SA. Moya et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 22 (2012) 146–148
147
Table 1
Catalytic activity in hydrogen transfer reaction of acetophenone.
Conversion (%); (TOF h−1
30 60 90
91; (1820) 96; (960) 98; (653) 99; (495)
Run Catalyst/time (minutes)
)
120
1
Ru(dppz)(PPh3)2Cl2 (1)
Ru(dppz-cl)(PPh3)2Cl2 (2) 56; (1120) 67; (670) 74; (493) 78; (390)
Scheme 1. Hydrogenation of N-benzylideneaniline by a new ruthenium (II) complex
derivated from polypyridine ligands.
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ru(phen)(PPh3)2Cl2 (3)
Ru(bpy)(PPh3)2Cl2 (4)
Ru(bpy)(CO)2Cl2 (5)
Ru(phen)(CO)2Cl2 (6)
Ru(dppz)(CO)2Cl2 (7)
Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 (8)
50; (1000) 56; (560) 59; (393) 63; (315)
96; (1920) 97; (970) 99; (660) 99; (495)
64; (1280) 90; (900) 96; (640) 97; (485)
74; (1480) 93; (930) 95; (633) 98; (490)
97; (1940) 98; (980) 99; (660) 99; (495)
(3) [14] trans-PPh3-[Ru(phen)(PPh3)2Cl2 [15] (4) were synthesized
from Ru(PPh3)3Cl2.1 The complex Ru(bpy)2Cl2 and Ru(phen)2Cl2 were
synthesized using the procedure reported in the literature[16]. The N-
benzylideneaniline hydrogenation was conducted using iso-propanol
in a basic medium with a ratio of substrate/catalyst=400 and a ratio
of KOH/Ru=20. A similar procedure was used in the transfer hydroge-
nation reaction of acetophenone with a ratio substrate/catalyst=1000/
1. All experiments were analyzed by GC‐chromatography2 using a HP-5
column.
2; (40)
3; (30)
3; (20)
3; (15)
9
10
11
[Ru(CO)2Cl2]n (9)
Ru(phen)2Cl2 (10)
Ru(bpy)2Cl2 (11)
10 (200)
No active
No active
14 (140) 19; (126) 24; (120)
Substrate/ruthenium=1000; solvent=2-propanol; base/ruthenium=20.
have shown activities near 99%, however compound 3 shows 63%.
This is the consequence of an increased electron density on the
metal provided by the polypiridine ligand. On the other hand the com-
pounds Ru(bpy)2Cl2 and Ru(phen)2Cl2 were not active catalysts in the
hydrogen transfer of acetophenone maybe because the lower solubil-
ity of complexes or the steric effect did not allow the formation of the
hydride–ruthenium complex.
Table 2 shows the catalytic activity of compounds of ruthenium (II)
with polypyridine ligands in the hydrogenation of N-benzylideneaniline.
Conversions range from 56 to 86% after 30 min of reaction (entries
1–6). When comparing the catalytic activity of the compounds
Ru(dppz)(PPh3)2Cl2 and Ru(dppz-Cl)(PPh3)2Cl2 a reverse situation is ob-
served compared to that seen in the hydrogen transfer reaction of
acetophenone; in this case the activity of Ru(dppz-Cl)(PPh3)2Cl2 is better
than the one observed for Ru(dppz)(PPh3)2Cl2. These results seem to be
contradictory, as both catalytic processes of metal hydride formation are
fundamental to the reaction and this intermediate is strongly favored by
the presence of donor ligands. However, since the imine is basic it will
react more rapidly with the more acidic metal, in this case with the com-
plex containing the dppz-Cl ligand.
When the activities of complexes 1, 3 and 4 are compared, it can
be seen that the activity showed by complex 1 is better than that of
complex 3 and both have much better activity than complex 4. Even
though the three different nitrogen ligands provide electronic effects,
the differences observed in the activities cannot be rationalized on
the basis of the small differences of the electronic effects. Probably
the differences in the catalytic activities of these complexes are the
consequence of the size of the nitrogen ligands. The higher the size
of the ligands the less stable the formed complex becomes. Thus,
the ligands dppz and phen should not form a very stable bond in
RuCl2(PPh3)3 reacted with one equivalent of dppz, bpy and phen li-
gands, in dichloromethane at room temperature, with high yield. The
paternal signals in 1H-NMR and 31P-NMR confirm the structure pro-
posed for these compounds and for the complexes and they are in accor-
dance with the elemental analysis and the IR spectrum. The complexes
trans-PPh3-[Ru(bpy)(PPh3)2Cl2, trans-PPh3-[Ru(phen)(PPh3)2Cl2 trans-
PPh3-[Ru(dppz)(PPh3)2Cl2 and trans-PPh3-[Ru(dppz-Cl)(PPh3)2Cl2
were obtained in high yield. The compounds were obtained in an oc-
tahedral coordination with the phosphine group appearing in a trans-
configuration which was confirmed by 31P-NMR. The complexes
Ru(bpy)(CO)2Cl2 and Ru(phen)(CO)2Cl2 and Ru(dppz)(CO)2Cl2 used
in this work show the paternal signal similar to those reported previous-
ly by us [13]. The compounds were studied as catalysts in the transfer
hydrogenation reaction of imine and ketone.
Table 1 shows the catalytic activity in the hydrogen transfer reac-
tion of acetophenone catalyzed by compounds of ruthenium (II)
with polypyridine ligands. The activities displayed by these com-
pounds vary between 50 and 97 in 30 min of reaction (entries 1–7).
When comparing the catalytic activity of these compounds with the
precursors Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 and [Ru(CO)2(Cl)2]n (entries 8–9) used for
the synthesis of the complexes, it was observed that the catalytic ac-
tivity increased significantly with the presence of a polypyridine li-
gand in the coordination sphere of the metal. The presence of the
polypyridine ligand stabilizes the metal in catalytic conditions thus
enabling the reaction that forms ruthenium hydride, which is the ac-
tive species for this reaction. The compounds Ru(dppz)(PPh3)2Cl2
and Ru(bpy)(PPh3)2Cl2 and Ru(dppz)(CO)2Cl2 were the most active
after 30 min of reaction. After 2 h of reactions, complexes 1, 4–7
1
Synthesis of the complexes. Trans-PPh3-[Ru(dppz)(PPh3)2Cl2 (1). Ru(PPh3)2Cl2
(0.1 g, 1.0 mmol) and dipyrido[3,2-a:2′,3′-c]phenazine (0.029 g, 1.11 mmol) dis-
solved in chloroform, (20 mL) were placed into a round bottom flask. The mixture
was stirred for 30 min. The solution was precipitated with ethyl ether; the solid
obtained was filtered and washed with hexane and ethyl ether. The product was rec-
rystallized (chloroform/ethyl ether). 1H-NMR (δ (ppm) CDCl3): 9.3 (s, 1H), 8.4 (dd,
6 Hz, 4H), 8.0 (dd, 6 Hz, 4H), 7.1–6.9 (m, PPh3). Anal. Calc. (%): for C54H40N4Cl2N4P2-
Ru: C, 66.26; H, 4.12; N, 5.72. Found (%) C, 66.33; H, 4.38; N, 4.98. Yield 65%. Trans-
PPh3-[Ru(dppz-Cl)(PPh3)2Cl2 (2). This compound was prepared by the same proce-
dure used for the synthesis of trans-PPh3-[Ru(dppz)(PPh3)2Cl2. 1H-NMR (δ (ppm)
CDCl3): 9.1 (s, 2H), 9.0 (d, 7.7 Hz, 2H), 8.4 (s, 1H), 8.3 (d, 9.1 Hz, 1H) 7.9 (d, 9.1 Hz,
1H) 7.4–7.0 (m, PPh3). Anal. Calc. (%): for C54H39Cl3N4P2Ru: C, 64.01; H, 3.88; N,
5.53. Found (%) C, 64.21; H, 3.83; N, 5.21. Yield 70%.
Table 2
Catalytic activity in the hydrogenation of N-benzylideneaniline.
Run Catalyst/time (minutes)
Conversion (%) (TOF h−1
30 60 90
60; (480) 72; (288) 76; (202) 83; (166)
Ru(dppz-cl)(PPh3)2Cl2 (2) 75; (600) 83; (332) 85; (226) 88; (176)
)
120
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Ru(dppz)(PPh3)2Cl2 (1)
Ru(phen)(PPh3)2Cl2 (3)
Ru(bpy)(PPh3)2Cl2 (4)
Ru(bpy)(CO)2Cl2 (5)
Ru(phen)(CO)2Cl2 (6)
Ru(dppz)(CO)2Cl2 (7)
Ru(PPh3)3Cl2 (8)
56; (448) 60; (240) 64; (171) 69; (138)
–
–
–
b5a
65; (520) 77; (308) 83; (221) 88; (176)
86; (688) 88; (352) 90; (240) 91; (182)
2
Catalytic hydrogenation. The catalyst precursor (0.012 mmol) was dissolved in 2-
3; (24)
5; (20)
12; (32)
21; (42)b
propanol (8 mL), and the solution was refluxed. After 10 min, a distilled amine com-
pound (10 mmol) was added. After 10 min, the transfer hydrogenation reaction was
initiated by addition of sodium hydroxide (9.9 mg, 0.24 mmol) dissolved in 2-
propanol (1 mL). The progress of the reaction was monitored by gas chromatography
with periodic sampling every 10 min. Gas chromatographic analysis was carried out
with a Perkin Elmer 8500P instrument equipped with FID, using a Carbowax 20 M col-
umn and nitrogen as carrier gas. GC-Mass spectra were carried in order to confirm the
identity of products in a MAT 95 XP Thermo Electron.
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
10
11
[Ru(CO)2Cl2]n (9)
0
Ru(phen)2Cl2 (10)
Ru(bpy)2Cl2 (11)
b5
b5
Substrate/ruthenium=400; solvent=2-propanol; base/ruthenium=20;
a
The conversion increase after 10 h to 82%.
The conversion increase after 10 h to 78%.
b