Page 3 of 4
ChemComm
PS. However, the AIE amplification effect in PMMA was 45 fold) (Fig. 3d). PHEMA could be applied in an oral drugꢀ
weaker than it was in PS because the polarity of PMMA is
stronger than that of PS, and the wrapping of the fluorphore is
less effective.
delivery system, both as an optical sensor and as a
supplemental carrier to encase the hydrophobic drug
molecules effectively in the stomach.
5
The AIE phenomenon was much weaker in the PHEMA
In summary, an AIEꢀactive initiator is introduced to the
system. When water content was increased to 90 %, the 50 terminal of a polymer chain and enables the regular polymers
intensity was only 10ꢀfold higher than it was in the DMF
solution; it exhibited a weak emission at 570 nm, which was
similar to that of the initiator. This was because the polar
10 PHEMA chain could not easily hamper initiator ICT, and
obvious emission quenching was thus observed.
to emit dramatically. Although the AIE effect of this small
molecule is not distinctive, the obvious amplification of
polymers emission is observed. It should partly attributed to
the wrapping and coiling of flexible hydrophobic chains. The
55 AIE effect is originated from initiator TPPꢀNI, but amplified
through polymer chains or tuned by polarity of the polymer
side chains. The prepared polymers exhibit not only the AIE
effect of the terminal group but also the property of the
polymer chains, such as easy fabrication. In particular, the
The pressing question of how to recover the emission
remains. When sulfuric acid was added into the DMF
solution,
a gradual increase of emission intensity was
15 observed; it reached a maximum when the pH value was about
1. However, only a slight enhancement of emission intensity 60 PHEMA shows a pHꢀoptical sensitive phenomenon, which is
could be observed in similar PS and PMMA systems,
respectively (see Fig. S4ꢀ10). We tentatively propose the
following reasons for the AIE mechanism observed in
20 PHEMA: (i) although the dimethylamino (DMA) group in
not obvious in both small molecules and regular polymers
without such a fluorphore. We believe that such a method is
promising in preparation of AIE polymers and studying the
morphology of classical polymers using fluorescence.
TPPꢀNI is a wellꢀknown pH sensor in solution, TPPꢀNI itself 65 Acknowledgements The authors graciously thank Prof. Qingꢀ
could not dissolve in water, and the pH effect was nearly
unobservable; (ii) because the polarities of PS and PMMA
nanoparticles are low, there are few DMA groups anchored on
25 the particle surface, and the enhancement of emission is
Hua Xu (National University of Singapore) for such beneficial
discussion. The authors also thank the Chinese Natural
Science Foundation (21071105 and 21176164), the 863 Major
Project (SQ2009AA06XK1482331), PAPD and the Project of
limited; and (iii) hydrogen bonds between HEMA’s hydroxyl 70 Science and Technology of Suzhou (SYG201114).
group and the water molecule are destroyed in acid solution,
Notes and references
and thereafter the polymer aggregates. However, the polarity
of PHEMA causes the exposure of more dimethylamino
Department of polymer science, College of Chemistry, Chemical
30 groups on the surface, and the effect of the pH value is
75
Engineering and Materials Science, Soochow University, Suzhou,
China 215123.
amplified.
Eꢀmail: lujm@suda.edu.cn, xuqingfeng@suda.edu.cn; Fax: +86 (0) 512ꢀ
65880367; Tel: +86 (0)512ꢀ6588 0368
†Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: Experimental
80 section. See DOI: 10.1039/b000000x/
1(a) M. M. Cai, Z. Q. Gao, X. H. Zhou, X. P. Wang, S. F. Chen, Y. Z.
Zhao, Y. Qian, N. E. Shi, B. X. Mi, L. H. Xie and W. Huang, Phys.
Chem. Chem. Phys., 2012, 14, 5289; (b) Z. Q. Guo, W. H. Zhu and
H. Tian, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 6073; (c) J. A. Ho, H. C. Chang
85
90
95
and W. T. Su, Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 3246; (d) T. Y. Han, X. Feng,
B. Tong, J. B. Shi, L. Chen, J. G. Zhi and Y. P. Dong, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 416; (e) C. H. Li, T. Wu, C. Y. Hong, G. Q.
Zhang and S. Y. Liu, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 455; (f) V.
Bhalla, V. Vij, A. Dhir and M. Kumar, Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 3765;
(g) S. Kim, Q. D. Zheng, G. S. He, D. J. Bharali, H. E. Pudavar, A.
Baev and P. N. Prasad, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 2317.
2 (a) L. Tang, J. K. Jin, A. Qin, W. Z. Yuan, Y. Mao, J. Mei, J. Z. Sun
and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Commun., 2009, 4974; (b) A. J. Qin, L. Tang,
J. W. Y. Lam, C. K. W. Jim, Y. Yu, H. Zhao, J. Z. Sun and B. Z.
Tang, Adv. Funct. Mater. 2009, 19, 1891; (c) Y. N. Hong, J. W. Y.
Lam and B. Z. Tang, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011,40, 5361.(review); (d) H.
G. Lu, F. Y. Su, Q. Mei, X. F. Zhou, Y. Q. Tian, W. J. Tian, R. H.
Johnson and D. R. Meldrum, J. Polym. Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem.,
2012, 50, 890.
Figure 3 (a) Change in the relative PL intensity (I/I0) of initiator in the
DMF/water mixture. I0 = PL intensity in DMF solution. Concentration: 25
35 uM; excitation wavelength: 467 nm; (b) Change in QYs of PS in the
DMF/ethanol mixture; (c) Change in emission intensity of PHEMA in
DMF at different pH values; (d) Emission spectra of PHEMA in DMF, 100 3 (a) P. Theato, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 2011, 50, 5804; (b) S. Nojima, Y.
DMF/water mixture, and SGJ solution, respectively.
Ohguma, K. I. Kadena, T. Ishizone, Y. Iwasaki, K.Yamaguchi,
Macromolecules 2010, 43, 3916; (c) P. Y. Gu, C. J. Lu, Q. F. Xu, G.
J. Ye, W. Q. Chen, X. M. Duan, L. H. Wang and J. M. Lu, J. Polym.
Sci. Part A: Polym. Chem., 2012, 50, 480.
These characteristic differences of PHEMA make it more
40 attractive for future practical applications. We have utilized
PHEMA as a PL sensor in simulated gastric juice (SGJ)
solution. The λem of PHEMA in SGJ solution was blue
shifted by almost 10 nm, but the intensity was much higher
than those in the DMF (70ꢀfold) and DMF/water mixtures (7ꢀ
105 4 (a) J. Qiu and K. Matyjaszewski, Macromolecules 1997, 30, 5643; (b)
J. Ueda, M. Atsuyaman, M. Kamigaito and M. Sawamoto,
Macromolecules 1998, 31, 557.
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry [year]
Journal Name, [year], [vol], 00–00 | 3