158
H. Elayadi et al. / Catalysis Communications 26 (2012) 155–158
Table 3
4. Conclusion
Results for one‐pot tandem reactions.
Yield %a
61
In conclusion, the CuO nano acts as an efficient and recyclable cat-
Entry
29
Alkyne
alyst for the 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition of organic and sugar azides
with terminal alkynes and propargyl nucleobases, and allows the syn-
thesis of 1,2,3-triazole acyclic nucleosides. The one-pot reaction has
been performed efficiently to provide the desired products in good
yields.
The simple experimental procedure, mild reaction conditions, in-
expensive and recyclable catalyst, short reaction times and good
yields are the advantages of the procedure.
30
31
55
58
Conditions: azide (1, 1 mmol), alkynes (1 mmol), CuO (0,05 mmol), solvent: Dioxane
(3 mL), 90 °C, 3 h.
Acknowledgment
a
Isolated yield.
We thank Dr. S. Ananthan (Southern Research Institute Birming-
ham Alabama, USA) for his interest to this work and for his helpful
discussion.
of the catalyst CuO nano was also examined. The result showed that
5% of CuO nano was the optimum amount of the catalyst (Table 1,
entry 3).
Under the present reaction conditions, CuO (Scheme 2) nanopar-
ticle catalyst was also found to be reusable, although gradual decline
of activity was observed. The catalyst was separated by filtration,
washed with water, ethanol and acetone and dried at 100 °C over-
night before reuse. Such a procedure when applied for the 1,3-dipolar
cycloaddition of 1 to 2 gave the product in 59% yield in the second
run. The comparison of efficiency of catalyst on repeated use is
reported in Fig. 3. The gradual decrease of catalytic activity is proba-
bly due to the agglomeration of nanoparticles in the reaction medi-
um, acting negatively on the substrate–catalyst contact surface. This
is visualized by the increase of crystallite size from 4 nm to 14 nm
after the fourth cycle of the catalyst.
References
[1] C.W. Tornoe, C. Christensen, M. Meldal, The Journal of Organic Chemistry 67
(2002) 3057–3064.
[2] V.V. Rostovtev, L.G. Green, V.V. Fokin, K.B. Sharpless, Angewandte Chemie Inter-
national Edition 41 (2002) 2596–2599.
[3] H.C. Kolb, K.B. Sharpless, Drug Discovery Today 24 (2003) 1128–1137.
[4] H.C. Kolb, M.G. Finn, K.B. Sharpless, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 40
(2001) 2004–2021.
[5] M. Meldal, C.W. Tornoe, Chemical Reviews 108 (2008) 2952–3015.
[6] G.C. Tron, T. Pirali, R.A. Billigton, P.L. Canonico, G. Sorba, A.A. Gennazzani, Medic-
inal Research Reviews 28 (2008) 278–308.
[7] J.-F. Lutz, Z. Zarafshani, Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews 60 (2008) 958–970.
[8] S. Chassaing, A.S. Kumarraja, S. Sido, P. Pale, J. Sommer, Organic Letters 9 (2007)
883–886.
X-ray fluorescence study of aqueous reaction mixture after filtra-
tion shows that there were any traces of copper found in the solution.
This result confirms that the reaction was heterogeneous and occur-
ring in the surface of nanoparticle and there was no leaching of
metal species involved during the reaction.
[9] B.H. Lipshutz, B.R. Taft, Angewandte Chemie International Edition 45 (2006)
8235–8238.
[10] H.A. Orgueira, D. Fokas, Y. Isome, C.M. Bardino, Tetrahedron Letters 46 (2005)
2911–2914.
[11] V.O. Rodionov, S.I. Presolski, S. Cardinier, Y.L. Lim, M.G. Finn, Journal of the Amer-
ican Chemical Society 129 (2007) 12696–12704.
[12] T. Miao, L. Wang, Synthesis (2008) 363–368.
The scope of the present CuO nanocatalyst promoted 1,3-dipolar cy-
cloaddition is summarized in Table 2. Various combination of substrates
(three organic azides and seven terminal alkynes) were investigated
and all the reactions efficiently proceed to give the corresponding 1,4-
disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole derivatives in good isolated yield without
any additives such as reducing agents, base, and stabilizing ligands.
In order to prove the applicability of the reaction conditions
for synthesis of various 1,2,3-triazoles bearing pyrimidine het-
erocycle [16–21], we tested the methodology on a set of 1-
propargylpyrimidine. The 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition coupling of
sugar azide and 1-propargylpyrimidine took place with the
same efficiency like in the case of benzyl azide under the applied
conditions within 2 h.
[13] A. Sarkar, T. Mukherjee, S. Kapoor, Journal of Physical Chemistry C 112 (2008)
3334–3340.
[14] a) G. Rothenberg, Advanced Synthesis and Catalysis 347 (2005) 811–815;
b) B.M. Choudary, Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical 256 (2006) 273–277;
c) G. Molteni, C.L. Bianchi, G. Marinoni, N. Santo, A. Ponti, New Journal of Chemis-
try 30 (2006) 1137–1139;
d) K.H. Park, Chemical Communications 46 (2010) 439–441.
[15] H. Kang, H.J. Lee, J.C. Park, H. Song, K.H. Park, Topics in Catalysis 53 (2010)
523–528.
[16] Y. Kabbaj, H.B. Lazrek, J.L. Barascut, J.L. Imbach, Nucleosides, Nucleotides
&
Nucleic Acids 24 (2005) 161–172.
[17] N. Redwane, H.B. Lazrek, J.L. Barascut, J.L. Imbach, J. Balzarini, M. Witvrouw, E. De
Clerq, Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids 20 (2001) 1439–1447.
[18] a) H.B. Lazrek, A. Rochdi, H. Khaider, J.L. Barascut, J.L. Imbach, J. Balzarini, M.
Witvrouw, C. Pannecouque, E. De Clercq, Tetrahedron 54 (1998) 3807–3816;
b) H.B. Lazrek, M. Taourirte, T. Oulih, J.L. Barascut, J.L. Imbach, C. Pannecouque, M.
Witrouw, E. De Clercq, Nucleosides, Nucleotides
& Nucleic Acids 20 (2001)
Next, we studied the one-pot tandem [3+2] cycloaddition where
benzylchloride was reacted with propargyl derivatives and sodium
azide in the presence of CuO nanoparticles as catalyst in dioxane as
solvent (Scheme 3). The reaction mixture was refluxed for 3 h and
the products were isolated by simple purification using flash column
chromatography. As shown in Table 3, the one-pot reaction
proceeded efficiently to provide the desired products in good yields.
These results indicate that the three-component reaction constitutes
a powerful tool in 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reactions.
1949–1960.
[19] O. Moukha-chafiq, M.L. Taha, H.B. Lazrek, J.J. Vasseur, C. Pannecouque, M.
Witvrouw, E. De Clercq, Farmaco 57 (2002) 27–32.
[20] O. Moukha-chafiq, M.L. Taha, H.B. Lazrek, J.J. Vasseur, C. Pannecouque, M.
Witvrouw, E. De Clercq, Nucleosides, Nucleotides & Nucleic Acids 20 (2001)
1811–1821.
[21] H. Elayadi, M. Smietana, C. Pannecouque, P. Leyssen, J. Neyts, J.J. Vasseur, H.B.
Lazrek, Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 20 (2010) 7365–7368.
[22] H.P. Klug, L.E. Alexander, X-Ray Diffraction Procedures, 2nd edn, Wiley–Interscience,
New York, 1974, pp. 599–620.