X.-B. Yang et al. / Inorganic Chemistry Communications 25 (2012) 55–59
59
[14] A.S. Sitlani, E.C. Long, A.M. Pyle, J.K. Barton, DNA photocleavage by phenan-
threnequinone diimine complexes of rhodium(III): shape-selective recognition
and reaction, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 114 (1992) 2303–2312.
[15] D.J. Gravert, J.H. Griffin, Steric and electronic effects, enantiospecificity and
reactive orientation in DNA binding/cleaving by substituted derivatives of
[MnIIIsalen]+, Inorg. Chem. 35 (1996) 4837–4847.
[16] L.Z. Li, C. Zhao, T. Xu, H.W. Ji, Y.H. Yu, G.Q. Guo, H. Chao, Synthesis, crystal struc-
ture and nuclease activity of a Schiff base copper(II) complex, J. Inorg. Biochem.
99 (2005) 1076–1082.
[23] complex 1: IR (KBr, cm−1): 3253, 1602, 1364, 1268, 1172, 1091, 838, 651.
Conductance: 181 S cm2 mol−1 in DMF solutions. Anal. Calcd. for [C32H22CuN2O10
]
Cl2·2H2O: C, 50.24; H, 3.43; N, 3.66%. Found: C, 49.03; H, 3.65; N, 3.74%.
[24] complex 2: IR (KBr, cm−1): 3249, 1603, 1384, 1268, 1172, 1091, 836, 648.
Conductance: 174 S cm2 mol−1 in DMF solutions. Anal. Calcd. for [C34H27CuN3O10
]
Cl2·H2O: C, 50.54; H, 3.87; N, 5.20%. Found: C, 50.02; H, 3.70; N, 5.40%.
[25] J. Kang, Y. Liu, M.X. Xie, S. Li, M. Jiang, Y.D. Wang, Interactions of human serum al-
bumin with chlorogenic acid and ferulic acid, Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1674 (2004)
205–214.
[17] S. Dhar, M. Nethaji, A.R. Chakravarty, DNA cleavage on photoexposure at the d-d
band in ternary copper(II) complexes using red-light laser, Inorg. Chem. 45
(2006) 11043–11050.
[26] S.B. Bukhari, S. Memon, M. Mahroof-Tahir, M.I. Bhanger, Synthesis, characteriza-
tion and antioxidant activity copper–quercetin complex, Spectrochim. Acta 71
(2009) 1901–1906.
[18] P.U. Maheswari, S. Roy, H. Dulk, S. Barends, G. Weze, B. Kozlevcar, P. Gamez, J.
Reedijk, The square-planar cytotoxic [CuII(pyrimol)Cl] complex acts as an effi-
cient DNA cleaver without reductant, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128 (2006) 710–711.
[19] N. Shahabadi, S. Kashanian, F. Darabi, DNA binding and DNA cleavage studies of a
water soluble cobalt(II) complex containing dinitrogen Schiff base ligand: the ef-
fect of metal on the mode of binding, Eur. J. Med. Chem. 45 (2010) 4239–4245.
[20] X.B. Yang, Y. Huang, J.S. Zhang, S.K. Yuan, R.Q. Zeng, Synthesis, characterization
and DNA interaction of copper (II) complexes with Schiff base ligands derived
from 2-pyridinecarboxaldehyde and polyamines, Inorg. Chem. Commun. 13
(2010) 1421–1424.
[27] E.C. Long, J.K. Barton, On demonstrating DNA intercalation, Acc. Chem. Res. 23
(1990) 271–273.
[28] A. Wolf, G.H. Shimer, T. Meehan, Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons physically inter-
calate into duplex regions of denatured DNA, Biochemistry 26 (1987) 6392–6397.
[29] L.S. Lerman, Structural considerations in the interaction of DNA and acridines,
J. Mol. Biol. 3 (1961) 18–30.
[30] S. Satyanarayana, J.C. Dabrowiak, J.B. Chairs, Tris(phenanthroline)ruthenium(II)
enantiomer interactions with DNA: mode and specificity of binding, Biochemistry
32 (1993) 2573–2583.
[31] Plasmid DNA (pUC 19) cleavage activity of complexes was monitored by using
agarose gel electrophoresis. In a typical experiment, supercoiled DNA (pUC 19)
(10 μg/mL, 10 μL) in Tris–HCl (100 mM, pH 7.4) was treated with different con-
centrations of complexes, followed by dilution with the Tris–HCl buffer to a
total volume of 30 μL. The samples were then incubated at 37 °C for 6 h, and load-
ed on a 0.7% agarose gel containing 1.0 μg/mL ethidium bromide. Electrophoresis
was carried out at 40 V for 30 min in TAE buffer and run in duplicate. Bands were
visualized by UV light and photographed followed by the estimation of the inten-
sity of the DNA bands using a Gel Documentation System.
[21] L1: IR (KBr, cm−1): 3291, 3115, 1644, 1570, 1501, 1309, 1173, 838. 1H NMR
(600 MHz, DMSO, TMS) δ (ppm): 2.63–2.66 (m, 4H), 6.05 (s, 2H), 6.26 (s, 2H),
6.89–6.91(d, 4H), 8.02–8.03 (d, 4H). Anal. Calcd. For C32H24N2 O10·2H2O: C,
60.76; H, 4.46; N, 4.43%. Found: C, 60.35; H, 4.56; N, 4.38%.
[22] L2: IR (KBr, cm−1): 3318, 3116, 1659, 1569, 1505, 1312, 1177, 823. 1H NMR
(600 MHz, DMSO, TMS) δ (ppm): 2.61–2.70 (m, 8H), 5.99 (s, 2H), 6.20 (s, 2H),
6.88–6.89(d, 4H), 8.02–8.03 (d, 4H). Anal. Calcd. For C34H29N3 O10·2H2O: C,
60.44; H, 4.92; N, 6.22%. Found: C, 60.15; H, 4.96; N, 6.16%.