by other groups revealed that similar U-3-CRs can also be
catalyzed by zinc chloride (R1 = 2-hydroxyphenyl) and
sulphonated cellulose in ethanol.13,14
Our model substrates were ethyl isocyanoacetate, iso-
valeric aldehyde, and benzylamine (1 equivof each). As itis
shown in Scheme 2, in the model reaction without enzyme,
no formation of expected aminoamide 2 occurred. Also
conversion of ethyl isocyanoacetate was rather poor, even
after 4 days of stirring the substrates. On the other hand, in
the presence of Novozym 435, we observed full conversion
of ethyl isocyanoacetate after 24 h. Unexpectedly, under
these reaction conditions, we did not observe formation of
aminoamide 2. It turned out that the compound with
structure 1 was isolated as a main product (43% isolated
yield). We also observed only the slight formation of
2-isocyano-N-(phenylmethyl)ethanamide (3c). Based on
the chemical structure of the main product, we decided
to change the molar ratio of the substrates. Applying 1:2:1
to the aldehyde/amine/isocyanide ratio, the reaction yield
significantly increased up to 75% (Table 1, entry 1).
The wide spectrum of commercially available enzymes
was screenedasa biocatalyst for this reaction.22 The results
are summarized in Table 1. In general, Candida antarctica
lipase (native and immobilized) as well as Amano PS lipase
catalyzed the Ugi reaction. Among them, the best yield was
obtained when using Novozym 435 (Table 1, entry 1). We
also performed additional experiments in order to confirm
thatthe enzyme activity, not the presenceof a protein itself,
is responsible for the formation of the product 1. For this
purpose, we used inactivated CALB, but no formation of
compound 1 was observed (Table 1, entry 6).
The goal of the present paper is the presentation of
enzymes as catalysts for U-3-CRs. We examined the ability
of the lipases to catalyze the three-component Ugi reaction
by activating the imine A. Lipases are widely utilized for
numerous transformations, and they are known to exhibit
unexpected promiscuities.15À19 With regard to Ugi reac-
tions, lipases were previously used for stereoselective hy-
drolysis of glutaric anhydrides that provided in situ an
acidic substrate for U-4-CRs.20 However, to the best of our
knowledge, no Ugi reaction catalyzed by an enzyme has
been reported so far.
We present, herein, the first example of an enzyme-
catalyzed Ugi condensation of an amine, aldehyde, and iso-
cyanide which leads to formation of dipeptide 1 (Scheme 2).
Scheme 2. Enzyme-Catalyzed Ugi Reaction
The model reaction was carried out in toluene, but also
other solvents were examined.
Table 2. Solvent Influence on Enzymatic Ugi Reaction
entry
solvent
yield [%]a
Table 1. Enzymatic Screening
1
2
3
4
5
toluene
75
64
45
0
entry
enzyme
yield [%]a
chloroform
water
1
2
3
4
5
6
Novozym 435
75
41
41
15
19
0
Candida antarctica lipase (native)
Candida antarctica lipase acrylic resin
Candida cylindracea lipase
ethanol 96%
tetrahydrofuran
0
a Isolated yields.
Amano lipase PS
Candida antarctica lipase (deacivated)
a Isolated yields. Reaction conditions: amine (2 equiv), aldehyde
The results presented in Table 2 show that initially
chosen toluene is the most efficient solvent; however a
high yield was also observed when chloroform was used as
a solvent (Table 2, entry 2). Compound 1 was not formed
in ethanol, despite the fact that it is considered to be a
proper solvent for Ugi reactions (as a protic solvent). Even
more significant is the observation that the reaction can
also be perfomed in water (Table 2, entry 3). Water is often
not compatible with the Ugi reaction due to isocyanide
decomposition which occurs in the presence of acids
in aqueous media. On the other hand, it is known that
(1 equiv), isocyanide (1 equiv, c = 0.02 M), enzyme (20%).21
(13) Shaabani, A.; Keshipour, S.; Shaabani, S.; Mahyari, M. Tetra-
hedron Lett. 2012, 53, 1641–1644.
(14) Mofakham, H.; Hezarkhani, Z.; Shaabani, A. J. Mol. Catal. A
2012, 360, 26–34.
(15) Bornscheuer, U. T.; Kazlauskas, R. J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2004, 43, 6032–6040.
(16) Wang, J.-L.; Liu, B.-K.; Yin, C.; Lin, X.-F. Tetrahedron 2011,
67, 2689–2692.
(17) Branneby, C.; Carlqvist, P.; Magnusson, A.; Hult, K.; Brinck,
T.; Berglund, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 874–875.
(18) Svedendahl, M.; Hult, K.; Berglund, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005,
127, 17988–17989.
(19) Li, K.; He, T.; Li, C.; Feng, X. W.; Wang, N.; Yu, X. Q. Green
Chem. 2009, 11, 777–779.
(21) For detailed experimental procedure, see the Supporting
Information.
(22) For detailed list of enzymes, see the Supporing Information.
(23) Faber, K. Biotransformations in Organic Chemistry; Springer-
Verlag: Berlin, 2004.
(20) Fryszkowska, A.; Frelek, J.; Ostaszewski, R. Tetrahedron 2005,
61, 6064–607221.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 3, 2013
567