ChemComm
Communication
over-expressing mice. This is consistent with [18F]1a binding to bA
aggregates, which was confirmed by an in vitro affinity assay. However,
the in vitro binding affinity of 1a for artificial bA aggregates was
relatively low (bA tracers like PIB, Florbetapir and Florbetaben have bA
binding affinities in the low nM range),16 therefore specific binding in
mice in vivo would normally not be expected. As there is little pre-
cedent for obtaining a specific signal in TG mice with a radiotracer of
high nM affinity for the target (and consequently, of low binding site
density), we hypothesised that [18F]1a may bind to Zn(II), and possibly
also to other metal cations (such as iron and copper) which are
present in bA plaques.10 This hypothesis was confirmed by showing
that the fluorescent analogue 9 targets bA plaques formed in the brain
of TG APP/PS1 mice, and co-localises with the pooled Zn(II) within bA
plaques. Conversely, GABAA receptors are very unlikely to play a
significant role since (1) their expression is high in the cerebellum
and low in the striatum, thus not matching the tracer profile obtained
here (Fig. S5, ESI†); (2) isoflurane, which is also a GABAA ligand,17 was
used as anaesthetic for the in vivo PET imaging experiments.
Fig. 3 Triple staining of TG APP/PS1 mouse brain sections with bA antibody 6E10
(a), TSQ (b) and 9 (FLC-BARB) (c). Co-localisation is evident from merged images
(d). White bar: 50 mm. Arrows highlight multiple plaque labelling in images
acquired with a 10Â objective.
Notes and references
‡ The specific activity of [18F]1a could not be reliably measured because
A smaller peak accounting for ca. 31% of the whole radioactivity
(Rt = 3.5 min), which may be a metabolite, was detected. No
metabolism differences were detected between WT and TG mice.
Evidence for binding of compound 1a to bA was first sought using
in vitro matured (as confirmed by transmission electron micro-
scopy, Fig. S9, ESI†) recombinant bA. Aggregates were used to
validate the affinity of the barbiturate 1a for bA in a competitive
in vitro Congo Red (CR) binding assay. Absorbance of CR is
dependent upon binding to bA (measured at 530 nm), and was
reduced in a concentration dependent manner by 1a (Fig. S9b,
ESI†). The inhibitory profile indicated binding between the barbi-
turate and bA thus occluding CR interaction, with a KD of 123 nM.
Further studies were carried out using the fluorescent barbiturate
9, a fluorescein-analogue of 1a having the same C5-n-hexyl and ethyl
substituents (see ESI† for the synthesis of 9). Following treatment with
9, the tissue showed some labelling throughout the brain section, but
particularly intense fluorescence was detected in plaques and bA
aggregates (Fig. S9c, ESI†). Such labelling was neither seen following
incubation of brain sections from TG bA mice with the fluorophore
alone (Fig. S9c, ESI†), nor in wild-type brain sections (data not shown).
In separate labelling experiments, the specificity of labelling with 9 for
Zn(II) accumulations in bA plaque was confirmed via triple staining
with the bA specific antibody 6E10 as well TSQ, a fluorescent zinc
indicator (Fig. 3a–c).15 The antibody staining for bA in TG mouse
brain sections co-localised with the fluorescence of 9 (Fig. 3d), con-
firming the successful labelling of bA plaques formed within the brain
of TG bA mice, as well as with the pooled zinc within such plaques.
of its very low UV absorbance.
1 J. A. Richter and J. R. Holtman Jr, Prog. Neurobiol., 1982, 18, 275–319.
2 C. D’Hulst, J. R. Atack and R. F. Cooy, Drug Discovery Today, 2009, 14,
866–875.
3 D. Schrigten, H. J. Breyholz, S. Wagner, S. Hermann, O. Schober,
¨
M. Schafers, G. Haufe and K. Kopka, J. Med. Chem., 2012, 55, 223–232.
¨
4 A. Gee and B. Långstrom, Appl. Radiat. Isot., 1991, 42, 1195–1198.
5 (a) P. C. Srivastava, A. P. Callahan, E. B. Cunningham and
F. F. Knapp Jr, J. Med. Chem., 1983, 26, 742–746; (b) P. A. Mason
and B. Law, J. Labelled Compd. Radiopharm., 1982, 19, 357–364.
6 (a) M. Ohyama, M. Senda, K. Ishiwata, S. Kitamura, M. Mishina,
K. Ishii, H. Toyama, K. Oda and Y. Katayama, Ann. Nucl. Med., 1999,
13, 309–315; (b) S. Venneti, B. J. Lopresti and C. A. Wiley, Prog.
Neurobiol., 2006, 80, 308–322.
7 N. Moussier, L. Bruche, F. Viani and M. Zanda, Curr. Org. Chem.,
2003, 7, 1071–1080.
8 T. Ito, T. Suzuki, S. E. Wellman and I. K. Ho, Life Sci., 1996, 59, 169–195.
9 (a) A. Tochowicz, K. Maskos, R. Huber, V. D. Oltenfreiter, A. Yiotakis,
M. Zanda, W. Bode and P. Goettig, J. Mol. Biol., 2007, 371, 989–1006;
(b) M. S. Masoud, S. S. Haggag and E. A. Khalil, Nucleosides, Nucleo-
tides Nucleic Acids, 2006, 25, 73–87; (c) Y. Xiong, C. He, T. C. An,
C. H. Cha and X. H. Zhu, Transition. Met. Chem., 2003, 28, 69–73.
10 (a) B. Platt, J. Alzheimer’s Dis., 2006, 10, 203–213; (b) L. M. Sayre, G. Perry,
P. L. R. Harris, Y. Liu, K. A. Schubert and M. A. Smith, J. Neurochem.,
2000, 74, 270–278; (c) C. L. Masters, R. Cappai, K. J. Barnham and
V. L. Villemagne, J. Neurochem., 2006, 97, 1700–1725; (d) A. Rauk, Chem.
´
Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 2698–2715; (e) M. P. Cuajungco and K. Y. Faget, Brain
Res. Rev., 2003, 41, 44–56; ( f ) D. Beauchemin and R. Kisilevsky, Anal.
Chem., 1998, 70, 1026–1029; (g) S. A. James, I. Volitakis, P. A. Adlard,
J. A. Duce, C. L. Masters, R. A. Cherny and A. I. Bush, Free Radical
Biol. Med., 2012, 52, 298–302.
11 S. J. Yagai, J. Photochem. Photobiol., C, 2006, 7, 164–182.
12 T. C. Butler, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 1950, 100, 219–226.
13 A. Jyoti, A. Plano, G. Riedel and B. Platt, J. Alzheimer’s Dis., 2010, 22,
873–887.
14 B. Platt, B. Drever, D. Koss, S. Stoppelkamp, A. Jyoti, A. Plano, A. Utan,
G. Merrick, D. Ryan, V. Melis, H. Wan, M. Mingarelli, E. Porcu,
L. Scrocchi, A. Welch and G. Riedel, PLoS One, 2011, 6, e27068.
´
15 A. Cote, M. Chiasson, M. R. Peralta 3rd, K. Lafortune, L. Pellegrini
and K. Toth, J. Physiol., 2005, 566, 821–837.
16 (a) A. Manook, B. H. Yousefi, A. Willuweit, S. Platzer, S. Reder, A. Voss,
M. Huisman, M. Settles, F. Neff, J. Velden, M. Schoor, H. Von der Kammer,
H. J. Wester, M. Schwaiger, G. Henriksen and A. Drzezga, PLoS One, 2012,
7, e31310; (b) G. Poisnel, M. Dhilly, O. Moustie, J. Delamare, A. Abbas,
D. Guilloteau and L. Barre, Neurobiol. Aging, 2012, 33, 2561–2571.
17 F. Jia, M. Yue, D. Chandra, G. E. Homanics, P. A. Goldstein and
N. L. Harrison, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 2008, 324, 1127–1135.
In conclusion, PET imaging with the tracer [18F]1a showed repro-
ducible brain uptake and clearance in three mice genotypes. Signifi-
cantly different [18F]1a retention modes identified bA (but not tau)
c
794 Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 792--794
This journal is The Royal Society of Chemistry 2013