Table 1 Evaluation of catalysts for nitroalkene Diels–Alder reactiona,b
Table 2 Nitroalkene Diels–Alder reaction with different dienesa,b
Entry
Ar
Yieldc (%)
erd
1e
2
Ph
77
80
38
80
67
30 : 70
65 : 35
66 : 34
64 : 36
69 : 31
4-F–Ph
4-Cl–Ph
4-Cl–Ph
3-Cl–Ph
3
4f
5
Entry
Catalyst
R
Yieldd (%)
ere
1
2
—
1
—
<5
70
—
64 : 36
a Reaction conditions: diene (0.4 mmol) and nitroethylene (0.2 mmol) in
the presence of 10 mol% of catalyst in CH2Cl2 (0.7 mL). b The absolute
stereochemistry of the 4-Cl substituted product (Table 2, entries 3 and 4)
was established by X-ray analysis. The rest were assigned by analogy.13
c Yield of isolated products. d Determined by chiral HPLC analysis.
e (P)-5 was used. f (M)-1 was used.
3f
4
2
3
84
70
38 : 62
59.5 : 40.5
5
6
4
5
70
77
67 : 33
70 : 30
Notes and references
1 Selected references: (a) J. N. Payette and H. Yamamoto, Angew. Chem.,
Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 8060; (b) E. P. Balskus and E. Jacobsen, Science,
2007, 317, 1736; (c) S. A. Snyder and E. J. Corey, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2006, 128, 740; (d) R. M. Wilson, W. S. Jen and D. W. C. MacMillan,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2005, 127, 11616; (e) E. J. Corey, T. Shibata and
T. W. Lee, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2002, 124, 3808. For selected reviews of
asymmetric Diels–Alder reactions, see: (f) A. Erkkilä, I. Majander and
P. M. Pihko, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107, 5416; (g) E. J. Corey, Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed., 2002, 41, 1650.
2 Selected references: (a) N. Çelebi-Ölçüm, D. H. Ess, V. Aviyente and
K. N. Houk, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 4528; (b) S. E. Denmark,
B. S. Kesler and Y.-C. Moon, J. Org. Chem., 1992, 57, 4912.
3 N. Takenaka, R. S. Sarangthem and S. K. Seerla, Org. Lett., 2007, 9,
2819.
a Reaction conditions: diene (0.4 mmol) and nitroethylene (0.2 mmol) in
the presence of 10 mol% of catalyst in CH2Cl2 (0.7 mL). b The absolute
stereochemistry of the 4-Cl substituted product (Table 2, entries 3 and 4)
was established by X-ray analysis. The rest were assigned by analogy.13
c −X = tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borate. d Yield of isolated
products. e Determined by chiral HPLC analysis. f (P)-catalyst was used.
4 Selected references: (a) L.-Y. Wu, G. Bencivenni, M. Mancinelli,
A. Mazzanti, G. Bartoli and P. Melchiorre, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009,
48, 7196; (b) D.-Q. Xu, A.-B. Xia, S.-P. Luo, J. Tang, S. Zhang,
J.-R. Jiang and Z.-Y. Xu, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2009, 48, 3821;
(c) H. Sundén, R. Rios, Y. Xu, L. Eriksson and A. Córdova, Adv. Synth.
Catal., 2007, 349, 2549; (d) R. Thayumanavan, B. Dhevalapally,
K. Sakthivel, F. Tanaka and C. F. Barbas, III, Tetrahedron Lett., 2002, 43,
3817.
5 K. J. Bartelson, R. P. Singh, B. M. Foxman and L. Deng, Chem. Sci.,
2011, 2, 1940.
6 Selected references: (a) F. Li, S. S. Tartakoff and S. L. Castle, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2009, 131, 6674; (b) T. Mugishima, M. Tsuda, Y. Kasai,
H. Ishiyama, E. Fukushi, J. Kawabata, M. Watanabe, K. Akao and
J. Kobayashi, J. Org. Chem., 2005, 70, 9430.
R substitution (Table 1, entries 3–6). Using catalyst 5, we carried
out a short screening of different dienes to obtain some idea
regarding the potential scope of this protocol. We were glad to
find that other dienes were tolerated well (Table 2, entries 2–5).
However, the reason for the low yield obtained with the
4-Cl-substituted diene (entry 3) was not immediately clear to us
since all of those dienes are equally reactive under the thermal
reaction condition (i.e., without a catalyst). We hypothesized that
there might be steric repulsion between 4-Cl-substitution and the
catalyst in the transition state, and thus we tested the sterically
less demanding catalyst 1. We were pleased to find that it gave
the product in high yield (entry 4).
In conclusion, we successfully demonstrated that the nitro-
alkene Diels–Alder reaction can be rendered enantio- and
periselective by chiral hydrogen bond donor catalysts. This rep-
resents, to our knowledge, the first asymmetric catalytic nitro-
alkene Diels–Alder reaction by LUMO-lowering catalysis.
Further optimizations of the catalyst structures and substrate
scope study are currently undertaken and will be reported in due
course.
7 Selected reference: S. Ranganathan, D. Ranganathan and A. K. Mehrotra,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1974, 96, 5261.
8 The Diels–Alder reaction of cyclopentadiene and 2-chloroacrylonitrile
followed by ring opening, see: E. J. Corey, N. M. Weinshenker,
T. K. Schaaf and W. Huber, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1969, 91, 5675.
9 Selected references: (a) Y. Fujiwara and G. C. Fu, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2011, 133, 12293; (b) X. Han, Y. Wang, F. Zhong and Y. Lu, J. Am.
Chem. Soc., 2011, 133, 1726; (c) H. Xiao, Z. Chai, C.-W. Zheng,
Y.-Q. Yang, W. Liu, J.-K. Zhang and G. Zhao, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
2010, 49, 4467; (d) B. J. Cowen and S. J. Miller, J. Am. Chem. Soc.,
2007, 129, 10988; (e) P.-C. Chiang, J. Kaeobamrung and J. W. Bode,
J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 3520; (f) J. E. Wilson and G. C. Fu,
Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2006, 45, 1426; (g) H. M. L. Davies,
B. Xiang, N. Kong and D. G. Stafford, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2001, 123,
7461.
This work was supported by the Florida Department of
Health (07KN-12) and the National Science Foundation
(CHE-1152850). The mass spectrometer used was financed by
the National Science Foundation (CHE-0946858).
10 Selected reviews: (a) X. Yu and W. Wang, Chem. Asian J., 2008, 3,
516; (b) A. G. Doyle and E. N. Jacobsen, Chem. Rev., 2007, 107,
5713; (c) M. S. Taylor and E. N. Jacobsen, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.,
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2012
Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012, 10, 9134–9136 | 9135