entangled nanofibers. Although this morphology of NDI-A3 in
MCH cannot be directly correlated with the thin film
morphology in the OFET devices, it could be used to illustrate
the reduced dimensionality of the hydrogen bonded molecules
NDI-A and NDI-A3 compared with their non-hydrogen bonded
ester analogues. Since the overall device performances of the
ester derivatives were better compared to the amides, it could be
concluded that hydrogen bonding in the amides proved to be
more restrictive compared to the more crystalline ester mole-
cules, which had more freedom to realign for efficient charge
transport.
References
1 A. Babel and S. A. Jenekhe, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 13656.
2 B. A. Jones, A. Facchetti, T. J. Marks and M. R. Wasielewski, Chem.
Mater., 2007, 19, 2703.
3 B. A. Jones, M. J. Ahrens, M.-H. Yoon, A. Facchetti, T. J. Marks and
M. R. Wasielewski, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2004, 43, 6363.
4 B. J. Jung, J. Sun, T. Lee, A. Sarjeant and H. E. Katz, Chem. Mater.,
2009, 21, 94.
5 C. Piliego, D. Jarzab, G. Gigli, Z. Chen, A. Facchetti and M. A. Loi,
Adv. Mater., 2009, 21, 1573.
6 K. C. See, C. Landis, A. Sarjeant and H. E. Katz, Chem. Mater., 2008,
20, 3609.
7 R. Schmidt, M. M. Ling, J. H. Oh, M. Winkler, M. Koenemann,
€
Z. Bao and F. Wurthner, Adv. Mater., 2007, 19, 3692.
8 S. Tatemichi, M. Ichikawa, T. Koyama and Y. Taniguchi, Appl. Phys.
Lett., 2006, 89, 112108.
9 T. D. Anthopoulos, B. Singh, N. Marjanovic, N. S. Sariciftci,
Conclusions
The present work described a full account of the synthesis,
characterization and molecular/thin film properties of two series
of naphthalene diimide (NDI) derivatives – one series had an
amide group linking a terminal phenyl or 3,4,5-tridodecyloxy
phenyl unit to a hexyl spacer substituted NDI core, while in the
other series the linkage was through an ester unit. The amide
linked NDI derivatives formed strong hydrogen bonded aggre-
gates with pronounced red shifted emission both in solution and
solid state. All the four NDI derivatives exhibited good n-type
charge transport characteristics in an OFET device in the bottom
gate top contact geometry with values ranging from 2 ꢀ 10ꢁ2 cm2
Vꢁ1 sꢁ1 to 5.7 ꢀ 10ꢁ3 cm2 Vꢁ1 sꢁ1. The mobility values for the NDI
ester and amide derivatives without terminal alkyl substitution
were one order higher in magnitude compared to their terminal
alkyl substituted counterparts. This was expected, since the alkyl
chains formed an insulating barrier for efficient charge transport
in the NDI-E3 and NDI-A3 derivatives although they also
facilitated formation of cofacially p stacked columns by inter-
digitation. The comparison of mobility values of the ester versus
amides revealed some interesting observations. Contrary to
expectations, the hydrogen bonding in the amide derivatives did
not facilitate better electron mobility. The ester derivatives
exhibited better device performance compared to the amides.
Analyzing the packing in these molecules based on DFT energy
minimized structures and power XRD data, especially in the case
of NDI-E and NDI-A, the NDI amide derivative showed a dihe-
dral twist of the terminal phenyl unit with respect to the naphthyl
aromatic core with a consequent shortening of the molecular
length packing along the a axis. This small difference in the
dihedral twist angle reduced the crystallinity and resulted in
a more tilted orientation of the NDI-A molecules on the substrate
surface. On the whole, the present studies with NDI derivatives
thus demonstrated that the restrictive directional hydrogen
bonding interaction is not so favorable for efficient charge
transport compared to the freedom in charge transport pathways
offered by a three dimensional crystalline organization.
€
A. M. Ramil, H. Sitter, M. Colle and D. M. De Leeuw, Appl. Phys.
Lett., 2006, 89, 213504.
10 T. Vehoff, B. Baumeier, A. Troisi and D. Andrienko, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2010, 132, 11702.
11 R. P. Ortiz, H. Herrera, R. Blanco, H. Huang, A. Facchetti,
T. J. Marks, Y. Zheng and J. L. Segura, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010,
132, 8440.
12 B. A. Jones, A. Facchetti, M. R. Wasielewski and T. J. Marks, Adv.
Funct. Mater., 2008, 18, 1329.
13 D. Braga and G. Horowitz, Adv. Mater., 2009, 221, 1473.
14 T. Sakanoue and H. Sirringhaus, Nat. Mater., 2010, 9, 736.
15 M. Mas-Torrent and C. Rovira, Chem. Rev., 2011, 111, 4833.
16 M. L. Tang and Z. Bao, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 446.
17 E. Ahmed, G. Ren, F. S. Kim, E. C. Hollenbeck and S. A. Jenekhe,
Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 4563.
18 H. E. Katz, A. J. Lovinger, J. Johnson, C. Kloc, T. Siegrist, W. Li,
Y.-Y. Lin and A. Dodabalapur, Nature, 2000, 404, 478.
19 H. Z. Chen, M. M. Ling, X. Mo, M. M. Shi, M. Wang and Z. Bao,
Chem. Mater., 2007, 19, 816.
20 L. Tan, Y. Guo, G. Zhang, Y. Yang, D. Zhang, G. Yu, W. Xu and
Y. Liu, J. Mater. Chem., 2011, 21, 18042.
21 M. M. Durban, P. D. Kazarinoff and C. K. Luscombe,
Macromolecules, 2010, 43, 6348.
22 M. M. Durban, P. D. Kazarinoff, Y. Segawa and C. K. Luscombe,
Macromolecules, 2011, 44, 4721.
23 P. Gawrys, D. Boudinet, A. Kornet, D. Djurado, S. Pouget, V. Jean-
Marie, M. Zagorska and A. Pron, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 1913.
24 P. Gawrys, D. Djurado, J. Rimarcik, A. Kornet, D. Boudinet,
V. Jean-Marie, V. Lukes, I. Wielgus, M. Zagorska and A. Pron, J.
Phys. Chem. B, 2010, 114, 1803.
25 P. Deng, Y. Yan, S.-D. Wang and Q. Zhang, Chem. Commun., 2012,
48, 2591.
26 R. T. Weitz, K. Amsharov, U. Zschieschang, E. B. Villas,
D. K. Goswami, M. Burghard, H. Dosch, M. Jansen, K. Kern and
H. Klauk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2008, 130, 4637.
27 X. Zhan, Z. Tan, B. Domercq, A. Zesheng, X. Zhang, S. Barlow,
Y. Li, D. Zhu, B. Kippelen and S. R. Marder, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2007, 129, 7246.
28 Y. Hu, X. Gao, C.-A. Di, X. Yang, F. Zang, Y. Liu, H. Li and
D. Zhu, Chem. Mater., 2011, 23, 1204.
29 D. Shukla, S. F. Nelson, D. C. Freeman, M. Rajeswaran,
W. G. Ahearn, D. M. Meyer and J. T. Carey, Chem. Mater., 2008,
20, 7486.
30 C.-C. Chu, R. Guillaume, D. Ray, A. D. Guerzo, B. Kauffmann,
G. Wantz, L. Hirsch and D. M. Bassani, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010,
132, 12717.
31 D. Yokoyama, S. Hishahiro, Y. Furukawa, C. Adachi and J. Kido,
Adv. Funct. Mater., 2011, 21, 1375.
32 H. E. Katz, J. Otsuki, K. Yamazaki, A. Suka, T. Takido,
A. J. Lovinger and K. Raghavachari, Chem. Lett., 2003, 508.
Acknowledgements
NBK and SPS thank CSIR for SRF fellowship. We thank the
DST project GAP 277826 and network project NWP0054 for
financial support. The authors thank Mr Pandiaraj S. and Pooja
NCL-Pune, for TEM and AFM measurements, respectively.
Manoj Mane’s help with the DFT calculations is also
acknowledged.
€
€
€
33 M. Gsanger, J. H. Oh, M. Konemann, H. W. Hoffken, A.-M. Krause,
€
Z. Bao and F. Wurthner, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2010, 49, 740.
34 T. Seki, Y. Maruya, K. Nakayama, T. Karatsu, A. Kitamura and
S. Yagai, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 12447.
35 Y. Miyake, P. Hu, K.-Q. Zhao, H. Monobe, A. Fujii, M. Ozaki and
Y. Shimizu, Mol. Cryst. Liq. Cryst., 2010, 525, 97.
36 M.-X. Zhang and G.-J. Zhao, ChemSusChem, 2012, 5, 879.
This journal is ª The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 15235–15246 | 15245