases.10 This is consistent with a low hysteresis of the
transition, suggesting minimal molecular reorganization.
The cell constant a = 26.35 A for 1b[8] (Table 2) is smaller
than the calculated molecular size of 1b[8] (32 A). For 1b[10],
the cell constant a increases with temperature at a rate of
This work was supported by Vanderbilt University Discovery
Grant and NSF grant (DMR-0907542). We thank Prof. Andrzej
Twardowski for funding SQUID measurements and Ms Ola
Kruczkowska for her technical assistance.
Notes and references
1 A. Jankowiak, D. Pociecha, J. Szczytko, H. Monobe and
5.49 ꢁ 10ꢀ3 A Kꢀ1
.
P. Kaszyn
2 A. Jankowiak and P. Kaszyn
3 A. Nowak-Krol, D. Gryko and D. T. Gryko, Chem.–Asian J.,
2010, 5, 904.
´
ski, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 2465.
´
ski, Beilstein J. Org. Chem., 2012, 8, 275.
Magnetic studies at 500 Oe revealed paramagnetic behavior
of 1b[8] in the liquid crystalline phase and do not support
formation of dimers in the columnar phase. The effective
magnetic moment (meff) in the mesophase was found to be
1.591(4) in a temperature range of 200–360 K, which is close to
the value of 1.732 for an ideal paramagnet and corresponds to
92 ꢂ 1% of spins. The number of spins increases to 96% near
the isotropic transition. Cooling of the sample from the nearly
isotropic phase to 2 K at 500 Oe showed that molar susceptibility
wm is well described by the Curie law down to 200 K where
antiferromagnetic interactions gradually increase. The results are
similar to those found for 1a[8] and indicate that spins remain
largely isolated at >200 K.
´
4 H. Kretzschmann, K. Muller, H. Kolshorn, D. Schollmeyer and
¨
H. Meier, Chem. Ber., 1994, 127, 1735.
5 R. Milcent, G. Barbier, S. Capelle and J.-P. Catteau, J. Heterocycl.
Chem., 1994, 31, 319.
6 B3LYP/6-31G(d,p) level of theory. See ESIw for details.
7 H. Lee, D. Kim, H.-K. Lee, W. Qiu, N.-K. Oh, W.-C. Zin and
K. Kim, Tetrahedron Lett., 2004, 45, 1019.
8 R. G. Hicks, in Stable Radicals Fundamentals and Applied Aspects
of Odd-Electron Compounds, ed. R. G. Hicks, Wiley&Sons, 2010,
pp. 245–280, and references therein.
9 B. D. Koivisto, A. S. Ichimura, R. McDonald, M. T. Lemaire,
L. K. Thompson and R. G. Hicks, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2006, 128, 690.
10 T. N. Y. Hoang, D. Pociecha, M. Salamonczyk, E. Gorecka and
R. Deschenaux, Soft Matter, 2011, 7, 4948.
c
7066 Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 7064–7066
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012