was inserted between C-12 and C-13 to form a seven-
membered ring C. The detailed interpretation of HMBC
correlations (Figure 1) allowed the establishment of the
planar structure of 1.
Ilelic acid B (2) showed the same molecular formula as 1
by its HR-ESI-MS (m/z 495.3448 [MþNa]þ; calcd for
C30H48O4Na: 495.3444). The IR spectrum of 2 was also
similar to that of 1. The 1H NMR spectrum of 2 exhibited
signals for six tertiary methyls at δH 1.24, 1.03, 0.95, 1.09,
0.91, and 0.94 (each 3H, s), as well as two oxygenated
methine protons at δH 3.45 (1H, dd, J = 9.0, 6.9 Hz) and
4.52 (1H, m). The 13C NMR and DEPT spectra displayed
30 signals for 6 methyls, 11 methylenes, 5 methines, and 8
quaternary carbons. Comparison of the NMR data of 2
with those of 1 (Table 1) revealed that most of signals were
similar, except for the signals due to ring E. In the HMBC
spectrum of 2, the correlations between Me-29 (δH 0.91)/
Me-30 (δH 0.94) and C-19 (δC 41.7), C-20 (δC 30.7),
and C-21 (δC 34.8) were observed, indicating that Me-29
and Me-30 were both connected to C-20. A comprehensive
In order to determine the relative configuration of 1, the
ROESY spectrum was extensively analyzed. The ROESY
correlations between H-1R and H-5, between H-5 and H-9,
between Me-25 and Me-26, and between H-18 and Me-29
indicated that 1 possessed the same A/B trans, B/C trans,
and D/E cis ring junctions as usual ursanes (Figure 2). In
addition, the ROESY correlations between H-3 and H-5,
between H-12 and Me-26, and between H-12 and H-27β
suggested the presence of 3β-OH and 12R-OH (Figure 2).
Subsequently, the modified Mosher’s method was applied
to determine the absolute configuration of 1.13,14 Compar-
ison of the 1H NMR chemical shifts between (S)- and (R)-
MTPA diesters of 1 (Figure 3) led to the assignment of S
configurations of C-3 and C-12, respectively. Thus, the
configurations of 1 were assigned as 3S, 5R, 8R, 9R, 10R,
12S, 17S, 18S, 19S, and 20R, respectively. Ilelic acid A (1)
represents a new class of pentacyclic triterpenoid derived
from ursolic acid. The name “Ilesane” was proposed for
this type of triterpenoid.
1
analysis of the 1Hꢀ H COSY, HSQC, HMBC, and ROESY
spectraallowed the assignment of NMR dataof2 asshown
in Table 1. The carbon skeleton of 2 belonged to a unique
dubosane-type triterpene. The first example of this skele-
ton, duboscic acid, had been recently reported with a
relative configuration.9 As in the case of 1, the result of
the modified Mosher’s method suggested that the absolute
configurations of C-3 and C-12 of 2 were both S (Figure 3).
Therefore, the structure of 2 was established, and the
absolute configurations were assigned as 3S, 5R, 8R, 9R,
10R, 12S, 17R, and 18S, respectively.
Oleanolic acid and ursolic acid are the most common
triterpenes occurring in natural plant populations. Based
on the plausible biogenetic pathway of duboscic acid,9 2
could be derived from oleanolic acid (9) by oxygenation
and migration of C-27 methyl, forming a seven-membered
ring C. Similarly, ilelic acid A (1) could be derived from
ursolic acid (8) by the same procedure (Scheme 1). It is
noteworthy that the key intermediates 6ꢀ7, which could
easily form the C-27 carbocations, and several biosynthetic
related hexacyclic triterpenoids (3ꢀ5) were also found in
the same plant,10 rationalized the proposed biogenetic
pathway. In addition, compound 4 could be formed by
β-attack of the incoming nucleophile, in which the partial
bond between C-12 and C-27 was broken under kinetic
control, while compounds 1 and 2 should be produced by
R-attack of the nucleophile with breaking of the partial
bond between C-12 and C-13 under thermodynamic
control.15
Figure 2. Key ROESY correlations of 1.
The growth inhibitory activities of these triterpenoids
(1ꢀ4, 6, and 7) were evaluated in human breast cancer cells
MCF-7 (estrogen receptor-positive) and MDA-MB-231
(estrogen receptor-negative). Compounds 1 and 2 showed
a growth inhibitory effect against MCF-7 cells with IC50
values of 29.51 ( 3.44 and 38.49 ( 3.16 μM, respectively.
Compound 7 was the most potent among all tested com-
pounds with IC50 values of 12.65 ( 0.94 and 4.58 ( 0.56 μM,
respectively, indicating that the p-(E)-coumaroyl moiety
at the C-27 position may contribute to improving the growth
inhibitory potential, when compared with the triterpene
with the p-(Z)-coumaroyl moiety (6) (see Supporting
Figure 3. Δδ values (ΔS ꢀ ΔR) for the MTPA diesters of 1 and 2.
(13) Dale, J. A.; Mosher, H. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 512–519.
(14) Wang, L.; Yin, Z. Q.; Zhang, Q. W.; Zhang, X. Q.; Zhang, D. M.;
Liu, K.; Li, Y. L.; Yao, X. S.; Ye, W. C. Steroids 2011, 76, 238–243.
(15) Tadanier, J. J. Org. Chem. 1966, 31, 2124–2135.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 16, 2012
4104