and therefore its identification must be considered tenta-
tive. We have been interested in the secondary metabolites
of L. canum and their ecological functions because of its
uniqueness as a large woody Labiatae with colored nectar
and have found that the glandular trichomes of L. canum
harbor defensive sesterterpenoids with a novel C25 carbon
framework.6 To discover the pigmented compounds re-
sponsible for the colored nectar of L. canum and their
ecological significance, we initiated an investigation three
years ago and recently purified the major pigment and
unambiguously determined its chemical structure with
comprehensive spectroscopic analyses, especially 1D and
2D NMR and HRMS, and chemical synthesis. With the
purified and synthetic authentic samples, we were also able
to conduct behavioral experiments on a bird pollinator of
L. canum.
L. canum blooms from early December to late March of
the next year, and each plant can produce hundreds of
inflorescences and thousands of white tubular flowers
(Figure 1aꢀd). The tubular flowers are filled with dark
browncolored nectar(Figure 1d) inthe morning. The most
common visitors are Japanese White-eye (Zosterops
japonicus) (Figure 1a), Blue Winged Minla (Minla
cyanouroptera) (Figure 1b), and Black-headed Sibia
(Heterophasia melanoleuca) (Figure 1c) based on our
own field observations. Large scale HPLC analysis of
109 nectar samples collected from the Botanical Garden
of Kunming Institute of Botany and Dehong with a
detection wavelength of 400 nm indicated that all sam-
ples contained a predominant peak with maximum UV
absorptions at 215, 369, and 525 nm (Figure S1), which
was accordingly targeted as the responsible pigmented
compound of the dark brown nectar of L. canum. How-
ever, when we started to isolate this compound for
spectroscopic identification and subsequent behavioral
experiments, it was found to be so unstable that isola-
tion and identification were very difficult. After two
years of effort, we were finally able to obtain a 27.5 mg
sample of this compound with sufficient purity for
identification as a dark brown solid from 645 mL of
L. canum nectar.
Figure 1. Leucosceptrum canum and its flower visitors. (a)
Japanese White-eye (Zosterops japonicus); (b) Minla cyanour-
optera; (c) Heterophasia melanoleuca; (d) Dark brown nectar
of L. canum; (e) Chemical structure of 2,5-di-(N-prolyl)-para-
benzoquinone (DPBQ); (f) Japanese White-eye probes
DPBQ (500 μg/mL) in the behavioral experiments.
(Figure S4), which were further classified by DEPT experi-
ments as three methylenes, two methines including an
olefinic one (δC 100.1), and three quaternary carbons
including an olefinic one (δC 148.6) and two carbonyl
1
carbons (δC 179.9, and 173.4). Its H NMR spectrum
(Figure S3) displayed seven groups of signals, including
an olefinic singlet at δH 5.23, a broad doublet at δH 4.99, a
two-proton multiplet at δH 3.35, and four multiplets at δH
1.78ꢀ2.21, which were readily assigned to the correspond-
ing methylene and methine carbons through a hetero-
nuclear single-quantum correlation (HSQC) experiment
1
1
(Figure S6). The Hꢀ H COSY correlations (Figure S5)
established a fragment of ꢀCHCH2CH2CH2ꢀ with the
terminal protons and carbons occurring relatively down-
field, suggesting the existence of a tetrahydropyrrole moi-
ety, which was substituted by a carboxylic group at C-20
The pigmented compound was shown to have a mole-
cular formula of C16H18N2O6 by positive and negative ESI
mass spectrometry and high-resolution ESI-MS.7 Eight
carbon resonances were found in its 13C NMR spectrum
1
13
owing to the Hꢀ C long-range correlations from H-20
and H2-30 to the carbonyl carbon at δC 173.4 in the
heteronuclear multiple bond coherence (HMBC) spectrum
(Figure S7). Thus a proline unit was evident in the struc-
ture. The remaining signals in the NMR spectra were
ascribable to an R,β-unsaturated keto residue, which was
attached to the nitrogen of proline because of the HMBC
correlations from H-20 and H2-50 to the olefinic quaternary
carbon and ROESY correlation between H-3/H-6 and
H-20 (Figure S8). In the HMBC spectrum (Figure S7), an
(6) Luo, S. H.; Luo, Q.; Niu, X. M.; Xie, M. J.; Zhao, X.; Schneider,
B.; Gershenzon, J.; Li, S. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 4471–4475.
(7) Natural DPBQ:Dark brown solid;[R]D25 =ꢀ46.4 (c = 0.1, water);
UV/vis (water): λmax (log ε) 215 (3.55), 369 (3.37), 525 (2.10) nm; IR (KBr):
ν
max 3426, 2978, 1624, 1540, 1411, 1385, 1290, 1187, 1009 cmꢀ1; Positive
ESI-MS: m/z (%) 357 (7) [MþNa]þ, 335 (5) [MþH]þ, 317 (9), 301 (40),
219 (31), 203 (100); Neꢀgative ESI-MS: m/z (%) 355ꢀ(42) [MþNaꢀ2H]ꢀ,
289 (100) [MꢀCOOH] , 243 (41) [Mꢀ2COOHꢀH] , 217 (29), 215 (77);
HR-ESI-MS: m/z 335.1169 [MþH]þ (m/zcalcd [C16H19N2O6]þ
=
4
unusual J coupling from the proton at δH 5.23 to the
335.1238); 357.1060 [MþNa]þ (m/zcalcd [C16H18N2O6Na]þ = 357.1057);
1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 5.23 (s, 2H, H-3 and H-6), 4.99 (brd,
J=5.4Hz,2H,H2-20), 2.20(m, 2H,H2-30a), 2.00 (m, 2H, H2-30b), 1.89 (m,
2H, H2-40a), 1.78 (m, 2H, H2-40b), 3.35 (m, 4H, H4-50); 13C NMR (150
MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 179.9 (s, 2C, C-1 and C-4), 173.4 (s, 2C, C2-60), 148.6
(s, 2C, C-2 and C-5), 100.1 (d, 2C, C-3 and C-6), 62.6 (d, 2C, C2-20), 51.1 (t,
2C, C2-50), 31.1 (t, 2C, C2-30), 21.6 (t, 2C, C2-40). Synthetic (ꢀ)-DPBQ:
Dark brown solid; [R]D19 = ꢀ41.1 (c = 0.1, water). Synthetic (þ)-DPBQ:
Dark brown solid; [R]D19 = þ58.3 (c = 0.1, water).
carbon at δC 100.1 (from H-3 to C-6 and from H-6 to C-3)
was also observed, indicating a symmetric structure for the
compound. Considering its above molecular formula, the
compound was straightforwardly established to be either
2,5-di-(N-prolyl)-para-benzoquinone or 2,5-di-(N-prolyl)-
ortho-benzoquinone. However, it is difficult to distinguish
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 16, 2012
4147