6634
M. M. Van der Walt et al. / Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 22 (2012) 6632–6635
substituted
(IC50 = 0.043
phthalimide
homologue,
compound
6
l
M), compound 8a is approximately eightfold more
100
75
50
25
0
potent as a MAO-B inhibitor.15 Compound 8a also proved to be a
more potent MAO-B inhibitor than 5-benzyloxyisatin (4)
(IC50 = 0.103
and 8-(benzylsulfanyl)caffeine (7) (IC50 = 1.86
on the benzylsulfanyl ring with Cl, Br, F and OCH3, to yield 8b–e,
also resulted in highly potent inhibition, with these homologues
l
M),13 8-benzyloxycaffeine (5) (IC50 = 1.77
l
M)14
l
M).16 Substitution
exhibiting IC50 values of 0.0056–0.020 lM. It is interesting to note
that particularly the halogen substituted homologues 8b–d are
weaker MAO-B inhibitors than compound 8a. This is in contrast
to the results obtained with 8-benzyloxycaffeine (5), 5-ben-
zyloxyphthalimide (6) and 8-(benzylsulfanyl)caffeine (7), where
particularly bromine substitution on the phenyl ring leads to an
enhancement in MAO-B inhibitory potency.14–16 From these results
it may therefore be concluded that 5-(benzylsulfanyl)phthalimides
are highly potent MAO-B inhibitors and superior to the lead struc-
tures, compounds 4–7, of this study.
l
r
y
C50
=
C50
o
t
n
e
r
i
I
I
b
i
x
x
h
p
n
I
Although still considered as a potent MAO-B inhibitor, the
1
1
.
De
0
-
o
)
]
N
=
I
phenylsulfanyl homologue 8f (IC50 = 0.986
lM) was the weakest
[
R
(
]
I
[
inhibitor of the present series. In this case, however, halogen sub-
stitution in the phenyl ring to yield compounds 8g
(IC50 = 0.457 lM) and 8h (IC50 = 0.364 lM), resulted in enhanced
MAO-B inhibition. The (2-phenylethyl)sulfanyl substituted homo-
logue 8i was also found to be a potent MAO-B inhibitor with an
Figure 3. The reversibility of the inhibition of MAO-B by 8a. The enzyme was
preincubated with 8a at 10 Â IC50 and 100 Â IC50 for 30 min and then diluted to
0.1 Â IC50 and 1 Â IC50, respectively. For comparison, (R)-deprenyl, at 10 Â IC50 was
similarly incubated with MAO-B and diluted to 0.1 Â IC50. The residual enzyme
activities were subsequently measured.
IC50 value of 0.030 lM, approximately sixfold weaker than 8a.
Since both 8f and 8i are weaker MAO-B inhibitor than 8a, it
may be concluded that the benzylsulfanyl side chain is particu-
larly suitable for enhancing the MAO-B inhibitory potency of
phthalimide, and that neither a reduction in side chain length
(to yield 8f), nor an increase in chain length (to yield 8i) would
further increase inhibitory activity. The general suitability of
5-sulfanylphthalimides for MAO-B inhibition was further
demonstrated with the finding that the cyclohexylsulfanyl (8j)
and (3-methylbutyl)sulfanyl (8k) substituted homologues are also
(10 Â IC50), the MAO-B activities were not recovered (2.1% of con-
trol). Interestingly, after dilution of the 8a–MAO-B complex to
0.1 Â IC50 and 1 Â IC50, the enzyme activities are not recovered
to 90% and 50%, respectively, as expected. This result suggests
that, for the inhibition of MAO-B, 8a may possess a quasi-revers-
ible or tight-binding component.
In conclusion, the present study shows that 5-sulfanylphthali-
mides are potent and selective inhibitors of MAO-B. In this regard,
the benzylsulfanyl side chain is particularly suitable for enhancing
the MAO-B inhibitory potency of phthalimide. It is noteworthy that
potent MAO-B inhibitors with IC50 values of 0.179
0.015 M, respectively.
lM and
l
The 5-sulfanylphthalimides were found to also act as inhibitors
of MAO-A. Four homologues, 8b–d and 8k, exhibited IC50 values in
the nanomolar range, with 8c being the most potent MAO-A inhib-
compound 8a (IC50 = 0.0045
more potent than phthalimide (2) (IC50 = 134
l
M) is approximately 30,000-fold
l
M).15 This illus-
trates the importance of the C5 side chain for MAO-B inhibitory
activity. Based on their MAO-B inhibition potencies and appropri-
ate selectivity profiles, this study concludes that 5-sulfanylphthal-
imides are suitable lead compounds for the development of
antiparkinsonian drugs. From a design point of view it is notewor-
thy that a wide variety of C5 substituents yield 5-sulfanylphthali-
mides with potent MAO-B inhibitory actions. This suggests that
structural modifications made to the C5 side chain in order to im-
prove the properties of the compound are less likely to reduce
MAO-B inhibition potency.
itor with an IC50 value of 0.273 lM. As evident from the SI values,
all of the 5-sulfanylphthalimides were, however, selective inhibi-
tors of the MAO-B isoform. The most potent MAO-B inhibitor of
the series, 8a, is also the most selective inhibitor with an SI value
of 427. This compound may therefore be considered the most suit-
able homologue of the series where MAO-B selectivity is desired.
As already noted, MAO-A inhibition may lead to adverse effects
when combined with certain antiparkinsonian therapies. In con-
trast, 8c may be considered as a potent MAO inhibitor with com-
paratively low isoform selectivity.
Since it is reported that the benzyloxyphthalimide class of
MAO inhibitors interacts reversibly with MAO, the current study
examined if this property is also shared by sulfanylphthali-
mides.15 For this purpose, the reversibility of MAO-B inhibition
by the most potent sulfanylphthalimide MAO-B inhibitor, com-
pound 8a, was investigated by measuring the degree of enzyme
recovery after dilution of the enzyme-inhibitor complex. MAO-B
was preincubated with 8a at concentrations of 10 Â IC50 and
100 Â IC50 for 30 min and then diluted to 0.1 Â IC50 and
1 Â IC50, respectively.19 The results show that after dilution of
the enzyme-inhibitor complexes to concentrations of 8a equal
to 0.1 Â IC50 and 1 Â IC50, the MAO-B catalytic activities are
recovered to levels of approximately 72% and 28%, respectively,
of the control value (Fig. 3). This behavior is consistent with a
reversible interaction of 8a with MAO-B. In contrast, incubation
of MAO-B with the irreversible inhibitor (R)-deprenyl
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to André Joubert of the SASOL Centre for Chem-
istry, North-West University for recording the NMR spectra, and
the Mass Spectrometry Service, University of the Witwatersrand
for the MS analyses. Financial support for this work was provided
by the North-West University, the National Research Foundation
and the Medical Research Council, South Africa.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data associated with this article can be found,