Z. Shariatinia et al. / Journal of Molecular Structure 1023 (2012) 18–24
23
using Gaussian 98 software at HF and B3LYP method with
6-31+G⁄⁄ standard basis set. Fig.
indicates the optimized
respectively. Similar results were obtained for the nitrogen atoms
of other structures here presented.
1
structures of the compounds 1–4. In the optimized structures of
compounds 1 and 2, the 4-Me and 4-Ph substituents place in pseu-
do-axial positions, but the 4-C(O)OEt moieties in 3 are in pseudo-
equatorial positions (likely due to the planar carbon atom of C@O
group). Also, the CH2 groups in compound 4 connected to aliphatic
five-membered rings are in pseudo-equatorial positions (Fig. 1).
Quantum chemical calculations also show that among seven
plausible forms of compound 6, compound 6C-2 is the most stable
and between compounds 7 and 7A, compound 7 is more stable
than 7A. The 4-fluorobenzoyl moieties in 7 and 7A indicate cis
and trans conformations relative to the P@O groups with
O@Pꢄ ꢄ ꢄFAC torsion angles equal to 176.26° and 147.84°,
respectively.
The selected calculated NQCCs (v
s) for the quadrupole 14N, 2H
and 17O nuclei of compounds 1–4 at HF and B3LYP methods with
The selected calculated NQCC (v
) for the quadrupole 14N, 2H
6-31+G⁄⁄ basis set are represented in Table S3 and Scheme 2. The
and 17O nuclei of compounds 5–7 at HF/6-311++G⁄⁄ are repre-
v
values for the oxygen and nitrogen atoms are about 5.0 MHz,
sented in Scheme 2 and Table S4 (Supplementary material). The
while for the 2H atoms of CH and NH groups they are near 200
and 300 kHz, respectively.
oxygen atoms of P@O and C@O bonds have
v
values about 5.0
values
and 10.0 MHz, respectively. The reason for the almost half
v
of oxygen atoms in phosphoryl moieties with respect to carbonyl
groups could be the more negative carbonyl oxygen atoms owing
to the resonance interactions. For the amidic and endocyclic amino
4.2.2. Compounds 5–7
The structural properties of phosphoric triamides (5–7) that are
similar to compounds (1–4) have also been optimized at HF/6-
31G⁄ and HF/6-311++G⁄⁄ levels of theory. In the Scheme 2, a draw-
ing of the studied compounds is given and Figs. 2–4 show the opti-
mized structures. The species 5–7 have been previously
synthesized and the geometries of N-4-fluorobenzoyl phosphoric
triamides including their conformers and disorders structures
were studied by X-ray diffraction [11]. The aliphatic five- and se-
ven-membered rings in compounds 5, 7 and 7A have puckered
shapes while the six-membered rings of seven forms of 6 show
chair conformation. For compounds 5–7, the P@O bond presents
an anti conformation with respect to the C@O double bonds. The
pseudo-torsion angles O@Pꢄ ꢄ ꢄC@O in compounds 5, 6C-2 and 7
are 170.46°, 172.79° and 166.17°, respectively. This result confirms
the earlier X-ray structures reported elsewhere [11]. In these mol-
ecules, the bond angles around the P atom indicate a distorted con-
formation varying from 103.95° to 119.67° in 5 at HF/6-31G⁄
method. Similar results were observed for other compounds at
both HF/6-31G⁄ and HF/6-311++G⁄⁄ levels of theory.
nitrogen atoms, the
respectively, and for the H atoms they were near 300 kHz. The
smaller values for the amidic N atoms may be due to the electron
v values compute about 4.0 and 5.5 MHz,
v
withdrawing of 4-fluorobenzoyl moiety that leads to deshielding of
amidic N compared with amino N atom.
Acknowledgements
The financial support of this work by the Research Councils of
Amirkabir University of Technology and Tarbiat Modares Univer-
sity is gratefully acknowledged. CODV and MFE are indebted to
the Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica (AN-
PCyT), Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
(CONICET), and the Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas de la
Provincia de Buenos Aires (CIC), República Argentina, for financial
support. He also thanks the Facultad de Ciencias Exactas, Univers-
idad Nacional de La Plata, República Argentina for financial
support.
The computed bond lengths, angles and torsion angles at HF/6-
31G⁄ and HF/6-311++G⁄⁄ are compared with their related data ob-
tained from the X-ray crystal structures of these molecules [11]
that are in good agreement with each other, however it is seen that
HF/6-31G⁄ has a better correspondence with the experimental val-
ues than HF/6-311++G⁄⁄. In compounds 5–7, the PAN(amide)
bonds are longer than the PAN(amine) bonds, because of the reso-
Appendix A. Supplementary material
The molecular formula of compounds 1–7 with atom number-
ing are shown in Scheme S1. The computed bond lengths, angles
and torsion angles of compounds 1–4 (at B3LYP/6-31+G⁄⁄ level)
and 5–7 (at HF/6-311++G⁄⁄ level) are presented in Tables S1 and
S2, respectively. Selected calculated NQCCs (vs) for compounds
nance interaction of the N(amide) with the C@O
p system. In fact,
1–4 and 5–7 are given in Tables S3 and S4, respectively. Supple-
mentary data associated with this article can be found, in the on-
all PAN bonds in compounds 1–7 are shorter than the typical PAN
single bond (1.77 Å [29]) whereas the P@O bond lengths are larger
than the reported P@O bond length (1.45 Å) [29]. In molecules 1–7,
the nitrogen environment is practically planar. For example, in
compound 5 the angles P(1)AN(3)AC(7), P(1)AN(3)AH(4) and
C(7)AN(3)AH(4) are 130.00°, 111.07° and 118.09°, respectively
with average 119.72°. The sum of surrounding angles around
N(3), N(5) and N(6) atoms are 359.16°, 358.34° and 352.18°,
References
[1] K. Gholivand, H. Mostaanzadeh, T. Koval, M. Dusek, M.F. Erben, H. Stoeckli-
Evans, C.O. Della Védova, Acta Crystallogr. B 66 (2010) 441.
[2] K. Gholivand, H.R. Mahzouni, M.D. Esrafili, Dalton Trans. 41 (2012) 1597.
[3] T. Chivers, M. Krahn, G. Schatte, M. Parvez, Inorg. Chem. 42 (2003) 3994.
[4] T.K. Olszewski, C. Bomont, P. Coutrot, C. Grison, J. Organomet. Chem. 695
(2010) 2354.
[5] K. Gholivand, H. Mostaanzadeh, T. Koval, M. Dusek, M.F. Erben, H. Stoeckli-
Evans, C.O. Della Védova, Acta Crystallogr. B 65 (2009) 502.
[6] M. Pourayoubi, A. Tarahhomi, A. Saneei, A.L. Rheingold, J.A. Golen, Acta
Crystallogr. C 67 (2011) o265.
[7] K. Gholivand, H.R. Mahzouni, Acta Crystallogr. B 67 (2011) 238.
[8] K. Gholivand, H. Mostaanzadeh, Z. Shariatinia, N. Oroujzadeh, Main Group
Chem. 5 (2006) 95.
[9] K. Gholivand, M. Pourayoubi, Z. Shariatinia, Polyhedron 26 (2007) 837.
[10] K. Gholivand, Z. Shariatinia, M. Pourayoubi, Z. Anorg, Allg. Chem. 632 (2006)
160.
[11] K. Gholivand, Z. Shariatinia, M. Pourayoubi, Polyhedron 25 (2006) 711.
[12] K. Gholivand, Z. Hosseini, M. Pourayoubi, Z. Shariatinia, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem.
631 (2005) 3074.
[13] K. Gholivand, M. Pourayoubi, Z. Anorg, Allg. Chem. 630 (2004) 1330.
[14] K. Gholivand, C.O. Della Védova, A. Anaraki Firooz, A. Madani Alizadegan, M.C.
Michelini, R. Pis Diez, J. Mol. Struct. 750 (2005) 64.
Fig. 4. Optimized structures obtained for compounds 7 and 7A at HF/6-311++G⁄⁄
level of theory.