Article
Hazeri et al.
Table 1. The effect of different catalyst on the synthesis of
piperidine 4a[a]
ferent solvents at ambient temperature. As shown in Table
1, the best result was obtained in the presence of 20 mol%
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O in EtOH (Table 1, Entry 14). It is notewor-
thy that the increasing of catalyst loading to 25 mol% had
no improving effect on the yield of product. When the reac-
tion proceeded in the absence of catalyst no product was
obtained, which this observation indicated that the cata-
lyst’s presence is necessary for this transformation. Low
yields were obtained when water or solvent-free conditions
was employed.
Yield
(%)[b]
Entry
Catalyst (mol%)
Solvent Time (h)
1
LiCl (10)
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
EtOH
MeOH
MeCN
H2O
48
48
48
48
48
48
24
48
24
24
12
18
6
¯
5
2
KI (10)
3
CuCl2 (10)
38
25
¯
¯
35
10
30
50
72
55
84
91
90
87
70
30
37
¯
4
Al2(SO4)3·18 H2O (10)
Cu(OAc)2·H2O (10)
AgNO3 (10)
5
6
7
Zr(NO3)2 (10)
8
Mg(NO3)2·4H2O (10)
Zn(NO3)2·6H2O (10)
Mn(NO3)2·4H2O (10)
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (10)
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (5)
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (15)
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (20)
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (25)
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (20)
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (20)
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (20)
Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (20)
No Catalyst
To investigate the generality and the scope of this
one-pot three-component reaction, the optimized reaction
conditions as described above was extended to various aro-
matic aldehyde, aromatic amine and methyl and/or ethyl
acetoacetate. The results are summarized in Table 2. Vari-
ous sensitive functionality groups such as Me, OMe, NO2,
F, Cl and Br were tolerated during the reaction. All reac-
tions proceeded efficiently and cleanly and the desired
products were obtained in good to excellent yields. How-
ever, no product was obtained from the reaction of p-di-
methylamino benzaldehyde, p-anisidine and methyl aceto-
acetate (Table 2, entry 29). The structures of all compounds
were characterized by comparison of IR, 1H and 13C NMR
spectra with authentic samples. Also, the relative stereo-
chemistry of these piperidines has been confirmed by sin-
gle X-ray crystallography analysis in previously reported
literature.18-26,30
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
18
20
5
5
5
7
24
16
48
Neat
EtOH
[a] Experimental conditions: 4-methyl benzaldehyde (2 mmol),
aniline (2 mmol), and methyl acetoacetate (1 mmol), rt. [b] Iso-
lated yield.
data of selected products are represented below.
Methyl 1-phenyl-4-(phenylamino)-2,6-dip-tolyl-1,2,5,6-
tetrahydropyridine-3-carboxylate (4a)
In summary, an efficient and simple method has been
developed for the formation of highly functionalizaed
piperidines via one-pot three-component reaction cata-
lyzed by Fe(NO3)3·9H2O. This methodology offered sev-
eral advantages such as mild reaction conditions, simplic-
ity in operation, good to excellent yields, simple and readily
available precursors, which make it a useful and attractive
process for synthesis of these important compounds.
1
White solid. H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 2.25 (3H, s,
CH3), 2.32 (3H, s, CH3), 2.75 (1H, dd, J = 15.2, 2.4 Hz, H¢-5),
2.84 (1H, dd, J = 15.2, 5.6 Hz, H²-5), 3.93 (3H, s, OCH3), 5.09
(1H, d, J = 3.1 Hz, H-6), 6.32 (2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH), 6.37 (1H,
s, H-2), 6.48 (2H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, ArH), 6.60 (1H, t, J = 7.2 Hz,
ArH), 7.00-7.12 (11H, m, ArH), 7.20 (2H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, ArH),
10.29 (1H, s, NH).
Ethyl 4-(3,4-dichlorophenylamino)-1-(3,4-dichloro-
phenyl)-2,6-dip-tolyl-1,2,5,6-tetrahydropyridine-3-car-
boxylate (4i)
EXPERIMENTAL
General procedure for synthesis of highly function-
alized piperidine 4
White solid. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): d 1.50 (3H, t, J =
6.4 Hz, OCH2CH3), 2.34 (3H, s, CH3), 2.35 (3H, s, CH3), 2.73
(1H, d, J = 15.2 Hz, H¢-5), 2.90 (1H, dd, J = 15.2, 5.6 Hz, H²-5),
4.31-4.40 (1H, m, OCHaHb), 4.46-4.54 (1H, m, OCHaHb), 5.08
(1H, br s, H-6), 6.16 (2H, d, J = 7.2 Hz, ArH), 6.36 (1H, s, H-2),
6.43 (2H, d, J = 7.8 Hz, ArH), 6.96-7.23 (10H, m, ArH), 10.24 (s,
1H, NH); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): d 14.8 (OCH2CH3), 21.6
(CH3), 21.8 (CH3), 33.4 (C-5), 55.3 (C-2), 58.2 (C-6), 59.8
(OCH2CH3), 98.9 (C-3), 108.3, 114.6, 119.2, 123.5, 123.5, 126.9,
First, a solution of aromatic amine (2 mmol) and b-keto-
ester (1 mmol) in ethanol (5 mL) was stirred for 30 min in the
presence of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O (20 mol%) at ambient temperature.
Next, the aromatic aldehyde (2 mmol) was added and the reaction
mixture was allowed to stir for appropriate time. The progress of
the reaction was monitored by TLC. After completion of the reac-
tion, the resulting precipitates were collected by filteration and
washed with EtOH (3 × 2 mL) to give the pure product. Spectral
356
© 2013 The Chemical Society Located in Taipei & Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
J. Chin. Chem. Soc. 2013, 60, 355-358