S. Liu et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 3838–3841
3839
Table 2
O
S
N
O
S
N
FeCl3⋅6H2O
Reaction of 1a with various aryl ketonesa
FeCl3⋅6H2O
R1
R2
R1
+
C
Ar
O2
Ar
S
N
O
O
S
S
N
P(Cy)3HBF4
+
+
Ar
Ar
R1
Scheme 1. General reaction.
DMSO, H2O
120 °C, O2
N
Ar
1a
2
3
4
yield to 91%, together with 8% of byproduct 4a (entry 14). Solvent
also played an important role in this transformation, the reactions
in other solvents all decreased the reaction yields significantly, and
no desired product was formed in the absence of DMSO (entries
15–19). Much lower yield was obtained when the reaction was car-
ried out under an atmosphere of air (entry 20). The reaction tem-
perature is another important factor for the yield of the product.
Increasing the reaction temperature increased the yield of the
byproduct and decreased the desired product yield (entry 21).
Under the optimized reaction conditions, the scope and gener-
ality of the oxidative condensation were explored (Table 2).12
The reactions with aromatic ketones bearing electron-donating
groups at the aromatic ring proceeded smoothly to give the desired
products in good yields (entries 2 and 3). Functional groups such as
fluoro, chloro, trifluoromethyl, and nitro were well tolerated under
the optimized reaction conditions (entries 4–8). The position of
substituents on the phenyl ring of ketones affected the selectivity
significantly, and the use of 2-chloroacetophenone (2f) afforded
3f and 4f in 80% total yield (entry 6). Notably, the coupling of het-
ero aromatic ketone 2-acetylthiophene (2j) with 1a afforded 3j in
65% yield (entry 10). To our delight, besides aromatic ketones,
other aromatic carbonyl compounds such as propiophenone (2k)
and ethyl benzoylacetate (2l) also reacted with 1a to give the de-
sired products in good yields (entries 11 and 12). Unfortunately,
aliphatic ketones are not suitable substrates for this kind of trans-
formation under the optimal reaction conditions.
Entry
Ketone
Product
Yieldb (%)
O
O
S
N
R
R
1
2
3
4
5
6
R = H
R = 4-Me
R = 4-OMe
R = 4-F
R = 4-Cl
R = 2-Cl
2a
2b
2c
2d
2e
2f
3a
3b
3c
3d
75
72
78
81
76
80
3e
3f + 4f
(3:1)
3g
7
8
R = 3-CF3
R = 3-CF3
2g
2h
75
64
3h
O
3i + 4i
(4.3:1)
9
2i
80
O
10
11
12
2j
3j
65
76
81
S
O
3a + 4a
(1.5:1)
2k
2l
Ph
O
O
3a + 4a
(4.4:1)
Ph
OEt
a
Conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol), FeCl3Á6H2O (5 mol %), P(Cy)3HBF4
(5 mol %), DMSO/H2O (0.4 mL, 3:1), 120 °C, 20 h, under oxygen.
b
Isolated yield based on 1a.
Table 1
Optimization of the reaction conditionsa
To further explore the scope of the reaction, various benzothiaz-
oles were employed to react with 2a under the optimized reaction
conditions (Table 3). A series of functional groups including
methyl, methoxy, chloro, bromo, and nitro were well tolerated un-
der the optimal conditions, and the desired products were ob-
tained in moderate to good yields (Table 3, entries 1–7). The
position of the substituents on the phenyl ring of benzothiazoles
affected the reaction yield significantly, and the use of 4-methyl-
benzothiazole (1i) afforded the desired product in 15% yield as de-
tected by GC (entry 8). Under the optimized reaction conditions,
the reaction of 2-aminothiophenol with acetophenone also gave
the desired product 3a in 52% yield which was lower than the reac-
tion yield of benzothiazole with acetophenone (entry 9). Unfortu-
nately, benzoxazoles are not good substrates for this
transformation under the optimized reaction conditions.
O
S
N
S
N
S
O
catalyst
+
+
Ph
120 o
C
Ph
N
Ph
O2
1a
Entry
2a
3a
Solvent
4a
Catalyst
Ligand
Yieldb (%)
3a
4a
1
2
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:2)
H2O/DMSO (1:3)
DMSO
0
0
0
0
0
0
Fe2O3
3
4
Ferrocene
Fe(acac)3
20
42
40
55
75
76
70
77
65
82
91
25
0
5
5
6
Fe2(NO3)3
FeSO4
13
14
16
18
19
14
15
12
12
8
3
0
0
0
0
8
21
7
Fe2(SO4)3
8
9
FeCl2Á4H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
FeCl3Á6H2O
To get more information about the reaction mechanism, several
control experiments were set up under the standard conditions.
We performed a 13C labeling experiment under the optimized con-
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20c
21d
PPh3
dppm
P(Cy)3
ditions with acetophenone-a-
13C. The corresponding adducts 3a
P(Cy)3HBF4
P(Cy)3HBF4
P(Cy)3HBF4
P(Cy)3HBF4
P(Cy)3HBF4
P(Cy)3HBF4
P(Cy)3HBF4
P(Cy)3HBF4
P(Cy)3HBF4
and 4a with 13C were obtained in 84% total yield (Schemes 1 and
2). The reaction of benzothiazole with phenylglyoxal showed much
poor selectivity and gave 4a as the major product (Scheme 2).
Based on these observations and our previous research,9 a possible
reaction mechanism is described as follows using benzothiazole
(1a) and acetophenone (2a) as an example (Scheme 3). Initially,
benzothiazole 1a was converted to 2-aminothiophenol (A) via
ring-opening reaction in the presence of Lewis acid catalyst
FeCl3Á6H2O,13 which is similar to our previous work with aromatic
aldehydes.9a In the meanwhile, acetophenone 2b was oxidized to
phenylglyoxal (B) which is similar to the I2 promoted sp3 C–H
DMF
Toluene
NMP
H2O
H2O/DMSO
H2O/DMSO
0
0
0
35
65
a
Conditions: 1a (0.2 mmol), 2a (0.3 mmol), catalyst (5 mol %), ligand (5 mol %),
solvent (0.4 mL), 120 °C, 20 h, under oxygen.
b
GC yield.
Under air.
140 °C.
c
d