Page 3 of 4
ChemComm
Scheme 3 Energy profile of the reaction
This was confirmed thanks to the computation of the transition
relative energies of complexes with formal oxidation states
between 0 and 4. Pt(0), Pt(II) and even Pt(IV) species may be in
equilibrium under readily accessible thermal conditions. Work is
currently underway to further develop this coupling process
50 between unactivated aromatic derivatives.
state energy of the dissociation of 4H through Eyring’s method19:
we obtained, using the data of the previous kinetic study, a
transition state energy of 22.2 kcal/mol, which fits well to the
computed TSBC (See ESI for calculation details).
5
The calculations show that the hypothetical free 14 electron
fragment A is higher in energy than both the solvent adduct B and
Notes and references
10 the C–H inserted complex C. The reversibility of the insertion is
readily explained by the energy of TSBC which lies only 20.9
kcal/mol higher than C, indicating a facile process at room
temperature, and confirming our working hypothesis. Several
possibilities for the formation of the coupling products were
15 searched, involving either the intermediacy of Pt(IV) centers or
via metathesis reactions for which only Pt(II) centers are
involved. The process involving Pt(IV) was the lowest in energy.
Thus Pt(IV) dihydride complex D was calculated only at 12.5
kcal/mol (25.5 kcal/mol in G) higher than C. The TSCD was
20 found at 28.0 kcal/mol above C. The formation of the “Pt(H)2Pt”
complex was not searched because of the size of the system.
Rather, a path leading to a monomeric “Pt(H)2” complex, E,
which could then react with the Pt(0) complex B to form the
observed dimer was searched from complex D. The reductive
25 elimination from complex D does in fact lead to the formation of
complex E, but the transition state connecting these two
complexes, TSDE, was calculated at 41.0 kcal/mol. On the other
hand, the TSDF leading to the elimination of H2 and the formation
of complex F was found at 30.0 kcal/mol, indicating a favored
30 path. Reductive elimination leading to fragment A was found to
require 33.1 kcal/mol from F (TSFA at 37.2 kcal/mol). Finally, the
oxidative addition of H2 to lead to complex E was found
barrierless. Overall, the calculations are in accord with the
experimental facts, namely showing that inserted complex C is
35 the preferred kinetic species of the reduction, and that an overall
high activation energy of 37.2 kcal/mol is required to eventually
form the thermodynamic complex, the Pt(I) dimer via complex E.
In conclusion, we show here that using a strongly donating and
flexible diphosphine ligand, featuring a propyl bridge between
40 the P atoms, a reactive Pt(0) fragment can be generated, which
does insert C–H bonds reversibly at room temperature. It was
also showed, and corroborated by DFT calculations, that the
Pt(II) complex can then further react with the solvent to yield
biaryl derivatives at relatively low temperatures. The nature of
45 the bidentate ligand therefore influences to a great extent the
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry [year]
a Laboratoire « Hétéroéléments et Coordination », UMR CNRS 7653,
Ecole Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau CEDEX, France,Tel: +33 1 69 33
44 02; Mail: nicolas.mezailles@polytechnique.edu
55 b Laboratoire « Mécanismes Réactionnels », UMR CNRS 7651, Ecole
Polytechnique, 91128 Palaiseau CEDEX, France
† Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Full
experimental procedures, characterizations of products, CIF files for
crystal structures, details of kinetic studies and geometry of optimized
60 structures are contained in the electronic supplementary information. See
DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
1. N. F. Goldshle, M. B. Tyabin, A. E. Shilov, and A. A. Shteinma,
Russ. J. Phys. Chem. USSR, 1969, 43, 1222.
2. A. E. Shilov and G. B. Shul’pin, Chem. Rev., 1997, 97, 2879-2932.
65 3. R. A. Periana, Science, 1998, 280, 560-564.
4. R. A. Periana, O. Mironov, D. Taube, G. Bhalla, and C. J. Jones,
Science, 2003, 301, 814-8.
5. J. C. Thomas and J. C. Peters, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 8870-
88.
70 6. M. Lersch and M. Tilset, Chem. Rev., 2005, 105, 2471-526.
7. M. P. Jensen, D. D. Wick, S. Reinartz, P. S. White, J. L. Templeton,
and K. I. Goldberg, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2003, 125, 8614-24.
8. L. Johansson, M. Tilset, J. A. Labinger, and J. E. Bercaw, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2000, 122, 10846-10855.
75 9. T. M. Miller and G. M. Whitesides, Organometallics, 1986, 5, 1473-
1480.
10. S. S. Stahl, J. A. Labinger, and J. E. Bercaw, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
1996, 118, 5961-5976.
11. G. M. Whitesides, Pure Appl. Chem., 1981, 53, 287-292.
80 12. D. Balcells, E. Clot, and O. Eisenstein, Chem. Rev., 2010, 110, 749-
823.
13. L. Abis, A. Sen, and J. Halpern, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1978, 100, 2915-
2916.
14. M. Hackett, J. A. Ibers, and G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
85
90
1988, 110, 1436-1448.
15. M. Hackett and G. M. Whitesides, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1988, 110,
1449-1462.
16. W. D. Jones, Acc. Chem. Res., 2003, 36, 140-6.
17. N. Carr, L. Mole, A. G. Orpen, and J. L. Spencer, J. Chem. Soc.
Dalton Trans., 1992, 2653.
18. For the full references for Gaussian09, functionals and basis sets, see
the supplementary information.
19. W. F. K. Wynne-Jones and H. Eyring, J. Chem. Phys., 1935, 3, 492.
[journal], [year], [vol], 00–00 | 3