Q. Yang et al. / Catalysis Communications 29 (2012) 194–197
195
To get L3, 1,1-′(pyridine-2,6-diyl)bis(butane-1,3-dione) (123 mg,
0.5 mmol) which was prepared in the reported method was dissolved
in acetic acid (5 mL) in a two-necked round bottom flask. Then a
10 mL acetic acid solution of methyl hydrazine was slowly added
into the solution through a funnel at room temperature. The mixture
was then heated to 60 °C and stirred overnight, then cooled. A sodi-
um carbonate solution was slowly added into the cooled solution to
adjust it to neutral pH and then some white crystals were formed.
The crystals were filtered, washed with water, and dried under vacu-
um to give L3 as white solid. Isolated yield: 53% (141 mg). Mp: 208–
209 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.74 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 2H, pyridine),
7.68–7.55 (m, 1H, pyridine), 6.75 (s, 2H, pyrazole), 3.78 (s, 6H,
N-CH3), 2.26 (s, 6H, C-CH3); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 11.2
(CH3), 36.3 (N-CH3), 104.3 (3-pyrazole), 117.9 (3-pyridine), 136.8
(2-pyrazole), 139.7 (4-pyridine), 150.6 (4-pyrazole), 151.9 (2-pyri-
dine). HRMS-ESI. calcd. for C15H18N5 (M+H)+ =268.1562, found
268.1564.
For L2, L5, and L6, methylhydrazine, 4-(trifluoromethyl)
phenylhydrazine and 3-(methylphenyl)hydrazinethe are treated with
3,3′-(pyridine-2,6-diyl)bis-(1-phenylpropane-1,3-dione), respectively,
under similar conditions. L5 (yield of 26%): white solid. Mp: 254–
256 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.15 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 2H, pyridine),
7.92 (t, J=7.4 Hz, 1H, pyridine), 7.63 (d, J=8.0 Hz, 4H, phenyl),
7.58–7.44 (m, 6H, phenyl), 7.36 (d, J=11.2 Hz, 10H, phenyl). 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 153.2 (2-pyridine), 151.3 (3-pyrazole),
144.8 (5-pyrazole), 142.9 (4-pyridine), 137.4 (phenyl), 130.3 (phenyl),
129.1 (phenyl), 128.9 (phenyl), 128.8 (phenyl), 126.1 (phenyl), 126.1
(phenyl), 125.2 (phenyl), 124.98 (phenyl), 122.5 (3-pyridine), 108.0
(4-pyrazole). HRMS-ESI. calcd. for C37H24F6N5 (M+H)+=652.1936,
found 652.1953.
7.60–7.34 (m, 10H, phenyl), 7.14 (s, 2H, pyrazole), 3.98 (s, 6H, N-CH3);
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 37.8(\CH3), 105.2 (4-pyrazole), 118.4
(3-pyridine), 128.5 (3-pyridine), 128.7 (phenyl), 128.8 (phenyl), 130.7
(phenyl), 137.1 (4-pyridine), 145.1 (5-pyrazole), 151.0 (3-pyrazole),
151.8 (2-pyridine). HRMS-ESI. calcd. for
C =
25H22N5 (M+H)+
392.1875, found 392.1879. The structure of L2 was further identified
by its single crystal structure. The single crystal was obtained by evapo-
ration of a CDCl3 solvent. The exact structure was shown in Fig. 1.
3. Result and discussion
It is well known that a ligand plays an important role in modifying
the efficiency of a catalyst in a homogeneous catalysis [8]. With the
six ligands in hand, the effects of the ligand structures and reaction
conditions on the Suzuki–Miyaura coupling were investigated in detail.
We chose the coupling of phenylboronic acid and 4-bromoanisole
as the model reaction. The effect of solvents on the reaction was first-
ly investigated at a low reaction temperature of 50 °C with L1 as the
model ligand and KOH as the base (Table 1, entries 1–6). The reaction
gave the highest yield in ethanol. The other solvents, whether they
are protonic or aprotic solvents, gave lower yields. Subsequently,
the effect of bases on the reaction was explored. The organic base
and the weak inorganic base NaHCO3 were less efficient for the reac-
tion. By increasing the basicity of the bases, the conversion of the
substrate was improved. The strong base KOH gave the highest con-
version (Table 1, entries 7–10). Even if performed at room tempera-
ture, the reaction could proceed smoothly and give a yield of 58% in
half an hour, which is higher than most of the N-donor catalyst sys-
tems at room temperature [7,16,21,22]. If the reaction temperature
was elevated to 70 °C, the desired product can be obtained with a
quantitative yield in 0.5 h. In order to shorten the reaction time in
the high ratio of substrate to catalyst, 70 °C was chosen as the reac-
tion temperature in the following reactions. KOH and ethanol were
used as the optimum base and solvent, respectively.
L6 (yield of 17%): white solid. Mp: 189–192 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 8.01 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 2H,3-pyridine), 7.74 (t, J=7.8 Hz, 1H,
2-pyridine), 7.26 (d, J=6.8 Hz, 13H, phenyl), 7.14 (t, J=7.7 Hz, 3H,
phenyl), 7.07 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 2H, phenyl), 7.00 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 2H,
4-pyrazole), 2.29 (s, 6H,-CH3). 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 144.5
(2-pyridine), 140.1 (3-pyrazole), 139.1 (5-pyrazole), 130.7 (4-pyridine),
128.8 (phenyl), 128.6 (phenyl), 128.4 (phenyl), 128.2 (phenyl), 126.0
(phenyl), 122.6 (phenyl), 119.1 (phenyl), 106.9 (4-pyrazole), 21.3
(\CH3). HRMS-ESI. calcd. for C37H29N5 (M+H)+=544.2510, found
544.2537.
To detect the effect of ligand structures on the reaction, the six li-
gands were screened under the optimum conditions. The result was
shown in Scheme 1. Obviously, the existence of a phenyl ring, when-
ever it was on a nitrogen or carbon atom, was more favorable to im-
prove the catalyst activity than the ligand with the methyl group.
However, L3 and L4 gave unsatisfactory yields. It is supposed that
methyl as an electron-donating substituent on the pyrazole resulted
in the relatively low efficiency of L3. The hydrogen atom on the
L2 (yield of 67%). Mp: 216–218 °C. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.94
(d, J=7.8 Hz, 2H, 3-pyridine), 7.80 (t, J=7.8 Hz, 1H, 4-pyridine),
Fig. 1. ORTEP view of the molecular structure of L2.