A Straightforward Approach to Construct Spirocyclic Oxindoles
tested. Electron-withdrawing substituents on para-
positions afforded better yields and enantioselectivities
than electron-donating one (Table 3, Entries 2, 6 vs. 8).
The electron-withdrawing substuents on para- and
mtea-positions gave good to excellent yields (68%—
98%). The asymmetric dienones were also tested (Table
3, Entries 9—15). Both electron-withdrawing (Table 3,
Entries 9—12, 15) and electron-donating (Table 3,
Entries 13—14) substituents on dienones were tolerated.
Good yields and moderate to good enantioselectivities
were obtained (72% —96% yield, 51% — 89% ee),
whereas low disastereoselectivities were attained except
para-nitro group substituted (Table 3, Entries 9—14 vs.
15).
By tuning the stoichiometry of 2a to 3a, a significant
improvement of conversion was observed (Table 2,
Entries 11—14). Excessive amounts of dienones 3a
were unfavorable (Table 2, Entries 4 vs. 11 and 12). By
contrast, excessive oxindole 2a gave better yields, and
slightly affected the enantioselectivties (Table 2, Entries
4 vs. 13—14). When the reaction was conducted with
the molecular ratio of 2/1 reactants 2a/3a in toluene at
-30 ℃ for 96 h, the best result was obtained (84%
yield and 86% ee, Table 2, Entry 15).
With the established reaction conditions, the scope
of the substrates was finally investigated (Table 3). The
symmetric dienones were first evaluated and afforded
the desired adducts in moderate to excellent yields and
enantioselectivities (up to 98% yield, up to 86% ee).
The position of substituents on phenyl ring of dienones
delivered significant influences on the enantioselec-
tivities and yields. Unsubstituted benzene ring afforded
better yield and enantioselectivity than the substituted
ones (Table 3, Entry 1 vs. Entries 2—8). ortho-
Substituent gave low yield and enantioselectivity (37%
yield and 36% ee, Table 3, Entry 5). para-Substituents
afforded better ee values than meta- and ortho-
substituted ones (Table 3, Entries 2 vs. 3, 4 vs. 5, 6 vs.
7). The electronic features of the substitutents were also
Conclusions
In summary, chiral monoimide protected cyclohex-
ane-1,2-diamines were first successfully applied to
catalyze enantioselective double Michael reaction of
N-Boc-3-nonsubstitued oxindoles and dienones and a
wide range of optically active spirocyclic oxindoles
were obtained up to 98% yield and up to 89% ee.
Further studying of the catalytic mechanism of those
special chiral monoimide-1,2-diamines is going on in
our laboratory.
Table 3 Scope of substratea
Acknowledgement
O
O
This work was supported by National Natural Sci-
ence Foundation of China (Nos. 20802075, 21042006).
R1
1b (20 mol%)
O +
R2
O
R2
R1
N
Boc
-30 oC, Toluene
96 h
2a
3
N
References and Note
Boc
4
[1] Selected examples: (a) Dounay, A. B.; Overman, L. E. Chem. Rev.
2003, 103, 2945; (b) Lin, H.; Danishefsky, S. J. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2003, 42, 36; (c) Ma, S.; Han, X. Q.; Krishnan, S.; Virgil, S. C.;
Stoltz, B. M. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 8037.
[2] Selected examples: (a) Venkatesan, H.; Davis, M. C.; Altas, Y.;
Snyder, J. P.; Liotta, D. C. J. Org. Chem. 2001, 66, 3653; (b) Bignan,
G. C.; Battista, K.; Connolly, P. J.; Orsini, M. J.; Liu, J. C.;
Middleton, S. A.; Reitz, A. B. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2005, 15,
5022; (c) Zhao, L. Q.; Zhou, B.; Li, Y. Q. Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2011,
31, 553 (in Chinese).
[3] For selected reviews: (a) Marti, C.; Carreira, E. M. Eur. J. Org.
Chem. 2003, 2209; (b) Galliford, C. V.; Scheidt, K. A. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 8748; (c) Zhou, F.; Liu, Y. L.; Zhou, J.
Adv. Synth. Catal. 2010, 352, 1381; (d) Guo, H. Y.; Tian, J. J. Chin.
J. Org. Chem. 2011, 31, 752.
[4] Bencivenni, G.; Wu, L. Y.; Mazzanti, A.; Giannichi, B.; Pesciaioli,
F.; Song, M. P.; Bartoli, G.; Melchiorre, P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2009, 48, 7200.
[5] (a) Chen, X. H.; Wei, Q.; Xiao, H.; Luo, S. W.; Gong, L. Z. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 13819; (b) Wei, Q.; Gong, L. Z. Org. Lett.
2010, 12, 1008.
[6] (a) Jiang, K.; Jia, Z. J.; Chen, S.; Wu, L.; Chen, Y. C. Chem.-Eur. J.
2010, 16, 2852; (b) Jiang, K.; Jia, Z. J.; Yin, X.; Wu, L.; Chen, Y. C.
Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 2766.
[7] (a) Chen, W. B.; Wu, Z. J.; Pei, Q. L.; Cun, L. F.; Zhang, X. M.;
Yuan, W. C. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 3132; (b) Chen, W. B.; Wu, Z. J.;
Hu, J.; Cun, L. F.; Zhang, X. M.; Yuan, W. C. Org. Lett. 2011, 13,
2472.
Entry
R1
R2
Ph
Yieldb/% drc eed/%
1
2
Ph
4a/84
4b/98
4c/97
4d/91
4e/37
4f/68
4g/86
4h/20
4i/85e
4j/83e
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
nd
86
74
55
48
36
83
60
59
4-FC6H4
3-FC6H4
4-FC6H4
3
3-FC6H4
4
3-ClC6H4
2-ClC6H4
4-BrC6H4
3-BrC6H4
4-MeC6H4
Ph
3-ClC6H4
2-ClC6H4
4-BrC6H4
3-BrC6H4
4-MeC6H4
3-FC6H4
5
6
7
8
9
1.5/1 51/53
10
11
12
13
14
15
Ph
4-BrC6H4
3-BrC6H4
4-CF3C6H4
4-MeC6H4
3-MeC6H4
5.7/1 83/66
Ph
4k/89e 1.8/1 73/78
4l/74e
3.3/1 63/53
4m/72e 1.3/1 87/83
4n/96e 1.3/1 79/73
Ph
Ph
Ph
Ph
4-NO2C6H4 4o/93e 13/1 89/82
a
Unless otherwise noted, the reaction was conducted with 0.4
mmol 2a, 0. 2 mmol 3, 20 mol% 1b in 1.0 mL toluene at -30
℃ for 96 h. Isolated yield. Measured by chiral HPLC. The
corresponding ee value was measured by chiral HPLC. e The total
yield of isomers.
b
c
d
[8] (a) Jiang, X. X.; Cao, Y. M.; Wang, Y. Q.; Liu, L. P.; Shen, F. F.;
Chin. J. Chem. 2012, 30, 1185—1188
© 2012 SIOC, CAS, Shanghai, & WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
1187