(see Fig. S6 and S7, ESIw). The luminescence switching of
polyEu in methanol solutions was carried out by the stepwise
addition of 600 equiv. of HCl aq. and Et3N, respectively. This
luminescence switching was shown even when organic acids
such as trifluoroacetic acid were used. In addition, the memory
effect of polyEu was examined (see Fig. S8, ESIw). Separate
polyEu films exposed to HCl and Et3N vapor were kept in
a polyethylene bag at room temperature. The polyEu film
exposed to Et3N vapor showed stable red emission after at
least 100 hours. In contrast, the polyEu film exposed to HCl
gas showed the resumption of red luminescence after 48 hours,
suggesting that the HCl-protonated form had disappeared
from the polyEu film. In terms of the response time, we
examined the polyEu film upon exposure to HCl gas and
Et3N vapor, but the response time could not be observed
using our instruments because the spectral changes were too
rapid. This also suggests that the luminescence switching took
place without ligand exchange.
In summary, we have described the vapoluminescent switching
of a novel metallo-supramolecular polymer upon exposure to
acid–base vapor. The polymer was prepared by the coordina-
tion polymerization of europium ion and bis(dicarboxylic
acid-containing terpyridine), and demonstrated fast, stable,
reversible and sensitive switching behavior upon exposure to
acid–base vapor. This luminescence switching system does not
undergo depolymerization and provides access to display
materials with a quick response and good reversibility. There-
fore, our strategy represents a new development in the field of
supramolecular polymer chemistry associated with display and
sensor materials. Further investigations into these materials
and other candidates are ongoing.
Notes and references
1 (a) M. Kato, A. Omura, A. Toshikawa, S. Kishi and Y. Sugimoto,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 3183; (b) S. R. Forrest, Nature,
2004, 428, 911; (c) K. Szacilowski, Chem. Rev., 2008, 108, 3481;
(d) Y. Sagara and T. Kato, Nat. Chem., 2009, 1, 605; (e) G. Zhang,
J. Lu, M. Sabat and C. L. Fraser, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010, 132, 2160.
2 (a) J. Wang, S. Chan, R. R. Carlson, Y. Luo, G. Ge, R. S. Ries,
J. R. Heath and H.-R. Tseng, Nano Lett., 2004, 4, 1693;
(b) Y. S. Zhao, J. Wu and J. Huang, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009,
131, 3158; (c) C. Dou, L. Han, S. Zhao, H. Zhang and Y. Wang,
J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 2011, 2, 666.
To confirm the reversible photoluminescence switching for
polyEu upon exposure to acid–base, the UV-vis spectrum of a
polyEu film was monitored after exposure to HCl gas. The
spectrum afforded a new transition with a shoulder peak at
around 500 nm, indicating that the structure of polyEu might
have changed upon protonation (see Fig. S9, ESIw). However,
the characteristic band at 500 nm completely disappeared after
the exposure to Et3N vapor. Thus, red luminescence was
quenched by protonation by the HCl gas. This behavior was
also observed for polyEu in methanol (see Fig. S10, ESIw).
Upon the addition of HCl, the lowest absorption peak of
polyEu at around 420 nm, assignable to the n - p and p - p*
transitions of the ligand, also showed a significant hyperchromic
shift due to the protonation of polyEu. Upon addition of Et3N to
the acidified solution, the same spectroscopic signatures under-
went a reversal to obtain the initial state. In contrast, the ligand
solution showed the lowest absorption peak at 390 nm after the
addition of HCl, which indicates protonation of the pyridine ring
by HCl (see Fig. S11, ESIw). Furthermore, as shown in Fig. S5
and S6 (ESIw), the PL intensity of a polyEu film and solution after
the exposure of Et3N vapor was recovered to the original. These
results suggest that the depolymerization of polyEu does not occur
upon addition of HCl and the luminescence switching is driven by
the protonation of polyEu.
3 (a) J. D. Badjic, V. Balzani, A. Credi, S. Silvi and J. F. Stoddart,
Science, 2004, 303, 1845; (b) E. R. Kay, D. A. Leigh and F. Zerbetto,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 72; (c) S. M. Landge and
I. Aprahamian, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 18269.
4 (a) F. Nastasi, F. Puntoriero, N. Palmeri, S. Cavallaro, S. Campagna
and S. Lanza, Chem. Commun., 2007, 4740; (b) K. Li, Y. Chen,
W. Lu, N. Zhu and C.-M. Che, Chem.–Eur. J., 2011, 17, 4109.
5 (a) S.-C. Yu, C.-C. Kwok, W.-K. Chan and C.-M. Che, Adv.
Mater., 2003, 15, 1643; (b) C.-C. Kwok, S.-C. Yu, I. H. T. Sham
and C.-M. Che, Chem. Commun., 2004, 2758; (c) M. Higuchi,
Polym. J., 2010, 42, 336; (d) G. R. Whittell, M. D. Hager,
U. S. Schubert and I. Manners, Nat. Mater., 2010, 10, 176;
(e) R. J. Wojtecki, M. A. Meador and S. J. Rowan, Nat. Mater.,
2010, 10, 14; (f) A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Sahu and M. Higuchi,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 1168; (g) M. Burnworth1, L. Tang1,
J. R. Kumpfer1, A. J. Duncan, F. L. Beyer, G. L. Fiore,
S. J. Rowan and C. Weder, Nature, 2011, 472, 334.
6 (a) J. L. Bender, P. S. Corbin, C. L. Fraser, D. H. Metcalf,
F. S. Richardson, E. L. Thomas and A. M. Urbas, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2002, 124, 8526; (b) J. B. Beck and S. J. Rowan, J. Am. Chem.
Soc., 2003, 125, 13922; (c) D. Knapton, P. K. Iyer, S. J. Rowan and
C. Weder, Macromolecules, 2006, 39, 4069; (d) J. R. Kumpfer,
J. Jin and S. J. Rowan, J. Mater. Chem., 2010, 20, 145.
7 (a) K. Binnemans, Chem. Rev., 2009, 109, 4283; (b) J.-C. G. Bunzli,
Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 2729.
¨
A photoluminescent display based on the acid–base vapor
sensitive polyEu was fabricated by the following method (see
Fig. S12(a), ESIw). The image as indicated in Fig. S12(b) (ESIw)
was printed onto a glass substrate using a methanol solution
of polyEu by a stamp and dried in vacuo. As shown in
Fig. S12(b) (ESIw), luminescent red emission was obtained
under irradiation by a UV lamp (lex = 365 nm). Furthermore,
the image maintained its luminescence for at least 4 weeks without
any degradation. After exposure to HCl gas for 5 seconds, the
image disappeared completely. After exposure to a Et3N-enriched
environment for 5 seconds, the image reappeared.
8 D. Knapton, M. Burnworth, S. J. Rowan and C. Weder, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 5825.
9 J.-C. G. Bunzli and C. Piguet, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2005, 34, 1048.
¨
10 M. Giraud, E. S. Andreiadis, A. S. Fisyuk, R. Demadrille, J. Pe
D. Imbert and M. Mazzanti, Inorg. Chem., 2008, 47, 3952.
´
caut,
11 (a) M. Chiper, M. A. R. Meier, J. M. Johannes and U. S. Schubert,
Macromol. Chem. Phys., 2007, 208, 679; (b) R. P. Pal, M. Higuchi
and D. G. Kurth, Org. Lett., 2009, 11, 3562; (c) J. Li, Z. Futera,
H. Li, Y. Tateyama and M. Higuchi, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.,
2011, 13, 4839.
12 (a) R. Shunmugam and G. N. Tew, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005,
127, 13567; (b) E. S. Andreiadis, R. Demadrille, D. Imbert,
´
J. Pecaut and M. Mazzanti, Chem.–Eur. J., 2009, 15, 9458.
c
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 4947–4949 4949