The Langlois reagent was first developed in the 1980s,
for use as an electrophilic trifluoromethyl radical in the
addition of electron-rich double bonds and arenes.8 In
2011, Baran et al. reported a very efficient trifluoromethy-
lation of heterocycles by using the inexpensive and bench-
top stable solid CF3SO2Na.9 They also developed a direct
radical difluoromethylation of heteroarenes by using DFMS.10
Very recently, Sanford reported a copper-mediated trifluoro-
methylation of aryl boronic acids by using the Langlois
reagent.11 However, to the best of our knowledge, no
examples of metal-catalyzed direct formation of CvinylÀCF3
bonds by using Langlois’ reagent as well as CvinylÀCF2H
bond formation using DFMS have been reported.
tri- and difluoromethyl-substituted (E)-alkenes has been
developed.
Scheme 1. Formation of CvinylÀCF3/CvinylÀCF2H Bonds
On the other hand, a series of decarboxylative CÀC bond
formation reactions have been developed by Myers,12
Goossen,13 and Liu14 et al.15 over the past several years.
Very recently, we reported the first example of decarbox-
ylative olefination of various sp3 CÀH bonds via radical
additionÀelimination reactions of vinylic carboxylic
acids with alcohols, ethers, and hydrocarbons.16 Of par-
ticular interest in the radical processes, we began to
wonder whether CvinylÀCF3/CvinylÀCF2H bonds could
be constructed by a similar radical additionÀelimination
reaction of R,β-unsaturated carboxylic acids with a tri-
and difluoromethyl radical. Fortunately, an econom-
ical, convenient, and selective access to a variety of
(4) (a) Cho, E. J.; Buchwald, S. L. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 6552. (b)
Parsons, A. T.; Senecal, T. D.; Buchwald, S. L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 2947.
(5) He, Z.; Luo, T.; Hu, M.; Cao, Y.; Hu, J. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed.
2012, 51, 3944.
(6) Xu, J.; Luo, D. F.; Xiao, B.; Liu, Z. J.; Gong, T. J.; Fu, Y.; Liu, L.
Chem. Commun. 2011, 4300.
(7) Liu, T.; Shen, Q. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 2342.
Initially, we chose 2,5-dimethoxycinnamic acid as the model
substrate to optimize suitable conditions for this reaction
(Table 1; see also the Supporting Information (SI)). It was
found that the catalyst and radical initiator greatly effect
(8) (a) Tordeux, M.; Langlois, B. R.; Wakselman, C. J. Org. Chem.
1989, 54, 2452. (b) Langlois, B. R.; Laurent, E.; Roidot, N. Tetrahedron
Lett. 1991, 32, 7525. (c) Billard, T.; Langlois, B. R. Tetrahedron 1999, 55,
8065. (d) Tommasino, J. B.; Brondex, A.; Medebielle, M.; Thomalla, M.;
Langlois, B. R.; Billard, T. Synlett 2002, 1697.
(9) Ji, Y.; Brueckl, T.; Baxter, R. D.; Fujiwara, Y.; Seiple, I. B.; Su, S.;
Blackmond, D. G.; Baran, P. S. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108,
14411.
(10) Fujiwara, Y.; Dixon, J. A.; Rodriguez, R. A.; Baxter, R. D.;
Dixon, D. D.; Collins, M. R.; Blackmond, D. G.; Baran, P. S. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 1494.
reaction efficiency. The CuSO4 5H2O was more efficient
than copper(II) salts such as Cu(OTf)2, Cu(OAc)2, Cu-
(acac)2, CuO, CuCl2, CuF2, CuBr2, Cu(OAc)2 H2O, etc.
3
ꢀ
3
(entries 1À5). Other copper(I) salts such as CuCl, CuBr,
CuI, Cu2O, and (PPh3)2CuNO3 and other metal salts such
as Fe(OAc)2, Mn(OAc)2 4H2O, Co(OAc)2 4H2O, etc.
3
3
are less effective than CuSO4 5H2O (see the SI). The
3
desired product was isolated in 66% yield by using 10 mol %
CuSO4 5H2O. However, addition of 5 mol % and 15 mol %
€
(11) Ye, Y.; Kunzi, S. A.; Sanford, M. S. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 4979.
3
(12) (a) Myers, A. G.; Tanaka, D.; Mannion, M. R. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2002, 124, 11250. (b) Tanaka, D.; Myers, A. G. Org. Lett. 2004, 6,
433.
catalysts led to generation of the product in 54% and 47%
yields, respectively (entries 6 and 7). A mixed solvent of
CH2Cl2/H2O was proven to be more efficient than others
such as CH3CN/H2O, tBuOH/H2O, acetone/H2O, AcOH/
H2O, etc. (entries 8 and 9). The yield decreased to 32%
when 3 equiv of TBHP as the radical initiator were used
(entry 10). Other radical initiators such as di-tert-butyl
peroxide (DTBP), dicumyl peroxide (DCP), H2O2, K2S2O8,
and benzoyl peroxide (BPO) were found to be less effi-
cient than TBHP (see the SI). The desired product was
obtained in 45% and 40% yields at 25 and 80 °C,
respectively (entries 11 and 12). It is worth noting that
(E)-1,4-dimethoxy-2-(3,3,3-trifluoroprop-1-en-1-yl)benzene
was obtained as the major product and the ratio of E/Z was
up to 98/2.
(13) (a) Goossen, L. J.; Deng, G.; Levy, L. M. Science 2006, 313, 662.
(b) Goossen, L. J.; Rodrı
Levy, L. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 4824. (c) Goossen, L. J.;
Goossen, K.; Rodrıguez, N.; Blanchot, M.; Linder, C.; Zimmermann, B.
Pure Appl. Chem. 2008, 80, 1725. (d) Rodrıguez, N.; Goossen, L. J.
´
guez, N.; Melzer, B.; Linder, C.; Deng, G.;
´
´
Chem. Soc. Rev. 2011, 40, 5030. (e) Dzik, W. I.; Lange, P. P.; Goossen,
L. J. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3, 2671.
(14) (a) Zhang, S.-L.; Fu, Y.; Shang, R.; Guo, Q.-X.; Liu, L. J. Am.
Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 638. (b) Shang, R.; Ji, D.-S.; Chu, L.; Fu, Y.; Liu,
L. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2011, 50, 4470. (c) Shang, R.; Liu, L. Sci. China
Chem. 2011, 54, 1670.
(15) For selected examples, see: (a) Cornella, J.; Lu, P.; Larrosa, I.
Org. Lett. 2009, 11, 5506. (b) Jana, R.; Trivedi, R.; Tunge, J. A. Org.
Lett. 2009, 11, 3434. (c) Torregrosa, R. R. P.; Ariyarathna, Y.;
Chattopadhyay, K.; Tunge, J. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 9280.
(d) Yamashita, M.; Hirano, K.; Satoh, T.; Miura, M. Org. Lett. 2010, 12,
592. (e) Zhang, F.; Greaney, M. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010, 49,
2768. (f) Hu, P.; Shang, Y.; Su, W. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5945.
(g) Fang, P.; Li, M.; Ge, H. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 11898.
(16) Cui, Z.; Shang, X.; Shao, X. F.; Liu, Z. Q. Chem. Sci. 2012, 3,
2853.
To examine the scope of this system, the decarboxylative
coupling reactions of various cinnamic acids with sodium
B
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX