724
H. Zhou et al. / Dyes and Pigments 95 (2012) 723e731
2.2.2. Preparation of Dyes 1e4
L (23.9 mg, 0.05 mmol) in 15 mL of CHCl3 was added into
a 50 mL colorimeter tube, layered with 10 mL of ethanol (or
methanol), and then HgX2 (X ¼ Cl, Br, I for SCN) (0.05 mmol) in
15 mL of ethanol (or methanol) was added. The solution was left for
slow evaporation and crystals were collected for each case after two
weeks.
2.2.2.1. HgLCl2 (Dye 1). Yield: 26 mg (69%). FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 3442
(m), 3097 (w),1595 (vs),1572 (m),1521 (vs),1474 (s),1428 (m),1403
(m), 1278 (m), 1248 (m), 1218 (m), 1011 (m), 980 (m), 839 (m), 790
(m), 745 (m). Calcd for C31H22Cl2N6Hg: C, 49.64; H, 2.96; N, 11.20%.
Found: C, 49.81; H, 2.99; N, 11.14%. From the calculated analysis
result, we can infer the unit of Dye 1 may contain one HgLCl2.
Fig. 1. Structure of the ligand (L).
2.2.2.2. [HgLBr2]2$CHCl3 (Dye 2). Yield: 31 mg (74%). FT-IR (KBr,
cmꢀ1): 3441 (m), 3098 (w), 1594 (vs), 1571 (m), 1519 (s), 1473 (s),
1428 (m), 1402 (m), 1278 (w), 1247 (w), 1216 (w), 1009 (m), 979 (m),
838 (m), 788 (m), 742 (m). Calcd for C63H45N12Br4Cl3 Hg2: C, 42.10;
H, 2.52; N, 9.35%. Found: C, 42.31; H, 2.57; N, 9.34%. From the
calculated analysis result, we can infer the unit of Dye 2 may
contain two HgLBr2 and a chloroform molecule.
obtained by self-assembling the ligand with HgX2 (X ¼ Cl, Br, I,
SCN). L and Dye 4 were characterized by single crystal X-ray
diffraction determination. Linear and nonlinear optical properties
of the ligand and four dyes were investigated.
2. Experimental section
2.1. Materials and physical measurements
2.2.2.3. [HgLI2]2$CHCl3 (Dye 3). Yield: 35 mg (75%). FT-IR (KBr,
cmꢀ1): 3442 (m), 3104 (w), 1595 (vs), 1539 (m), 1521 (s), 1474 (s),
1426 (m), 1402 (m), 1278 (m), 1248 (m), 1216 (m), 1009 (m), 978
(m), 837 (m), 788 (m), 733 (m). Calcd for C63H45N12Cl3I4Hg2: C,
38.11; H, 2.28; N, 8.47%. Found: C, 38.29; H, 2.33; N, 8.42%. From the
calculated analysis result, we can infer the unit of Dye 3 may
contain two HgLI2 and a chloroform molecule.
UVevis absorption spectra were recorded on a UV-3100 spec-
trophotometer. Fluorescence measurements were carried out using
an Edinburgh FLS920 fluorescence spectrometer equipped with
a 450 W Xe lamp and a time-correlated single-photon counting
(TCSPC) card. All the fluorescence spectra were collected. The
single-photon excited fluorescence (SPEF) quantum yields (F) were
2.2.2.4. HgL(SCN)2 (Dye 4). Yield: 26 mg (65%). FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ1):
3429 (m), 3106 (w), 2922(w), 2112 (s), 1594 (vs), 1572 (m), 1521 (s),
1474 (s), 1404 (s), 1278 (m), 1247 (m), 1214 (m), 1145 (m), 1050 (m),
1011 (m), 977 (m), 839 (m), 790 (m). Anal. Calcd for C33H22N8S2Hg:
C, 49.84; H, 2.79; N, 14.09%. Found: C, 49.66; H, 2.64; N, 14.15%。
measured by using a standard method under the same experi-
mental conditions for all compounds. Rhodamine B dissolved in
ethanol (
F
¼ 0.56) [9] at the same concentration as the other
samples was used as the standard. The two-photon excited fluo-
rescence (TPEF) spectra were measured using a Mira 900-D Ti:
sapphire femtosecond laser with a pulsewidth of 200 fs and
a repetition rate of 76 MHz. All measurements were carried out in
air at room temperature. TPA cross-sections were measured using
fluorescein as reference.
2.3. X-ray crystallography
Data for single crystals were collected on a Siemens Smart 1000
CCD diffractometer. The determination of unit cell parameters and
2.2. Materials and synthesis
data collections were performed with Mo
Ka
radiation
(
l
¼ 0.71073 Å). Unit cell dimensions were obtained with least-
All chemicals were available commercially from Acros Organics
company (Beijing) and Aladdin (Shanghai), and the solvents were
purified via conventional methods before use. IR spectra were
recorded with a Nicolet FT-IR NEXUS 870 spectrometer (KBr discs)
in the 4000e400 cmꢀ1 region. 1H NMR and 13C NMR spectra were
recorded on a 400 MHz NMR instrument using CDCl3 as solvents.
Mass spectra were obtained on a Micromass GCT-MS Spectrometer.
Elemental analysis was recorded on Perkin Elmer 240B instrument.
squares refinements, and all structures were solved by direct
methods using SHELXS-97 [12]. The other non-hydrogen atoms
were located in successive difference Fourier syntheses. The final
refinement was performed by using full-matrix least-squares
methods with anisotropic thermal parameters for non-hydrogen
atoms on F2. The hydrogen atoms were added theoretically and
processing parameters for Dye 4 and L are shown in Table 1 and the
selected bond lengths and bond angles are listed in Table 2.
2.2.1. Preparation of the ligand: (40-(4-[4-(1H-[1,2,4]-triazolyl)
styryl] phenyl)-2,20:60,200-terpyridine)
3. Results and discussion
The ligand was readily achieved in 78.1% yield by Solid-state
Wittig reaction with 4-(2,20:60,200-terpyridine-40-yl)-benzyl-
triphenylphosphonium bromide [10] and 4-(1H-[1,2,4]-triazol-1-
yl) benzaldehyde [11]. 1H NMR (CDCl3, 400 MHz): 7.47 (s, 2H),
7.53e7.56 (m, 2H), 7.85e7.87 (m, 4H), 7.92 (d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.00
(d, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.06 (t, J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.26 (s, 1H), 8.69 9 (d,
J ¼ 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.77e8.79 (m, 4H), 9.35 (s, 1H). Ms: m/z (%) ¼ 478.19
(100). FT-IR (KBr, cmꢀ1): 3427 (w), 3054 (w), 1583 (s), 1564 (m),
1522 (s), 1466 (m), 1388 (s), 1277 (w), 1147 (m), 965 (m), 839 (m),
789 (s), 671 (m), 537 (m). Calcd for C31H22N6: C, 77.79; H, 4.63; N,
17.58%. Found: C, 77.57; H, 4.92; N, 17.51%.
L crystallized in the monoclinic form with the space group P2(1)/C
as shown in Fig. 2(a). The unit contains two molecules. In each
molecule, the dihedral angel between the terpyridine ring and its
bonded benzene ring is 10.841ꢁ, showing a distorted plane.
Single crystal X-ray structural analysis shows that the asym-
metric unit of Dye 4 consists of one Hg(II), one L, two thiocyanate
anions (Fig. 3(a)). The Hg (II) center is five-coordinated by three
nitrogen atoms from one L and two sulfur atoms from two thio-
cyanate anions. The bond lengths Hg1eN1, Hg1eN2, Hg1eN3 are
2.417(9), 2.367(8), 2.39(1) Å respectively. Each bond angle around