V. Nahum et al.
International Journal of Pharmaceutics 603 (2021) 120689
with the OECD guidelines (OECD/OCDE, 1995). The two phases were
mixed for 24 h to form saturated phases. Solutions of AHA (8) and DAM
(12) (1 mM) were prepared in the aqueous phase and solutions of salts
were prepared in the aqueous phase adjusted to pH 11. The aqueous
phases were mixed with n-octanol in 10 mL tube at the following
portions:
that covered a linear range of 0.5–120 µg/ml, r2 > 0.998. Permeation
was evaluated by plotting the cumulative amount of permeate passing
per cm2 of skin versus time. In cases in which steady state permeation
was reached, the absorption rates (Jss) were determined as the slopes of
the linear portion of the plot. The lag times (TL) were calculated from
linear extrapolation of the steady state portion of the plot. The perme-
ability coefficients (Kp) were calculated as the ratio between the ab-
sorption rates and the initial concentrations of the permeates in the
applied formulations. Total accumulations (Q8) were calculated as the
cumulative amount of permeate after 8 h. Each experiment was evalu-
ated by four independent replicates. The integrity of the skins was
assessed by examining the permeation results. Skins that were damaged
and exhibited excessive penetration rate (>10,000 µg cm-2hꢀ 1 without
reaching steady state) were removed from the analysis and replaced by
additional experiments. All skin permeation results are presented as the
mean ± standard error of the mean (SEM). Statistical analysis was
performed using a one-way ANOVA followed by either a Dunnett’s or
Bonferroni multiple comparison test to determine differences in pene-
tration rates. Results were considered significant for P < 0.05.
(1) Water/n-octanol 1:1 (5 mL each)
(2) Water/n-octanol 1:2 (aqueous phase 3 mL n-octanol phase 6 mL)
(3) Water/n-octanol 2:1 (aqueous phase 6 mL n-octanol phase 3 mL)
Duplicates of each solution in tubes were closed with a cap and
shaken for 24 h at room temperature. After careful separation using
centrifugation and by a syringe, the concentration at each phase was
evaluated by means of HPLC. The partition coefficient was calculated as
the ratio between the concentrations of the two phases. Three solutions
with different ratios of water/n-octanol were used to ensure that the
results are not erroneous due to saturation of one of the phases with the
tested compounds.
2.7. In vitro skin penetration
3. Results and discussion
Portions of (5 × 5 cm) of excised domestic pig back skin free of fat
(obtained from Lahav CRO, Israel) were carefully cleaned and stored at
ꢀ 80 ◦C. Prior to use the skin portions were thawed at 4 ◦C overnight.
Flow-through diffusion cells were used throughout the study. PBS was
chosen as the receptor fluid since it is commonly used in similar studies
and as it follows the OECD guidelines which state that a test material
should be soluble up to ten times the likely maximum concentration
achievable in the receptor fluid during the experiment (Pendlington,
2008). The solubility of the various salts of 8 and 12 was found to be
orders of magnitude higher than that required by the above guidelines.
During the experiments, the solution in the receptor chamber was
maintained at 32 ◦C (using a HAAKE P5 circulating water bath) and
stirred with Teflon-coated magnetic stirring bars. The skin was mounted
between the donor and receptor compartments with a pinch clamp with
the stratum corneum facing the donor compartment and the dermis
facing the receptor compartment (exposed area 3.46 cm2). All receptor
cells were filed with PBS (pH 7.4) and connected to peristaltic pumps
(Ismatec 2/12). The receptor solution was continuously pumped at a
flow rate of 166 µL/min. Donor compartments were covered with plastic
lids and the system was equilibrated for 20 min. After equilibration 2 mL
of the formulation was added to the donor compartments and the so-
lution was covered with a plastic lid. Receptor solution was continuously
collected into 5 mL tubes by an automatic fraction collector (ISCO
RETRIEVER IV) for 30 min intervals, up to 8 h, and immediately sealed.
The formulation in the donor compartment was left on the skin for 30
min and then removed by washing four times with PBS solution.
3.1. Initial screening of potential nucleophiles
The preliminary step of this work was to identify and evaluate po-
tential compounds, from pharmaceutical origin, for subcutaneous
neutralization of OP CWAs. Thus, we sought after Active Pharmaceutical
Ingredients (APIs) and excipients in the pharmaceutical and cosmetics
industries, that may fulfill the following criteria. 1) Such APIs must be
nucleophilic in order to react with the electrophilic OP’s. They must also
bear a functional group which is deprotonated at pH < 12 in order to
avoid skin damage. Such compounds may be hydroxyls (with emphasis
on phenols which have a lower pKa than aliphatic alcohols), carboxyl-
ates, amines, oximes and hydroxamates as their conjugated base would
serve as a strong nucleophile. 2) The APIs should be of the lowest mo-
lecular weight possible, as chemicals with a molecular weight greater
than ~500 Da do not penetrate the skin efficiently (the ‘rule of 500’) (Bos
and Meinardi, 2000). 3) The APIs should be the least toxic possible. 4)
Simple structured and non-expensive compounds are preferred. Based on
these criteria, we scanned several pharmaceutical databases: Drug Bank
web site (Wishart et al., 2018), Orange Book– FDA web site (“U.S. Food
and Drug Administration Orange Book.,”) and Handbook of Pharma-
ceutical Excipients (Rowe et al., 2013). Consequently, we located a
handful of APIs that meet the threshold requirements 1–3 and may be
used as potential nucleophiles for this purpose. Among those are phenols
(1, 2, 4, 7), amines (3, 5, 6) and hydroxamic acids (8–11) (Table 1).
Beyond the nucleophiles, additional key aspects also need to be
considered in the formulation design: (i) VX (15) has low solubility in
aqueous solutions (Yang et al., 1992). Therefore, the formulation has to
be based (at least partially) on an organic solvent that could solubilize
VX (15) in order to facilitate its hydrolysis. (ii) It is desirable that the
solvent would accelerate nucleophilic substitution reactions. This
should be achieved either by stabilizing the transition state or destabi-
lizing the ground state, as was previously established mechanistically
(Ashkenazi et al., 2010; Hamlin et al., 2018). (iii) It is advisable that the
solvent would serve as a permeation enhancer in order to increase the
permeation of the nucleophile through the stratum corneum (Williams
and Barry, 2004). (iv) The formulation should preferably solubilize high
quantities of the nucleophile, to assure sufficient hydrolytic and
permeation rates.
2.8. Sample analysis
The receptor samples from permeation experiments, collected over
0.5 h intervals, were analyzed using high-performance liquid chroma-
tography (Dionex Ultimate 3000). Aliquots of 10 µL or 40 µL from the
samples were injected into the column (Phenomenex, Gemini 5 µm C18
110 Å). The mobile phase consisting of a mixture containing acetonitrile
and water (1:99 and 50:50, v/v, for AHA and DAM respectively),
adjusted to pH 2 by phosphoric acid, was used as the eluent. The flow
rate was set to 0.7 mL/min and the column was kept at 35 ◦C. Detection
was performed at 210 nm, using a UV detector.
Keeping in mind the high toxicity of VX which requires special safety
measures, and the fact that 11 candidate APIs multiplied by 3–4 po-
tential cations (both organic and inorganic), all multiplied by a few
possible vehicles, would form a matrix of ca. dozens of kinetic experi-
ments, we decided to reduce the list of possible API’s by initially
examining their nucleophilic capabilities towards model OP’s. These
2.9. Data treatment and statistical analysis
Quantification of the nucleophiles was done using calibration curves,
which were generated for each salt by injecting known standard solu-
tions of the salts in PBS. The slopes were calculated from all the curves
4