J. P. Cros et al. / Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 14 (2003) 1965–1968
1967
enantioselective catalytic species is operating to control
stereoselectivity in both cases. The fact that (R)-3b (2
equiv. (R)-BINOL) affords (R)-6a in higher e.e. than
(R)-3a (1 equiv. (R)-BINOL) would then simply be due
to a higher concentration of the enantioselective cata-
lytic species (2 equiv. (R)-BINOL) being present when
(R)-3b is employed for reaction.
Potential catalytically active species that have been
proposed previously that satisfy this criteria include
(R,R)-8 derived from 2 equiv. of (R)-BINOL and 1
equiv. of boron;6 or (R,R,R)-9 containing 3 equiv. of
(R)-BINOL and 2 equiv. of boron.5f Secondly, the need
for stoichiometric amounts of boron reagent in these
reactions suggest that boron is coordinated to reactants
or products (or both) throughout the course of the
reaction.16 Thirdly, a cyclic chiral boron–BINOL com-
plex with enhanced Lewis acidity affords (R)-6a at a
significantly faster rate than the corresponding acyclic
complex (PhO)3B affords (rac)-6a. Finally, rapid
dynamic ligand exchange of aryloxy ligands occurs
between all of the aryloxy–boron complexes present in
solution, thus ensuring that (R)-BINOL is always avail-
able for the competing formation of the more reactive
enantioselective complex, even when (R)-BINOL is
employed as a chiral ligand in sub-stoichiometric
amounts.
In order to probe how effectively dynamic ligand
exchange was occurring in these reactions, we carried
out a series of aza-Diels–Alder reactions using chiral
boron reagents prepared from 1 equiv. of (PhO)3B and
sub-stoichiometric quantities of (R)-BINOL. We rea-
soned that if dynamic ligand exchange was occurring,
then turnover of (R)-BINOL between the different
chiral and achiral boron–aryloxy complexes would
occur in these reactions. Since chiral BINOL–boron
complexes afford (R)-6a at a significantly faster rate
than achiral (Ph3O)B complexes afford (rac)-6a then
aryloxy ligand turnover should result in (R)-6a being
formed in a significantly higher e.e. than expected if a
simple linear relationship relating the concentration of
(R)-BINOL to the e.e. of (R)-6a was in operation.
It is likely that similar non-linear effects, dynamic
ligand exchange and ligand accelerated catalysis are
operating in other reaction scenarios where these type
of chiral boron–BINOL reagents have been employed
for asymmetric catalysis. Further investigations are cur-
rently underway in our laboratory to further delineate
the mechanism of these reactions.
Consequently, the aza-Diels–Alder reaction between N-
benzylphenylimine 4a and 5 was carried out using 1
equiv. of a new chiral boron reagent prepared from 1
equiv. of (PhO)3B and 0.1 equiv. of (R)-BINOL (10
mol%) which resulted in formation of (R)-6a in 15%
e.e. This value was clearly greater than the 7.7% e.e.14
for (R)-6a that would have been expected if a linear
relationship relating the concentration of (R)-BINOL
to the e.e. of (R)-6a had occurred. We next carried out
an inverse addition protocol in an attempt to minimise
the background racemic reaction catalysed by (PhO)3B,
whereby dropwise addition of 1 equiv. of (PhO)3B in
CH2Cl2 to a solution of (R)-BINOL (10 mol%), 4a (1
equiv.) and 5 (1 equiv.) in CH2Cl2 at −78°C, over a
period of 5 h, gave (R)-6a in an improved 42.5% e.e.
Finally, use of a syringe pump enabled us to increase
the length of time of inverse addition of PhO3B to 16 h
resulting in a further increase in the enantioselectivity
of (R)-6a to 47% e.e. Thus, it was concluded that
dynamic ligand exchange of (R)-BINOL between chiral
and achiral boron–aryloxy complexes was occurring in
solution, with (R)-6a being formed in an enhanced e.e.
due to the increased rate of the enantioselective
reaction.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank the Royal Society (T.D.J.,
S.D.B.) and the University of Bath (Y.P.F.) for finan-
cial support.
References
1. (a) James, T. D.; Shinkai, S. Top. Curr. Chem. 2002, 218,
159; (b) The increase in boron Lewis acidity for cyclic
boronate esters over their corresponding acyclic ana-
logues has been ascribed to the change in the OꢀBꢀO
bond angle from 120° to around 108° for the cyclic
system. For detailed discussion of this phenomenon, see:
Ref. 1(a).
2. (a) Hattori, K.; Yamamoto, H. J. Org. Chem. 1992, 57,
3264; (b) Hattori, K.; Yamamoto, H. Tetrahedron 1993,
49, 1749.
Clearly, the principle of employing sub-stoichiometric
amounts of a chiral ligand to amplify stereoselectivity
in this manner is a potentially powerful atom efficient
strategy,15 that may be applicable in alternative reac-
tion scenarios where other stoichiometric chiral
reagents that undergo dynamic ligand exchange are
employed for asymmetric synthesis.
3. (a) Hattori, K.; Yamamoto, H. Synlett 1993, 129; (b)
Lock, R.; Waldmann, H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996, 37,
2753; (c) Lock, R.; Waldmann, H. Chem. Eur. J. 1997, 3,
143.
4. (a) Hattori, K.; Miyata, M.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 1151; (b) Hattori, K.; Yamamoto,
H. Synlett 1993, 239; (c) Hattori, K.; Yamamoto, H.
Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 1993, 3, 2337; (d) Hattori, K.;
Yamamoto, H. Tetrahedron 1994, 50, 2785.
5. For selected examples of other chiral boron reagents
derived from enantiopure BINOL (and its derivatives) for
asymmetric catalysis, see: (a) Kelly, T. R.; Whiting, A.;
Chandrakumar, N. S. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 3510;
(b) Ishihara, K.; Yamamoto, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1994,
In conclusion, we propose that the results described
herein, and elsewhere,2,3 are consistent with the follow-
ing reaction mechanism. Firstly, non-linear effects
obtained using scalemic BINOL demonstrate that the
enantioselective species responsible for asymmetric
induction contains at least 2 equiv. of (R)-BINOL.