phosphines have been designed and prepared for this pur-
pose, and some of them demonstrated a broad substrate scope
and good functional group tolerance.3a,6 Furthermore, N-
heterocyclic carbenes (NHCs) represent a class of environ-
mentally friendly ligands and have exhibited promising po-
tential in these transformations.5a,7 In general, the steric and
electronic properties of ligands play a crucial role in enhanc-
ing the coupling efficiency. Influenced by the “flexible steric
bulky” concept proposed by Glorius and co-workers,8 cur-
rently, a number of research groups have focused on increas-
ing catalytic activity by using the bulkier NHC ligands. For
example, among NHC palladium complexes 2 developed by
Organ and co-workers, the i-Pent carbene complex exhibited
higher activity than its i-Pr analogues.7c,9 However, much less
attention has been given to the variation of the electronic
properties of NHC ligands to accelerate the coupling process.
Furthermore, the existing protocols are still hampered: (1) a
high catalyst loading (usually 2ꢀ10 mol %) is required to
achieve a reasonable conversion; (2) some ligand syntheses
are often time-consuming; (3) the general catalyst, which has
the ability to satisfy the diverse requirements of the coupling
reactions with various substrates, is still under investigation.
During our recent research on the synthesis of metal
complexes and their potential applications in catalysis and
soft matter aspects,10,11 we found that ylidenes derived from
benzimidazolium or other π-extended imidazolium salts
show better catalytic activity than their imidazolium ana-
logues, which may arise from their stronger σ-donor and
weaker π-acceptor properties. Therefore, a novel robust
palladium NHC complex 3a was recently synthesized from
commercially available starting materials by our group
and revealed high catalytic activity in the amination of
(hetero)aryl chlorides.11a Herein, we now extend this study
and explore the catalytic potential of this new type of catalysts
3aꢀc toward sterically hindered biaryl coupling reactions.
To evaluate the efficiency of Pd-NHC complexes 3aꢀc
in highly sterically congested aryl formation reactions,
2-methoxynapthalene bromide and 2,6-dimethylphenyl
boronic acid were selected as substrates to optimize the
reaction conditions (Table 1). To our delight, with only
0.5 mol % of 3a, the tetra-ortho-substituted biaryl 4a was
formed almost in a quantitative yield when the reaction
was carried with t-BuOK and dioxane at 80 °C within 24 h
(Table 1, entry 1). However, when less bulky catalysts 3b
and 3c were applied, very unsatisfying results were ob-
served (Table 1, entries 2 and 3). In general, 4 A molecular
sieves (M.S.) are required in the coupling reactions in order
to avoid phenol formation.12 However, there is no differ-
ence the yields with or without 4 A M.S. even when
t-BuOK and t-BuOH were applied with 3a. Further in-
creasing the catalyst loading to 1 mol % resulted in a
similar isolated yield (96% vs 97%, Table 1, entries 4ꢀ5).
When toluene was utilized, the coupling process still works
well and a 95% yield was obtained(Table 1, entry 6). When
other organic solvents were screened, however, no desired
product could be detected (see the Supporting Information).
In addition, only a 70% isolated yield was observed when
t-BuONa was applied instead of its potassium analogue.
Therefore, other potassium bases were selected for further
optimization. The strong base KOH afforded a moderate
yield, whereas weak bases such as K2CO3 and K3PO4 even
suppressed the transformation (Table 1, entries 8, 9, and 11).
By varying bases to Cs2CO3 or CsF, or using xylene instead of
dioxane, 75%, 55%, and 42% yields were observed (Table 1,
entries 10, 12, and 13), respectively. Additionally, no reac-
tions occurred when selected organic bases were tested (see
the Supporting Information). In contrast to the blank test,
upon decreasing the catalyst loading to 0.1 or 0.05 mol %,
94% and 77% yields were still obtained (Table 1, entries
14ꢀ16), which further confirmed the catalyst efficiency.
As illustrated in Scheme 1, PdꢀNHC complex 3a ex-
hibits high catalytic activity to form sterically hindered
di-, tri-, and tetra-ortho-substituted biaryls. Even with a
0.5 mol % catalyst loading, the protocol well tolerated a
number of substituted arylboronic acids to form tetra-
ortho-substituted biaryl products in good to quantitative
yields (4ꢀ6). The electronic properties of the ortho-sub-
stituted groups affected the coupling process slightly more
strongly than the additional substituted groups in the
para-position of arylboronic acids (4b and 6aꢀb vs 5aꢀc);
in the later case all substrates result in similar excellent
yields (5aꢀc, 98ꢀ>99%). When Cs2CO3 and t-BuOH
(6) Selected recent publications: (a) To, S. C.; Kwong, F. Y. Chem.
Commun. 2011, 5079. (b) Tang, W.; Capacci, A. G.; Wei, X.; Li, W.;
White, A.; Patel, N. D.; Savoie, J.; Gao, J. J.; Rodriguez, S.; Qu, B.;
Haddad, N.; Lu, B. Z.; Krishnamurthy, D.; Yee, N. K.; Senanayake,
C. H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 5879. (c) Bolliger, J. L.; Frech,
C. M. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 4075. (d) So, C. M.; Chow, W. K.; Choy,
P. Y.; Lau, C. P.; Kwong, F. Y. Chem.;Eur. J. 2010, 16, 7996.
(e) Ackermann, L.; Potukuchi, H. K.; Althammer, A.; Born, R.; Mayer,
P. Org. Lett. 2010, 12, 1004. (f) Hoshi, T.; Nakazawa, T.; Saitoh, I.;
Mori, A.; Suzuki, T.; Sakai, J; Hagiwara, H. Org. Lett. 2008, 10, 2063.
(7) Selected recent publications: (a) Wu, L.; Drinkel, E.; Gaggia, F.;
Capolicchio, S.; Linden, A.; Falivene, L.; Cavallo, L.; Dorta, R.
Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 12886. (b) Schmidt, A.; Rahimi, A. Chem.
Commun. 2010, 2995. (c) Organ, M. G.; C-alimsiz, S.; Sayah, M.; Hoi,
K. H.; Lough, A. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 2383. (d) Luan, X.;
Mariz, R.; Gatti, M.; Costabile, C.; Poater, A.; Cavallo, L.; Linden, A.;
ꢀ
´
z-Gonzalez, S.;
Dorta, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 6848. (e) Dı
Marion, N.; Nolan, S. P. Chem. Rev. 2009, 109, 3612.
(8) Altenhoff, G.; Goddard, R.; Lehmann, C. W.; Glorius, F. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 15195.
(9) (a) Sayah, M.; Organ, M. G. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 11719.
(b) Hoi, K. H.; C-alimsiz, S.; Froese, R. D. J.; Hopkinson, A. C; Organ,
M. G. Chem.;Eur. J. 2011, 17, 3086. (c) C-alimsiz, S.; Organ, M. G.
Chem. Commun. 2011, 5181. (d) Nasielski, J.; Hadei, N.; Achonduh, G.;
Kantchev, E. A.; O’Brien, B. C. J.; Lough, A.; Organ, M. G. Chem.;
Eur. J. 2010, 16, 10844.
€
(10) (a) Tu, T.; Fang, W.; Bao, X.; Li, X.; Dotz, K. H. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2011, 50, 6601. (b) Tu, T.; Bao, X.; Assenmacher, W.; Peterlik, H.;
€
Daniels, J.; Dotz, K. H. Chem.;Eur. J. 2009, 15, 1853. (c) Tu, T.;
€
Assenmacher, W.; Peterlik, H.; Schnakenburg, G.; Dotz, K. H. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 7127. (d) Tu, T.; Assenmacher, W.; Peterlik, H.;
Weisbarth, R.; Nieger, M.; Dotz,K.H.Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 6368.
(12) Anderson, K. W.; Ikawa, T.; Tundel, R. E.; Buchwald, S. L.
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 10694.
€
(11) (a) Tu, T.; Fang, W.; Jian, J. Chem. Commun. 2011, 12358. (b)
Wang, Z.; Feng, X.; Fang, W.; Tu, T. Synlett 2011, 951. (c) Tu, T.; Feng,
X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, X. Dalton Trans. 2010, 10598. (d) Tu, T.; Mao, H.;
(13) Bellina, F.; Carpita, A.; Rossi, R. Synthesis 2004, 2419.
(14) (a) Baudoin, O.; Gueritte, F. In Studies in Natural Product
Chemistry; Rahman, A.-U., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2003; Vol. 29, pp
€
Herbert, C.; Xu, M.; Dotz, K. H. Chem. Commun. 2010, 7796. (e) Tu, T.;
€
€
Malineni, J.; Bao, X.; Dotz, K. H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2009, 351, 1029.
355ꢀ418; (b) Nicolaou, K. C.; Boddy, C. N. C.; Brase, S.; Winssinger, N.
€
(f) Tu, T.; Malineni, J.; Dotz, K. H. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 1791.
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1999, 38, 2096.
Org. Lett., Vol. 14, No. 16, 2012
4251