Molecules 2009, 14
4194
116.0 (d, C-3', 5'), 105.4 (s, C-10), 103.1 (d, C-3), 99.9 (d, C-1''), 99.5 (d, C-6), 94.8 (d, C-8), 77.2 (d,
C-3''), 76.3 (d, C-5''), 73.1 (d, C-2''), 69.5 (d, C-4''), 60.6 (t, C-6''); HR-FAB-MS (neg.): 431.1280 [M-
H]- (calcd. for C21H19O10 431.1102).
Compound 2: Yellow amorphous powder. UV-Visible λmax (nm) MeOH: 256, 267, 346; IR (KBr, cm-
1
1): 3,450, 2,920, 1,650, 1,573, 1,515, 990-600; H-NMR (500 MHz, MeOH+DMSO-d6): 7.40 (d, J =
1.9 Hz, H2'), 6.95 (d, J = 1.9 Hz, H6'), 6.78 (s, H3), 6.61 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, H6), 6.48 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, H8),
5.16 (br t, J = 6.7 Hz, H2'''), 5.08 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, H1''), 3.78-4.40 (m, H2'', H3'', H4'', H5''), 3.62 (m,
H1'''), 1.68 (s, H5'''), 1.62 (s, H4''') ppm; 13C-NMR (125 MHz, MeOH+DMSO-d6): 183.7 (s, C-4),
166.7 (s, C-7), 162.1 (s, C-5), 158.9 (s, C-9), 151.1 (s, C-4'), 147.3 (s, C-3'), 130.1 (s, C-3'''), 123.7 (s,
C-1'), 127.1 (s, C-5'), 122.1 (s, C-2'''), 117.6 (d, C-6'), 114.6 (d, C-2'), 107.1 (s, C-10), 104.5 (s, C-3),
101.9 (d, C-1''), 101.0 (d, C-6), 96.1 (d, C-8), 78.5 (d, C-3''), 77.9 (d, C-5''), 74.7 (d, C-2''), 71.2 (d, C-
4''), 62.9 (t, C-6''), 28.4 (t, C-1'''), 25.6 (q, C-5'''), 17.8 (q, C-4'''); HR-FAB-MS (neg.): 515.1913 [M-H]-
(calcd for C26H27O11 515. 1657).
3.4. Enzymatic hydrolysis of compounds 1 and 2
An aqueous solution of 1 (3 mg) and maltase (1 mg) was incubated at 37 °C for 80 h. The solution
was extracted with CHCl3 and aglycone produced was identified as apigenin by comparison with
compound 6 on silica gel TLC using CHCl3-MeOH-H2O (8:2:0.2), Rf = 0.68. The aqueous layer was
concentrated to a residue, which was dissolved by water and examined for identification of the
component sugar, and D-glucose was identified by direct comparison on silica gel TLC with an
authentic sample, using CHCl3-MeOH-H2O (7:3:0.5). Rf = 0.23.
A solution of 2 (2 mg) in H2O (1 mL) were treated with crude cellulase (7 mg) at 37 °C for 60 h.
The reaction mixture was diluted with H2O (2 mL), and extracted with CHCl3 (3 mL × 2). The aqueous
layer was concentrated to a residue, which was dissolved by water and examined for identification of
the component sugar, and D-glucose was identified by direct comparison on silica gel TLC with an
authentic sample, using CHCl3-MeOH-H2O (7:3:0.5). Rf = 0.23.
4. Conclusions
A detailed phytochemical investigation on E. rugulosa led to the isolation of two new flavonoid
glycosides, apigenin 4'-O-α-D-glucopyranoside (1) and 5,7,3',4'-tetrahydroxy-5'-C-prenylflavone-7-O-
β-D-glucopyranoside (2), together with nine known compounds (3-11). Among them, compounds 7-10
were isolated for the first time from E. rugulosa.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the staffs of the analytical group at State Key Laboratory of
Phytochemistry and Plant Resources in West China, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy
of Sciences, for measuring the spectral data.