Table 1. Optimization studies on the rearrangement of 3a.[a]
ring (D),[8] rather than a direct hydroarylation at the 3-posi-
tion of the furan, occurs. The attack at the 3-position would
position the Ar substituent at the 4-position of the benzo[b]-
furan product, which is not observed. This 5-endo-dig cycli-
zation to D is followed by a Wagner–Meerwein shift, leading
to E with a more stable carboxonium ion. Deprotonation
and protodeauration give the aromatic furan ring in F and
elimination of silanol creates the benzene ring in the final
product 2.[9]
The best catalyst for this transformation was the
[(IPr)AuNTf2] catalyst (NTf2 =bis(trifluoromethanesulfony-
l)imidate). The reactions proceeded conveniently at room
temperature in CH2Cl2 and no inert gas atmosphere was
necessary.
We now wanted to expand the synthetic impact of these
rare 2,3-shifts in five-membered heterocycles. This would
provide a convenient access to other anellated heterocyclic
systems, which also represent highly interesting targets. On
the other hand, from other reactions, like the gold-catalyzed
phenol synthesis, we had learned that a transfer to thio-
phenes, pyrroles, and related molecules might be challeng-
ing, if not impossible.[10]
Entry
Catalyst
[(PPh3)AuNTf2]
[(NAC)AuCl]/AgSbF6
[(SPhos)AuNTf2]
AuCl
AuCl3
Solvent
Time [h]
Yield [%]
1
2
3
4
5
G
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH2Cl2
CH3CN
THF
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
24
20
12
73
37
traces
95
n.r.
traces
n.r.
68
R
A
6[b]
7
8
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
U
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
9
C
iPrOH
CH2Cl2
10[c]
ACHTUNGTRENNUNG
[a] Reaction conditions: substrate (100 mmol), [Au] (2 mol%), [Ag]
(2 mol%), iPrOH (1.1 equiv), CH2Cl2 (2 mL), RT, in air. The reaction
was monitored by TLC. [b] Substrate (200 mmol). [c] 408C. NAC=nitro-
gen acylic carbene. n.r.=no reaction.
the temperature to 408C does lead to catalyst deactivation
rather than acceleration (entry 10).
Then, other substrates were subjected to the optimal reac-
tion conditions from Table 1 ([(IPr)AuCl] (2 mol%),
AgNTf2 (2 mol%), RT, CH2Cl2; Table 2). With the thio-
phene ring and either a phenyl (3a), a 3-bromophenyl (3b),
Results and Discussion
The substrates were easily accessible by addition of
in situ formed propargylic organozinc or Grignard
reagents to heteroaromatic aldehydes and subse-
quent silylation of the secondary alcohol and Sono-
gashira coupling.
Table 2. Scope and limitations of AuI-catalyzed rearrangement of 3-silyloxy-1,5-
enynes 3.[a]
Initially, we chose 3a as a model substrate to ex-
plore the feasibility and efficiency of the desired
transformation. With the sulfur-containing thio-
phene ring, compound 3a belongs to the most diffi-
cult substrate class. If this molecule can be convert-
ed, the reaction should be successful for most of
the other substrate types as well. Table 1 outlines
the results of the optimization experiments. The
catalyst, employed in this process, played a crucial
role, with the gold(I) complex of the N-heterocy-
clic carbene (NHC) ligand IPr being the most effi-
cient catalyst. To our delight, this catalyst gave the
anticipated product 4a in 95% isolated yield
(entry 6). [(SPhos)AuNTf2] (SPhos=2-Dicyclohex-
ylphosphino-2’,6’-dimethoxybiphenyl) was also ef-
fective, providing the same product in 73% yield
Entry Substrate
Products
Time
[h]
Yield
[%]
1
3a
3b
4a 24
95
99
2
3
4b 12
3c
4c 24
72
after 24 h (entry 3). However, goldACTHNUGRTENUNG(III) chloride
was less effective than gold(I) in terms of yield
(entry 5). After identifying an appropriate catalyst,
we optimized other critical reaction parameters,
such as solvent and temperature. In particular, the
transformation was strongly influenced by the sol-
vent. Polar solvents (CH3CN, THF, and iPrOH)
were not suitable for this transformation (en-
tries 7–9). Furthermore, the temperature effect was
also investigated and it turned out that increasing
4
5
3d
3e
4d
2
98
70
4e 120
&
2
&
ꢁ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
Chem. Eur. J. 0000, 00, 0 – 0
ÝÝ
These are not the final page numbers!