A R T I C L E S
Laube
from the Cambridge Structural Database.63 Semiempirical calculations
were carried out with SYBYL 6.064/MOPAC,65 DFT calculations with
Gaussian 03 W66 with GaussView 3.09.67 Molecular modeling was
carried out with SYBYL 6.064 and ViewerPro.68 ADP, ball-and-stick,
and packing diagrams were produced with Ortep.69,70 Photorealistic
graphics were generated with POV-Ray.71
the benzene-like ring, we conclude that a (3c, 2e) bond
interacting with a butadienyl system is a suitable description of
Me-1+ as suggested by Bartlett et al..2 The experimentally
determined structure shows a higher degree of bridging than
the computed DFT gas-phase structure.
The crystal structure of 5+ is probably disordered with 18
and can thus only cautiously be interpreted. The C skeleton
indicates only a weak interaction between the C9 and the C4a-
C8a bridges. The observed elongation of the C-O bond upon
protonation is 0.048(2) Å or more. DFT calculations of 5+ in
the gas phase are not appropriate for a description in the crystal
because of the high tendency to dissociate into a H-1+/water
complex observed in the calculations. If the polar environment
of 5+ in the crystal is simulated by a DFT calculation in water,
a relatively good description with the exception of the C-O
bond length is achieved. With regard to the C-O bond length,
the ion 5+ seems to be related to H3B-NH3 and other “partially
bonded” molecules.32c The disordered oxonium proton positions
cannot be explained by DFT calculations on isolated ion pairs
in the gas phase, which lead to a practically complete proton
transfer to the anion, i.e., the hydrogen-bonded complex 18‚
ClSO3H. Therefore we assume that the observed equilibrium
between the oxonium ion 5+ and the alcohol 18 in the crystal
occurs due to cooperative hydrogen bonds and cation-anion
interactions in the infinite chains.
Acknowledgment. We thank Dr. Anthony Linden (University
of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland) for carrying out the X-ray
measurements and Mrs. Sandra Weber (Cilag AG) for help with
the syntheses.
Supporting Information Available: Tables S1 and S2,
Experimental Section. Tables and additional graphics of the
crystal structure data, NMR spectra, results of quantum chemical
calculations, data about various structures from the literature
mentioned in the discussion. Two X-ray crystallographic files
in CIF format. This material is available free of charge via the
JA040115T
(62) Laube, T. FOTOPLOT, version 6; Schaffhausen, Switzerland, 2001.
(63) Allen, F. H. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 2002, B58, 380-388. Bruno, I. J.;
Cole, J. C.; Edgington, P. R.; Kessler, M. K.; Macrae, C. F.; McCabe, P.;
Pearson J.; Taylor, R. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B 2002, B58, 389-397.
(64) SYBYL 6.0; Tripos Inc.: St. Louis, MO, 1992.
(65) Stewart, J. J. P. MOPAC, version 5.0 (integrated in SYBYL 6.064); QCPE
#455.
(66) Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M.
A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.;
Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.;
Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.;
Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa,
J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.;
Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo,
J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.;
Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.;
Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels,
A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.;
Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.;
Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz,
P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.;
Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson,
B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03W,
revision B.03; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
Computational Section
The X-ray data reductions were carried out with teXsan,57 the
absorption corrections (based on multiscans from symmetry-
related measurements) were carried out with Sortav.58 The crystal
structures were solved with SHELXS59 and refined with SHELXL.60
Analyses of the refined structures were carried out with PLATON61
and analyses of the reciprocal space data have been displayed also with
FOTOPLOT.62 Experimental reference structures have been retrieved
(57) teXsan 1.10 (Unix version); Molecular Structure Corporation: The
Woodlands, TX.
(58) Blessing, R. H. Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 1995, A51, 33-38.
(59) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXS-97 - CRYSTAL STRUCTURE SOLUTION -
UNIX VERSION, release 97-2; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen,
Germany, 1997.
(60) Sheldrick, G. M. SHELXL-97 - CRYSTAL STRUCTURE REFINEMENT
- UNIX VERSION, release 97-2; University of Go¨ttingen: Go¨ttingen,
Germany, 1997.
(61) Spek, A. L. PLATON: A Multipurpose Crystallographic Tool; Utrecht
University: Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2002. Farrugia, L. J. Platon for
Windows; University of Glasgow: Glasgow, U.K., 2002.
(67) GaussView 3.09; Gaussian, Inc.: Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
(68) DiscoVery Studio ViewerPro; Accelrys Inc.: San Diego, CA, 2002.
(69) Burnett, M. N.; Johnson, C. K. ORTEP-III: Oak Ridge Thermal Ellipsoid
Plot Program for Crystal Structure Illustrations; Oak Ridge National
Laboratory Report ORNL-6895, 1996.
(70) Farrugia, L. J. Ortep-3 for Windows Version 1.07; University of Glasgow:
Glasgow, U.K., 2001.
(71) POV-Team POV-Ray, version 3.1g; c/o Hallam Oaks P/L: P.O. Box 407,
Williamstown, Victoria 3016, Australia, 1999.
9
10912 J. AM. CHEM. SOC. VOL. 126, NO. 35, 2004