Synthesis and structure-activity relationships of novel ecdysteroid dioxolanes as MDR modulators in cancer

Article abstract of DOI:10.3390/molecules181215255

Ecdysteroids, molting hormones of insects, can exert several mild, non-hormonal bioactivities in mammals, including humans. In a previous study, we have found a significant effect of certain derivatives on the ABCB1 transporter mediated multi-drug resistance of a transfected murine leukemia cell line. In this paper, we present a structure-activity relationship study focused on the apolar dioxolane derivatives of 20-hydroxyecdysone. Semi-synthesis and bioactivity of a total of 32 ecdysteroids, including 20 new compounds, is presented, supplemented with their complete 1H- and 13C-NMR signal assignment.

Full text of DOI:10.3390/molecules181215255

Molecules 2013, 18, 15255-15275; doi:10.3390/molecules181215255
OPEN ACCESS
molecules
ISSN 1420-3049
www.mdpi.com/journal/molecules
Article
Synthesis and Structure-Activity Relationships of Novel
Ecdysteroid Dioxolanes as MDR Modulators in Cancer
Ana Martins 1,2,†,*, József Csábi 3,†, Attila Balázs 4, Diána Kitka 1, Leonard Amaral 5,
József Molnár 1, András Simon 6, Gábor Tóth 6 and Attila Hunyadi 3,*
1
Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunobiology, University of Szeged, Dóm tér 9,
Szeged 6720, Hungary; E-Mails: kitka.diana@gmail.com (D.K.);
molnar.jozsef@med.u-szeged.hu (J.M.)
2
Unidade de Parasitologia e Microbiologia Médica, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine,
Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira 100, Lisbon 1349-008, Portugal
3
Institute of Pharmacognosy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Szeged, Eötvös u. 6,
Szeged 6720, Hungary; E-Mail: csjoco88@gmail.com
4
Ubichem Research Ltd., Illatos út 33, Budapest H-1097, Hungary;
E-Mail: abalazs@ubichempharma.com
5
Center for Malaria and Other Tropical Diseases (CMDT), Institute of Hygiene and Tropical
Medicine, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Rua da Junqueira 100, Lisbon 1349-008, Portugal;
E-Mail: LAmaral@ihmt.unl.pt
6
Department of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, Budapest University of Technology and
Economics, Szt. Gellért tér 4, Budapest H-1111, Hungary;
E-Mails: andras.simon@mail.bme.hu (A.S.); drtothgabor@t-online.hu (G.T.)
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
* Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed;
E-Mails: martins.a@pharm.u-szeged.hu (A.M.); hunyadi.a@pharm.u-szeged.hu (A.H.);
Tel.: +36-62-546-456 (A.M. & A.H.); Fax: +36-62-545-704 (A.M. & A.H.).
Received: 31 October 2013; in revised form: 30 November 2013 / Accepted: 2 December 2013 /
Published: 10 December 2013
Abstract: Ecdysteroids, molting hormones of insects, can exert several mild, non-hormonal
bioactivities in mammals, including humans. In a previous study, we have found a significant
effect of certain derivatives on the ABCB1 transporter mediated multi-drug resistance of a
transfected murine leukemia cell line. In this paper, we present a structure-activity relationship
study focused on the apolar dioxolane derivatives of 20-hydroxyecdysone. Semi-synthesis

Molecules 2013, 18
15256
and bioactivity of a total of 32 ecdysteroids, including 20 new compounds, is presented,
supplemented with their complete 1H- and 13C-NMR signal assignment.
Keywords: ecdysteroids; 20-hydroxyecdysone; acetonide; dioxolane; stereochemistry;
cancer; multi-drug resistance; P-glycoprotein; ABCB1 transporter; efflux pump
1. Introduction
Ecdysteroids represent a large family of steroid hormones that play a crucial role in arthropods’
physiology. The most abundant representative of these compounds, 20-hydroxyecdysone (20E),
regulates the reproduction, embryogenesis, diapause and molting of arthropods [1]. Their role in plants
is still to be fully understood, but it had been suggested that they have high importance in
several plants as defensive agents against non-adapted herbivores [2]. An estimated 5%–6% of the
terrestrial plant species accumulate detectable levels of ecdysteroids, among which Ajuga, Serratula
and Silene spp., containing high amounts of these compounds, are good sources of ecdysteroids of
herbal origin [3].
Ecdysteroids generally retain the cholesterol-originated side-chain, typically contain 27–29 carbon
atoms and are substituted with 4–8 hydroxyl groups. Their A/B ring junction is usually cis, and a
characteristic 7-en-6-one (α,β-unsaturated ketone) chromophore group is present in their B-ring [4].
Due to their significantly different structure as compared to the vertebrate steroid hormones,
these compounds have no hormonal effects in humans [5]. On the other hand, a number of beneficial
metabolic effects are attributed to them [4–6], which has encouraged the production and worldwide
marketing of many food supplements, mainly containing the isolated ecdysteroid compound 20E [6].
In our recent studies, we found that certain ecdysteroid derivatives significantly decrease the
resistance of a multi-drug resistant (MDR) murine leukemia cell line expressing the human ABCB1
transporter to doxorubicin, a known chemotherapeutic agent that is a substrate of the ABCB1 transporter,
and we discussed the possible mechanisms that might be involved in this activity [7]. Based on
the observed structure-activity relationships of the isolated and semi-synthesized ecdysteroids,
20-hydroxyecdysone 2,3;20,22-diacetonide (1) was chosen as the most promising lead. Although the
acetonide moiety is generally utilized as an easy-to-remove protecting group for vicinal diols (which
removal needs a strong acidic environment), it is also an important structural element of certain drugs,
such as for example triamcinolone acetonide, which is not a pro-drug for triamcinolone but has
distinctly different pharmacological and pharmacokinetical properties [8]. Following our previous
work, we have synthesized several additional dioxolane derivatives and thoroughly discussed their
structure elucidation and stereochemistry [9]. In the study reported herein we present the synthesis,
structure elucidation and MDR-modulating activity of 32 ecdysteroid dioxolanes, including 20 new
derivatives, and provide further insights on the structure-activity relationships of these compounds.

Molecules 2013, 18
15257
2. Results and Discussion
2.1. Semi-Synthesis
Based on the formation of a common protecting group of vicinal diols, the acetonide, 32 compounds
containing one or two dioxolane rings were synthesized from 20-hydroxyecysone with various
aldehydes and ketones in the presence of phosphomolybdic acid. A summary of the reactions
performed and the structures of the products obtained are presented in Figure 1. 1H- and 13C-NMR data
of the new compounds are presented in Tables 1–3. To facilitate the comparison between the NMR
signals of structurally analogous hydrogen and carbon atoms in the different dioxolane compounds,
we applied a special numbering system for the central atoms (C-28 and C-29) of the 2,3- and
20,22-dioxolane structures. Compounds containing similar number of carbon atoms are presented in
one table, and compounds with the highest structural similarity are presented in neighbouring columns.
Figure 1. Semi-synthetic transformations of 20E and structures of the products obtained.
Substituents of the reagent oxo-compound (X1/X2 and X3/X4) typically correspond to
R1/R2 and R2/R3, respectively, except for compounds 18 and 19, where the reagent was
methyl-ethyl ketone. 15 was obtained as a side product from the synthesis of 23.
R1
Me
R2
Me
R3
Me
-Me
-H
R4
Me
-Me
-n-Pr
-n-Bu
-Et
-i-Bu
-Ph
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-H
-Et
-Me
-H
-Me
-H
-Ph
9
10
-E-ethenylbenzyl
-Z-ethenylbenzyl
-3-methoxy-4-
hydroxyphenyl
2-14,2202
-H
17-21, 23-33
1,17-19, 21-33
11
12
-
-
-
-
-H
-3-methoxy-4-
hydroxyphenyl
-H
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
-
-
-Et
-
-
-H
-4-benzyloxyphenyl
-4-benzyloxyphenyl
-H
-
-
-Et
-Me
-Et
-Et
-Me
-Et
-Me
-H
-
-H
-H
-Et
-H
-
-
-Me
-Me
-Et
-Me
-
-n-Pr
-n-Bu
-Et
-Ph
-H
-Me
-H
-Me
-Me
-H
-H
-Et
-H
210E
-Et
15
-n-Pr
-n-Bu
-Et
-Ph
-Ph
-Me
-Me
-n-Pr
-Et
-i-Bu
-Ph
-Ph
-Me
-Ph
-H
-H
-Me
-Et
-Me
-Me
-H
-Et
-Me
-H
-Me
-Me
-Me
-Me
-Me
-Me
-H
-Me
-Me
-Me
-Me
-Me
-n-Pr
-Me
-Me
16

Molecules 2013, 18
15258
1
Table 1. H- and 13C-NMR shifts of compounds 4, 6, 22, 30, 33, 9 and 10; in ppm, in
methanol-d4.
4
6
22
30
33
9
10
Atom no.
H
C
H
C
H
C
H
C
H
C
H
C
H
C
1α
β
1.43
1.79
3.84
3.95
1.74
1.70
2.39
-
1.43
1.79
3.84
3.95
1.75
1.70
2.39
-
1.17
2.00
4.21
4.11
2.01
1.97
2.24
-
1.22
1.98
1.16
1.99
1.43
1.79
1.44
1.79
3.84
3.95
1.74
1.71
2.39
-
37.5
37.5
39.6
38.8
39.6
37.5
37.5
2
68.8
68.6
68.8
68.6
72.8 4.26 73.6 4.21
75.0 4.30 73.2 4.12
72.8
75.1
3.84 68.8
3.95 68.6
68.8
68.6
3
4α
β
1.97
1.97
2.00
2.00
1.74
32.9
1.71
32.9
32.9
27.8
27.8
27.8
33.0
5
51.8
206.4
122.2
167.6
35.2
51.8
52.6 2.24 52.6 2.24
205.4 205.7
52.6
2.39 51.9
51.9
206.5
122.3
167.6
35.3
6
206.5
-
-
205.5
-
206.4
7
5.81
-
5.82 122.2 5.80 121.9 5.80 121.9 5.80 121.9 5.82 122.3 5.82
8
-
167.7
35.2
39.3
-
167.0
-
167.0
-
167.1
36.3
38.8
-
167.6
-
9
3.15
-
3.15
-
2.94
-
36.3 2.93 35.8 2.94
3.16 35.3
3.16
-
10
11α
β
39.0
38.8
21.6
-
38.9
21.7
-
-
39.3
21.6
39.4
1.69
1.80
1.84
2.11
-
1.69
1.80
1.86
2.12
-
1.69
1.78
1.84
2.10
-
1.66
1.77
1.85
2.11
-
1.70
1.79
1.83
2.11
-
1.68
1.80
1.86
2.13
-
1.71
1.81
1.87
2.13
-
21.6
32.3
21.6
32.4
21.8
32.4
21.6
32.3
12α
β
32.3
32.4
32.3
13
14
15α
β
48.4
85.3
48.6
85.4
48.7
85.3
48.8
85.3
48.8
85.4
48.4
85.3
48.5
85.3
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.95
1.62
1.94
1.89
2.35
0.86
0.97
-
1.95
1.62
2.03
1.89
2.32
0.83
0.96
-
1.96
1.61
1.94
1.90
2.36
0.86
0.97
-
1.95
1.61
2.03
1.86
1.95
1.59
2.03
1.86
1.97
1.63
2.00
1.94
2.01
1.64
1.93
1.90
2.40
0.92
0.97
-
31.9
22.7
31.8
22.5
31.7
22.7
31.7
22.5
31.7
22.5
31.9
22.8
31.9
22.9
16α
β
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
51.4
17.8
24.6
85.5
23.7
85.0
24.7
50.6
17.9
24.6
85.7
23.0
82.4
24.8
51.4 2.31 50.6 2.31
17.8 0.82 17.9 0.82
24.2 0.96 24.1 0.96
50.6
17.8
24.1
85.9
22.7
83.4
24.8
2.40 51.4
0.89 17.8
0.96 24.6
51.4
17.8
24.6
85.9
23.5
85.8
24.8
84.9
-
85.7
-
-
85.8
1.14
3.63
1.57
1.76
1.50
-
1.17
3.65
1.73
1.73
1.50
-
1.14
3.64
1.55
1.77
1.51
-
23.7 1.17 23.0 1.18
85.5 3.65 82.4 3.69
24.8 1.50 24.8 1.53
1.24 23.5
3.73 85.7
1.62 24.8
1.24
3.69
1.63
1.79
1.53
-
1.73
1.48
-
1.73
1.50
-
1.79
42.2
1.53
24
42.3
42.3
42.3
42.3
42.3
42.3
25
26
71.2
29.1
29.6
-
71.2
29.1
29.6
-
71.2
71.2
71.2
29.1
-
71.2
71.2
29.1
29.6
-
1.20
1.21
-
1.20
1.21
-
1.20
1.21
-
29.1 1.19 29.1 1.20
29.6 1.21 29.6 1.21
1.21 29.1
1.22 29.7
1.21
1.22
-
27
29.6
28
105.9
105.6
36.3
-
-
109.6
109.8
-
-
105.7
108.1
-
-
-
29
R1 1
-
105.6
-
109.8
-
105.2
-
100.6
1.67
1.41
1.39
0.93
4.93
4.91
1.59
1.63
1.46
0.97
38.8
18.8
14.5
2
27.5 1.47 28.9
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
3
23.8
-
-
4
14.5
R2 1
R3 1
R4 1
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.32 26.8 4.94
1.29 25.1 1.32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
4.91
1.59
1.29
1.64
1.45
1.80
0.94
0.97
25.1
52.3
27.3
5.41
5.47
36.4
36.4 1.65 52.2
1.44
6.13 128.5 5.67
6.74 135.7 6.78
130.9
135.8
2
3
4
1.38
1.38
0.92
27.5
23.8
14.5
26.1
25.0
24.0
1.38
1.38
0.92
27.6 1.80 26.2 1.39
23.8 0.94 25.0
14.5 0.97 24.0
29.5

Molecules 2013, 18
15259
Table 2. 1H- and 13C-NMR shifts of compounds 16–20 and 26–27; in ppm, in methanol-d4.
16
26
27
17
18
19
20
Atom no.
H
C
H
C
H
C
H
C
H
C
H
C
H
C
1α
β
1.22
1.99
1.16
2.02
4.21
4.13
2.00
2.00
2.25
-
1.22
1.98
1.25
1.99
4.25
4.27
1.97
1.97
2.25
-
1.22
1.98
4.27
4.33
1.98
1.98
2.22
-
1.17
2.02
4.21
4.13
2.00
2.00
2.25
-
1.43
1.79
38.9
39.8
39.0
39.0
39.0
39.8
37.5
2
4.26 73.6
4.31 73.3
73.1 4.27
75.3 4.33
73.2
72.8
73.6
73.3
73.2
73.8
73.1 3.84
75.3 3.95
68.8
68.6
3
4α
β
1.97
27.8
1.97
1.98
27.9
1.76
27.8
27.8
27.8
27.8
33.0
1.98
1.72
5
2.24 52.6
52.7 2.23
52.6
52.5
52.7
205.7
121.9
167.0
36.1
52.6 2.39
51.9
6
-
205.7
205.8
-
205.7
205.6
205.5
-
206.5
7
5.79 121.9 5.80 121.9 5.79 121.9
5.79 121.9 5.79
5.80 121.9 5.82 122.2
8
-
167.3
-
167.1
-
167.0
36.1
38.9
-
166.9
35.9
38.9
-
-
167.0
-
167.7
35.2
39.3
9
2.94 35.9
2.94
-
36.2 2.93
2.93
-
2.93
-
2.94
-
36.2 3.15
10
11α
β
-
39.8
21.7
38.9
21.7
-
38.9
38.9
21.8
-
1.67
1.78
1.87
2.12
-
1.67
1.77
1.85
2.10
-
1.68
1.78
1.84
2.10
-
1.68
1.77
1.85
2.11
-
1.68
1.78
1.83
2.10
-
1.66
1.78
1.85
2.11
-
1.70
1.81
1.86
2.12
-
21.8
32.4
21.7
32.5
21.7
32.3
21.6
32.5
12α
β
32.6
32.4
32.5
13
14
15α
β
49.0
85.3
49.3
85.3
48.8
85.9
48.8
85.3
48.7
85.4
48.8
85.3
48.7
85.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1.97
1.59
1.98
1.72
1.95
1.61
2.03
1.87
2.31
0.82
0.96
-
1.96
1.61
2.03
1.86
1.96
1.61
2.04
1.88
2.32
0.83
0.97
-
1.95
1.61
1.94
1.88
2.35
0.85
0.96
-
1.97
1.62
2.04
1.87
2.32
0.83
0.96
-
1.97
1.61
2.03
1.88
31.8
21.6
31.7
22.5
31.7
22.7
31.7
22.6
31.7
22.7
31.7
22.6
31.8
22.6
16α
β
17
18
19
20
21
22
2.39 50.7
0.88 18.1
0.96 24.1
50.6 2.31
17.8 0.82
24.1 0.96
50.6
17.8
24.2
85.3
22.7
83.4
50.7
17.8
24.2
85.5
231
51.4
17.7
24.1
85.5
23.8
83.8
50.7 2.32
17.8 0.83
24.1 0.96
50.7
17.8
24.6
85.6
23.0
83.1
-
78.0
85.3
-
85.6
-
1.19 21.2
3.33 78.5
1.18
3.68
22.7 1.18
83.4 3.69
1.16
3.71
1.15
3.65
1.16
3.71
23.0 1.16
83.1 3.71
83.1
1.66
27.5
1.27
23
24
1.52
24.8 1.53
24.8
42.3
1.52
24.5
42.3
1.56
24.8
42.3
1.52
24.8 1.53
24.8
42.3
1.78
42.5
1.44
1.73
1.49
-
1.73
42.3
1.72
1.49
-
1.74
1.50
-
1.73
1.50
-
1.74
42.3
1.48
1.50
25
26
-
71.4
71.2
-
71.2
29.1
29.6
111.5
108.1
35.7
9.4
71.2
29.2
71.2
29.0
29.6
111.5
102.5
35.7
9.4
71.2
-
71.2
29.1
29.5
-
1.19 29.1
1.20 29.8
1.20
1.21
-
29.1 1.20
29.6 1.21
1.20
1.21
-
1.20
1.21
-
1.20
1.21
-
29.1 1.20
29.6 1.21
27
29.6
28
-
-
109.6
-
102.7
108.0
-
-
111.7
110.0
25.8
102.8
110.0
21.9
-
-
-
29
R1 1
-
-
-
-
110.0
1.47 28.9
1.38
21.9 1.75
0.99
1.41
1.73
0.99
1.38
-
-
2
R2 1
2
R3 1
R4 1
2
1.61
0.91
1.27
1.63
0.96
39.5
9.1
1.32 26.7
5.09
1.32
1.39
-
1.27
23.6
1.27
5.06
1.30
23.6
-
5.10
-
-
-
-
-
-
27.3 1.32
27.6
29.5
24.2
36.2
9.6
1.27
1.64
0.95
24.2 1.27
36.2 1.65
24.2
36.2
9.6
1.39
29.4
22.1
9.6
0.95

Molecules 2013, 18
15260
Table 3. 1H- and 13C-NMR shifts of compounds 11–14; 31 and 32; in ppm, in methanol-d4.
11
12
13
14
31
32
Atom no.
H
C
H
1.43
1.80
C
H
C
H
1.43
1.80
3.84
3.95
1.72
1.72
2.38
-
C
H
C
H
C
1α
β
1.43
1.80
3.84
3.95
1.72
1.72
2.38
-
1.43
1.79
3.84
3.95
1.72
1.72
2.39
-
1.22
1.97
4.27
4.30
1.97
1.97
2.24
-
1.23
1.99
4.26
4.30
1.98
1.98
2.26
-
37.5
37.5
37.5
37.5
38.8
38.8
2
3
68.8 3.84
68.2 3.95
68.8
68.6
68.8
68.6
68.8
68.6
73.6
73.2
73.6
73.3
4α
β
1.72
1.72
33.0
33.0
32.9
33.0
27.8
27.8
5
6
51.9 2.38
206.5
51.9
51.8
51.9
206.5
52.5
52.5
-
206.5
206.5
205.5
205.7
7
8
9
5.82
-
3.16
-
1.71
1.81
1.88
2.14
-
122.3 5.81 122.3
5.82 122.3
5.80
-
3.16
-
1.70
1.82
1.90
2.17
-
122.3 5.81 121.9 5.83 122.0
167.7
35.3 3.16
39.3
21.6
-
167.6
35.2
39.3
-
167.6
35.2
39.1
167.6
35.2
39.3
-
166.9
35.9
38.9
-
167.0
35.9
39.0
3.15
-
2.95
-
2.94
-
10
11α
β
12α
β
13
14
15α
β
16α
β
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
-
1.70
1.82
1.90
2.17
-
1.67
1.79
1.87
2.14
-
1.67
1.77
1.87
2.13
-
1.67
1.75
1.82
2.11
-
21.6
32.5
21.6
32.2
21.6
32.5
21.7
32.3
21.7
32.4
32.3
48.8
85.3
48.7
85.4
48.5
85.3
48.5
85.4
48.7
85.2
48.8
85.4
-
-
-
-
-
-
2.00
1.66
2.07
1.99
2.44
0.89
0.96
-
1.31
3.85
1.65
1.78
1.54
-
1.94
1.60
2.06
1.88
1.98
1.65
2.07
1.98
2.44
0.87
0.95
-
1.30
3.85
1.64
1.78
1.54
-
1.92
1.59
2.03
1.85
2.44
0.86
0.96
-
1.33
3.78
1.59
1.78
1.50
-
1.99
1.65
2.07
2.00
2.45
0.89
0.96
-
1.29
3.88
1.65
1.75
1.55
-
2.03
1.67
2.18
1.95
2.36
0.96
0.98
-
0.90
3.86
1.53
1.85
1.52
-
31.9
22.9
31.7
22.1
31.9
22.9
31.7
22.0
31.8
22.9
31.8
22.5
51.7 2.45
17.8 0.88
24.6 0.96
51.0
17.9
24.5
86.7
19.7
84.3
25.6
51.6
17.8
24.6
85.8
23.8
86.2
24.8
50.9
17.9
24.5
86.8
19.6
84.3
25.6
51.6
17.8
24.2
86.0
23.7
86.3
24.8
50.7
17.9
24.1
86.5
21.9
84.1
25.1
85.7
23.7 1.33
86.2 379
-
24.8 1.58
1.79
1.51
24
42.3
42.4
42.2
42.4
42.2
42.3
25
26
27
28
29
R1 1
R2 1
R3 1
2
71.2
29.1 1.21
29.6 1.22
-
71.2
29.1
29.6
-
102.8
-
71.2
29.1
29.6
-
71.2
29.1
29.6
-
102.6
-
71.2
29.1
29.6
109.5
105.7
29.0
71.3
29.2
29.6
109.6
108.5
28.9
1.20
1.21
-
-
-
1.20
1.21
-
1.20
1.21
-
-
-
1.21
1.22
-
1.21
1.22
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
105.3
-
-
-
-
105.0
-
-
-
1.47
1.32
1.47
1.32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
26.8
26.7
133.4
134.3
128.8
7.00 111.1
7.36
6.99
-
6.99
7.36
3
4
5
6
5.73
-
-
149.1
148.6
5.75
-
115.8 5.80
160.7
-
1.53
30.0
-
-
6.79 116.0
6.89 120.4
115.8
128.8
R4 1
2
-
131.7
111.6
148.6
n.d.
132.7
-
140.4
-
148.0
7.03
-
-
6.78
6.93
7.38 129.4
6.98 115.7
7.47 128.0 7.47 125.9
7.36 129.3 7.28 128.8
7.36 130.1 7.22 1283
7.36 129.3 7.28 128.8
7.47 128.0 7.47 125.9
3
4
5
6
5.92
-
5.94
-
-
160.8
115.9
121.5
6.98 115.7
7.38 129.4

Molecules 2013, 18
15261
As published before [9], the 20,22-diol moiety of 20E is more reactive than the 2,3-diol, probably
due to the free rotation of the 20,22-bond of 20E that allows the 20,22-dioxolane ring to form with less
strain. This allowed us to selectively obtain the 20,22-mono-dioxolane derivatives 2–14, or, depending
on the amount of reagent and the reaction time, the 2,3;20,22-bis-homo-dioxolanes 17 and 21–25. By
utilizing the 20,22-monodioxolane ecdysteroids, another aldehyde or ketone could be coupled to
position 2,3, resulting in several bis-hetero-dioxolane derivatives 26–33. For this, however, gradually
decreasing reactivity with the increase of the size of the reagent was a limiting factor: larger aldehydes
or ketones (mainly those containing a substituted aromatic ring) could not be coupled at the
2,3-position. The 2,3-monodioxolane derivatives also appeared to be present as minor side-products of
the reactions, and as a consequence of their low amount, only one such compound (compound 15) was
isolated and studied. To selectively obtain this kind of a compound (16) in a more reasonable yield,
another, three-step approach was successfully applied: after protecting the 20,22-diol with
phenylboronic acid, the 2,3-acetonide could be prepared, and removal of the 20,22 protecting group
afforded the desired 2,3-monoacetonide in a one-pot procedure.
In the case of the reactions with aldehydes or asymmetric ketones, the new C-28 and C-29 central
atoms of the dioxolane rings are stereogenic centers and thus two possible diastereomers can be formed at
both diols. Their configuration was elucidated by two-dimensional ROESY or selective one-dimensional
ROESY experiments, e.g., in the doubly substituted dioxolane derivative 22 (R1 = R4 = n-Bu, R2 = R3 = H)
1
13
the unambiguous differentiation of the H and C signals of the two n-butyl groups was achieved in
the following way (see Figure 2). Assignment of the H-C(28) atoms (δ = 4.93/105.9 ppm) was supported
by the H-2/C-28 and H-3/C-28 HMBC correlations, and that of H-C(29) (δ = 4.91/105.6 ppm) by the
H-22/C-29 cross peak, respectively. The selective ROESY experiment irradiating at 4.93 ppm showed
contacts with the Hα-2 and Hα-3 atoms proving the α position of the R2 = H atom. The ROESY
response obtained irradiating H = R3 signal (δ = 4.91) on H-22 (δ = 3.64 ppm) revealed their
cis arrangement and the R configuration around C-29. The unambiguous assignments of the signals
of the two n-butyl groups R1 and R4 were achieved by selective TOCSY experiments (irradiation at
δ = 4.93 and 4.91, respectively).
Figure 2. Stereostructure of 22. Red arrows indicate the detected ROESY steric
1
proximities, the blue numbers give the characteristic H, and the black numbers the 13C
chemical shifts.
1.57
CH2
1.38 1.38 0.92
CH2 CH2 CH3
4.91
H
0.86 1.14
O
CH3
105.4
H3C
0.97
CH3
H
O
H
H
H
85.5
H
H
3.64
H
H
H
1.94
H
H
H
2.36
H
H
1.41 1.67
CH2 CH2
OH
0.93 1.39
CH3 CH3
1.90
72.8
O
4.21
H
5.80
105.7
H
O
CH3
1.20
CH3
1.21
75.1
H
OH
O
H
H
H
4.93
4.11

Molecules 2013, 18
15262
In case of the C-28-epimers, typically an approximately 1:1 yield was obtained, and a good
separation was achieved by simple chromatographic methods (see below). On the other hand, possibly
due to steric reasons, the longer chain of the reagent was highly selective in taking the α-position in the
20,22-dioxolane moiety. This selectivity was, however, decreased in cases when larger moieties, such
as substituted aromatic rings were present in the reagent, resulting in the appearance of the other
epimers as well. These epimer pairs (compounds 11-12 and 13-14) required high-performance liquid
chromatography (HPLC) for their successful separation. Compound 10 was isolated by HPLC as a
minor product from the preparation of 9; this compound, considering the vicinal coupling constant of
the olefinic hydrogen atoms (J = 11.8 Hz) contains a Z double bond, and most likely originated from
an impurity in the trans-cinnamic aldehyde reagent used. Compounds 18 and 19 were the only cases
where one of the dioxolane rings was formed with the elimination of ethanol instead of water, losing
an ethyl group from the reagent methyl ethyl ketone.
2.2. Anti-Proliferative Effect of Ecdysteroid Derivatives on PAR and MDR Mouse Lymphoma Cells
The anti-proliferative activity of the derivatives was determined after 72 h of incubation of each of
the cell lines with serial dilutions of the compounds. Inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were calculated
and are presented in Table 4. As seen from the table, several compounds exert much lower
anti-proliferative activity on the MDR cell line as compared to the parental one, while other
compounds show similar activities on both cell lines.
2.3. Inhibition of the ABCB1 Pump of MDR Mouse Lymphoma Cells (Rhodamine 123 Accumulation Assay)
Accumulation of rhodamine 123 by MDR mouse lymphoma cells was evaluated by flow cytometry
in the presence of the newly described compounds in order to study their capacity to inhibit the
ABCB1 pump and therefore prevent the efflux of the dye, which was consequentially retained inside
the MDR cell. Parental mouse lymphoma cells were used as control for dye retention inside the cell
while MDR cells alone do not retain rhodamine 123 at the concentration employed. The efflux pump
inhibitor (EPI) verapamil was used as positive control. All the compounds were dissolved in DMSO,
which was also evaluated for any effect on the retention of the fluorochrome. DMSO concentration in
the assay was 0.2%. For each compound, the fluorescence activity ratio (FAR), which measures the
amount of rhodamine 123 accumulated by the cell in presence of the compound was calculated
as follows:
FAR = (FLMDRtreated/FLMDRuntreated)/(FLPARtreated/FLPARuntreated
)
(1)
where FL is the mean of the fluorescence. The obtained results are shown by Table 4.
As seen from the table, the compounds showed marked differences according to their capacity to
inhibit the efflux of rhodamine 123 in this bioassay: from the practically inactive (compounds 5, 7, 9,
10, 12 and 20) to the very strong (compounds 6, 8, 14 and 25), various activities were observed. Most
interestingly, these results did not always conform to those obtained from the combination studies, for
example, no significant differences can be observed between the combination indices of compounds 20
and 25, and compound 3, very weak in this assay, was able to act in a rather significant synergism with

Molecules 2013, 18
15263
doxorubicin (see below). These observation seem to support our initial theory, that these compounds are
not or not exclusively acting as EPIs, but other mechanisms may also be involved in their activity [7].
Table 4. IC50 values of the ecdysteroid derivatives and fluorescence activity ratio (FAR)
values determined in presence of 2 and 20 μM of compound. IC50—inhibitory concentration
(concentration of compound that inhibits 50% of cell growth); IC50 values are presented
as the average of 3 independent experiments ± the standard error of the mean (SEM);
*—the compound showed cytotoxicity at this concentration and it was not possible to
calculate the FAR value; FAR values of the positive control verapamil (20.4 μM) and the
negative control DMSO (0.2%) were 5.73 and 0.72, respectively.
IC50 (µM)
FAR
20 µM
Compound
PAR
MDR
>150
2 µM
1.70
1.02
2.40
1.42
1.53
1.04
1.21
0.77
0.76
0.87
0.87
1.11
1.00
43.43
0.79
29.96
6.47
20E
3
>150
1.76 [7]
4.04
40.76
1.40
98.74
1.69
94.56
1.01
0.91
7.85
0.87
*
40.6 ± 3.6
21.4 ± 1.4
77.0 ± 1.5
18.5 ± 1.8
50.0 ± 3.4
34.1 ± 3.3
36.7 ± 0.8
45.0 ± 9.6
92.3 ± 23.1
~98.9
>150
4
57.8 ± 5.7
92.7 ± 2.0
35.7 ± 0.5
>150
5
6
7
8
38.8 ± 0.4
89.4 ± 14.4
>150
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
>150
>150
31.6 ± 5.3
41.0 ± 6.8
98.0 ± 1.1
43.2 ± 2.7
59.5 ± 5.8
87.1 ± 9.3
109.40
14.23
3.68
45.35
53.49
55.81
1.04
*
75.13 ± 0.7 85.8 ± 10.6
51.2 ± 1.5
99.6 ± 5.2
52.6 ± 1.5
68.9 ± 2.1
19.5 ± 2.6
19.9 ± 0.03
52.6 ± 12.9
20.3 ± 0.8
30.2 ± 1.2
>150
56.0 ± 6.4
>150
87.8 ± 10.9 10.00
>150
0.95
30.6 ± 1.4
43.81
25.5 ± 3.4 114.64
*
49.7 ± 3.9
22.4 ± 0.8
38.3 ± 1.1
>150
14.71
51.97
1.08
*
*
82.68
14.07
17.67
60.67
68.46
75.17
67.78
*
3.88
>150
>150
1.41
75.2 ± 12.1 64.4 ± 13.7
1.68
77.5 ± 20.7
72.2 ± 9.8
42.0 ± 18.9
41.6 ± 6.7
62.6 ± 16.8
75.9 ± 3.1
66.8 ± 4.7
42.7 ± 2.6
46.5 ± 7.0
64.7 ± 7.3
2.21
51.67
10.98
61.67
3.47
63.22

Molecules 2013, 18
15264
2.4. Combination Studies: Effect of Ecdysteroid Derivatives on the Activity of Doxorubicin on MDR
Mouse Lymphoma Cells
Effect of the newly synthesized derivatives was evaluated on checkerboard 96-well plates with
different concentrations of doxorubicin and compound after 48 h of incubation of the cells, similarly to
our previous approach [7]. Combination indices for the different constant ratios of compound vs.
doxorubicin were determined by using the CompuSyn software to plot four to five data points to each
ratio. CI values were calculated by means of the median-effect equation [10], where CI < 1, CI = 1,
and CI > 1 represent synergism, additive effect (i.e., no interaction), and antagonism, respectively. The
CI values are presented on Table 5. Combination index plots (or Fa-CI plots, where Fa is the fraction
affected) were also generated for each compound using serial deletion analysis in order to determine
variability of the data [10]. An example of Fa-CI plot is given by Figure 3 for compounds 1, 5 and 15.
Table 5. Combination index (CI) values at different drug ratios (compound vs.
doxorubicin, respectively) at 50, 75 and 90% of growth inhibition (ED50, ED75 and ED90,
respectively); CIavg—weighted average CI value; CIavg = (CI50 + 2CI75 + 3CI90)/6. CI < 1,
CI = 1, and CI > 1 represent synergism, additivity, and antagonism, respectively. Dm, m,
and r represent antilog of the x-intercept, slope, and linear correlation coefficient of the
median-effect plot, respectively.
CI Values at
Compound
Drug Ratio
Dm
m
r
CIavg
ED50
2.00
1.86
1.80
0.28
0.26
0.39
0.84
1.22
1.11
0.87
0.76
0.91
0.61
0.56
1.08
0.64
0.50
0.61
0.57
0.99
0.70
ED75
2.02
1.97
1.93
0.14
0.14
0.22
0.54
0.86
0.77
0.43
0.31
0.31
0.56
0.58
0.91
0.43
0.26
0.44
0.52
0.59
0.44
ED90
2.04
2.10
2.08
0.07
0.08
0.12
0.35
0.61
0.54
0.22
0.13
0.11
0.80
0.78
0.88
0.29
0.14
0.33
0.50
0.36
0.28
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.5:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.5:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.5:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
35.52
54.05
76.90
11.68
14.73
26.60
20.51
48.83
64.94
35.28
45.44
71.98
15.50
18.06
40.46
23.22
29.50
52.58
6.38
2.855
2.487
2.376
3.246
3.167
3.859
1.933
1.766
1.920
2.44
0.997
0.978
0.978
0.964
0.996
0.970
0.955
0.947
0.916
0.985
0.962
0.989
0.907
0.870
0.921
0.986
0.959
0.989
0.992
0.981
0.936
2.03
2.02
1.99
0.13
0.13
0.20
0.49
0.79
0.71
0.40
0.29
0.31
0.69
0.68
0.92
0.39
0.24
0.41
0.52
0.54
0.40
20E [7]
1 [7]
2 [7]
3
4
5
6
3.54
5.78
1.69
1.95
5.02
1.56
2.25
1.32
1.15
13.92
11.21
2.38
2.34

Molecules 2013, 18
15265
Table 5. Cont.
CI Values at
Compound
7
Drug Ratio
Dm
m
r
CIavg
ED50
0.80
0.84
1.16
0.63
0.84
0.76
1.32
0.89
0.82
1.12
0.92
1.24
0.95
1.04
0.89
1.13
0.86
1.32
0.66
0.87
0.85
0.20
0.26
0.28
0.33
0.27
0.20
0.64
0.67
0.34
0.31
0.37
0.54
0.23
0.27
0.40
0.31
0.36
0.52
ED75
0.86
0.81
0.96
0.47
0.64
0.68
0.92
0.66
0.68
0.84
0.81
0.98
0.53
0.71
0.65
0.80
0.48
0.53
0.61
0.74
0.93
0.25
0.30
0.34
0.12
0.10
0.06
0.53
0.35
0.24
0.25
0.35
0.56
0.16
0.23
0.37
0.22
0.31
0.46
ED90
1.20
0.91
0.86
0.61
0.69
0.74
1.17
0.76
0.74
0.91
0.94
0.92
0.34
0.56
0.55
0.57
0.27
0.21
0.70
0.73
1.12
0.33
0.35
0.42
0.05
0.04
0.02
0.44
0.19
0.17
0.24
0.36
0.60
0.15
0.24
0.39
0.17
0.27
0.42
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
31.47
40.24
62.14
10.85
20.03
22.38
25.01
25.78
32.71
26.31
31.74
55.74
23.61
44.10
59.01
19.20
26.10
66.47
12.53
21.71
25.07
6.21
1.04
1.36
1.96
2.04
3.68
3.99
1.46
2.04
2.66
1.84
2.01
4.10
2.03
1.76
1.95
1.09
1.44
2.79
1.75
2.79
2.02
1.70
2.43
2.33
2.25
2.61
4.12
1.31
3.09
1.92
3.21
2.96
2.85
2.66
2.48
2.61
3.67
2.77
2.81
0.945
0.967
0.996
0.820
0.990
0.949
0.988
0.968
0.950
0.980
0.991
0.988
0.945
0.990
0.997
0.982
0.958
0.997
0.954
0.961
0.898
0.946
0.992
0.979
0.971
1.000
0.969
0.993
0.989
0.967
0.999
0.996
0.987
0.956
0.984
0.998
0.978
0.970
0.977
1.02
0.87
0.94
0.57
0.70
0.72
1.11
0.75
0.73
0.92
0.89
0.99
0.51
0.69
0.64
0.74
0.44
0.50
0.66
0.76
1.01
0.28
0.32
0.37
0.12
0.10
0.07
0.50
0.33
0.22
0.25
0.36
0.58
0.16
0.24
0.39
0.21
0.30
0.45
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
10.74
13.24
16.86
24.03
26.98
13.16
23.63
18.98
5.14
7.80
12.84
6.32
10.03
17.83
6.48
9.15
14.59

Molecules 2013, 18
15266
Table 5. Cont.
CI Values at
Compound
20
Drug Ratio
Dm
m
r
CIavg
ED50
0.92
0.72
1.06
0.44
0.43
0.58
0.39
0.52
0.71
0.22
0.26
0.28
0.70
0.79
0.56
0.54
0.95
1.01
0.31
0.37
0.56
0.34
0.31
0.38
0.21
0.20
0.20
0.20
0.19
0.22
0.23
0.21
0.21
0.12
0.13
0.22
0.18
0.16
0.23
0.15
0.14
0.19
ED75
0.59
0.58
0.65
0.32
0.40
0.61
0.38
0.50
0.65
0.29
0.30
0.34
0.69
0.82
0.88
0.40
0.64
0.72
0.18
0.25
0.42
0.18
0.22
0.32
0.12
0.13
0.14
0.13
0.14
0.21
0.08
0.10
0.14
0.10
0.15
0.23
0.12
0.16
0.24
0.13
0.15
0.27
ED90
0.41
0.50
0.42
0.27
0.40
0.67
0.39
0.49
0.60
0.42
0.35
0.42
0.74
0.88
1.42
0.31
0.43
0.52
0.13
0.20
0.36
0.15
0.21
0.33
0.07
0.09
0.10
0.10
0.12
0.22
0.06
0.07
0.13
0.12
0.21
0.29
0.12
0.20
0.29
0.14
0.22
0.44
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
20.4:1
40.8:1
81.6:1
19.96
23.55
46.17
6.72
7.82
11.75
6.55
9.80
14.25
6.84
10.74
13.24
5.87
7.25
5.30
4.22
7.74
8.37
6.14
10.51
20.13
5.39
7.32
12.04
6.01
9.21
12.73
6.07
8.23
12.36
4.71
6.98
9.92
2.86
4.43
8.97
4.40
5.22
9.18
4.12
5.14
9.18
2.41
1.86
4.64
4.53
2.88
2.46
2.41
2.85
3.64
1.54
2.43
2.33
1.98
2.02
1.17
2.18
2.99
2.62
4.16
4.37
4.72
3.20
2.73
2.85
3.34
3.03
3.14
3.31
3.39
2.46
2.20
2.32
1.86
1.83
1.66
2.26
2.66
1.80
2.15
1.85
1.52
1.36
0.968
0.984
0.970
1.000
0.944
0.963
0.979
0.992
0.980
0.998
0.992
0.979
0.998
0.989
0.942
0.947
0.995
0.985
0.962
0.991
0.992
0.956
0.981
0.969
0.956
0.991
0.973
0.958
0.963
0.981
0.984
0.994
0.995
0.963
0.969
0.998
0.999
0.990
0.971
0.999
0.982
0.992
0.55
0.56
0.60
0.31
0.40
0.63
0.39
0.50
0.63
0.34
0.32
0.37
0.71
0.85
1.10
0.38
0.59
0.67
0.18
0.25
0.41
0.19
0.23
0.33
0.11
0.12
0.13
0.13
0.14
0.22
0.09
0.11
0.15
0.11
0.17
0.26
0.13
0.18
0.26
0.14
0.18
0.34
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33

Molecules 2013, 18
15267
Figure 3. Fraction affected (Fa) vs. combination index (CI) value plot for compounds 5
and 15, in comparison with the original lead compound 1. Error bars represent 95%
confidence intervals by means of serial deletion analysis performed with the CompuSyn
software. The 2,3-mono-dioxolane derivative 15 represents significantly stronger synergism
with doxorubicin than the corresponding 20,22-dioxolane derivative 5 at practically all
activity levels, and above Fa = 0.7 (which, in case of cancer, matters the most [10]) it is
also stronger than compound 1.
5
15
1
As seen from Table 5, all compounds acted synergistically with doxorubicin and their behavior
followed our previous observation, namely that in case of all ecdysteroids there seems to be an “ideal”
compound vs. doxorubicin ratio where the strongest synergistic effect occurs. Based on the variability
of the mono-, homo-di- and hetero-di-substituted compounds, as well as that of the coupled
substituents at R1–R4, several novel structure-activity relationships (SARs) were observed. According
to this, we followed our previous approach [7]—for each compound, the strongest activity by means of
the weighted average CI values was primarily considered for comparison, regardless of the compound
vs. doxorubicin ratio where this activity was found.
First of all, as a surprising outcome of our experiments, the 2,3-dioxolane moiety is far more
important for a strong activity, than the one at positions 20,22. In fact, compound 15, monosubstituted
at position 2,3, was the only ecdysteroid derivative in the present investigation that was able to exert a
stronger activity at its best ratio than our original lead, the diacetonide compound 1 (Figure 3). A very
interesting SAR was revealed by comparing the activity of the C-28 and C-29 epimer pairs: at C-28,
the larger substituent needs to take the α‐position (24 vs. 25), while at C-29 the β-position for a
stronger activity (cf. 11 vs. 12 and 13 vs. 14). As concerns the 20,22-monodioxolanes, increasing the
length of the side chains coupled to C-29 lead to a significant increase in the synergistic activity with
doxorubicin till the length of three carbon atoms (compound 3), however a longer alkyl substituent

Molecules 2013, 18
15268
(compound 4) appeared to be less preferable. Introducing larger aromatic groups did not lead to a
breakthrough, although further substituents on the aromatic ring (compounds 11, 13) were able to increase
activity as compared to the case when a non-substituted phenyl group was present (compound 7).
Addition of a β-methyl group to C-29 could, however, significantly improve the activity as
compared to that of the 29α-phenyl substituted derivative (cf. 8 vs. 7, respectively). The observed
structure-activity relationships are summarized in Figure 4.
Figure 4. SAR summary for compounds 1–33. “Greater than” symbols denote stronger
synergistic activities, i.e., lower weighted average CI values when applied together
with doxorubicin.
diethyl > dimethyl
R4
R3
n-Pr > n-Bu > Ph
Et > Me > H
If asymmetric, β-position of larger
29
O
substituent preferred
O
22
20
If asymmetric, α-position of
larger substituent preferred
H
OH
R1
O
2
28
3
O
H
O
OH
R2
diethyl >> dimethyl
Dioxolane substitution at:
2,3;20,22 ~ 2,3 > 20,22
H
3. Experimental
3.1. General Information
The starting material 20E (90%, originated from the roots of Cyanotis arachnoidea) was purchased
from Shaanxi KingSci Biotechnology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and further purified by crystallization
from ethyl acetate–methanol (2:1, v/v), so that purity of 20E utilized for the semi-syntheses was 97.8%,
by means of HPLC-DAD, maximum absorbance within the range of 220–400 nm. Mono- and
disubstituted ecdysteroid dioxolanes were synthesized as published before [9]. Briefly, the starting
compound was reacted with the aldehyde or ketone to be coupled to positions 20,22 and/or 2,3 in the
presence of phosphomolybdic acid (Lach-Ner, Neratovice, Czech Republic) at room temperature for
5–60 min depending on the target compound. The reaction was terminated by neutralizing the pH with
a 5% aqueous solution of NaHCO3 (Merck, Munich, Germany), methanol was evaporated until only
water was present, and the product(s) were extracted with methylene chloride. Column
chromatography (CC), rotational planar chromatography (RPC) and/or crystallization was used for
purification, as detailed below. Solvent system compositions are given in v/v%. For RPC, a
Chromatotron device (Harrison Research, Palo Alto, CA, USA) was used. The separation was
monitored with thin layer chromatography (TLC) on silica gel 60 F254 (0.25 μm, Merck). HPLC

Molecules 2013, 18
15269
purification of compounds 9–14 was performed on a gradient system of two Jasco PU2080 pumps
connected to a Jasco MD-2010 Plus photodiode-array detector, on a Zorbax XDB-C8 column (5 µm,
9.6 × 250 mm) at a flow rate of 3 mL/min. Mass spectra were recorded on an API 2000 triple
quadrupole tandem mass spectrometer (AB SCIEX, Foster City, CA, USA) in positive mode with
atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) ion source except for compound 29 which was
1
13
measured with electron-spray ionization (ESI). H- (500.1 MHz) and C- (125.6 MHz) NMR spectra
were recorded at room temperature on an Avance 500 spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA). For
the examples of compounds 3, 5, 7, 8, 15, 21, 23–25, 28 and 29, structure elucidation of ecdysteroid
dioxolanes by comprehensive one- and two-dimensional NMR methods has recently been discussed in
detail elsewhere, including experimental details for the aforementioned compounds [9]. Regarding the
new compounds, amounts of approximately 1–10 mg were dissolved in 0.1 mL of methanol-d4 and
transferred to a 2.5 mm Bruker MATCH NMR sample tube. Chemical shifts are given on the δ-scale
and are referenced to the solvent (MeOH-d4: δC = 49.1 and δH = 3.31 ppm). Pulse programs of all
experiments (1H, 13C, DEPTQ, DEPT-135, sel-TOCSY, sel-ROE, sel-NOE, gradient-selected (gs)
1H,1H-COSY, edited gs-HSQC, gs-HMBC, ROESY) were taken from the Bruker software library.
1
Most H assignments were accomplished using general knowledge of chemical shift dispersion with
the aid of the proton-proton coupling pattern (1H-NMR spectra).
3.2. Semi-Synthesis and Purification of Monosubstituted Ecdysteroid Dioxolane Derivatives 2–16
20E was dissolved in methanol (10 mL, Merck) to a final concentration of 100 mM or 25 mM in
case of compounds 9, 10, 13, 14, and the corresponding reagent (3: butyraldehyde, 4: valeraldehyde,
5: 3-pentanone, 6: methyl isobutyl ketone, 10 equivalents each; 7: benzaldehyde, 5 g; 8: acetophenone,
6 g; 9, 10: cinnamaldehyde, 11, 12: vanillin, 13, 14: 4-benzyloxybenzaldehyde, 10 equivalents each;
15: 3-pentanone, 100 equivalents; compound 15 was obtained as a side-product from the synthesis of
25, see below) was added to the solution. Phosphomolybdic acid (1.00 g) was added (except in the case
of the synthesis of 9 and 10, when 0.50 g were added) and the mixture was stirred at room temperature
for 10 min (except for 7: 5 min, 8: 60 min, 15: 30 min). In the case of compound 16, 20E was
dissolved in methanol (10 mL) to a final concentration of 100 mM, and after adding phenylboronic
acid (1 equivalent), the mixture was stirred for 30 min. Acetone (500 equivalents) and phoshomolybdic
acid (0.5 g) were added to the mixture, and after 1 h stirring a solution of NaOH and H2O2 was added
in order to remove the phenylboronate group. Then, the reaction was worked up as described above.
Compounds 3, 4, 7, 8, a mixture of 9-10, and compounds 15 and 16 were obtained from RPC on silica
gel with appropriate solvent systems of ethyl acetate-ethanol-water (3, 4) or cyclohexane-ethyl acetate
(7, 8, 9-10, 15, 16). The purification of compounds 11-12 and 13-14 started with CC by using solvent
systems of ethyl acetate-ethanol-water. Isomer pairs 9-10, 11-12 and 13-14 were isolated by RP-HPLC
(9, 10: 75% CH3OH aq., 3 mL/min; 11, 12: 70% CH3OH aq., 3 mL/min; 13, 14: 80% CH3OH aq.,
3 mL/min). Compounds 2, 5 and 6 were recrystallized from acetonitrile without chromatographic
purification. The yields were: 2 (236.6 mg, 45.43%), 3 (116.2 mg, 21.7%), 4 (142.8 mg, 26.0%),
5 (183.5 mg, 33.4%), 6 (71.9 mg, 25.2%), 7 (292.5 mg, 51.4%), 8 (196.8 mg, 33.8%), 9 (27.0 mg,
18.5%), 10 (13.9 mg, 9.4%), 11 (156.3 mg, 25.4%), 12 (67.0 mg, 10.9%), 13 (67.3 mg, 39.9%),
14 (33.7 mg, 20.0%), 15 (27.4 mg, 5.0%), 16 (13.3 mg, 10.2%).

Molecules 2013, 18
15270
3.3. Semi-Synthesis and Purification of Disubstituted Ecdysteroid Derivatives 17–25 in One-Step
20E (17–20: 200 mg; 21–25: 480 mg) was dissolved in methyl-ethyl ketone (20 mL, compounds 17–20)
or methanol (10 mL) and the reagent was added to the solution (21: butyraldehyde, 100 equivalents,
22: valeraldehyde, 100 equivalents, 23: 3-pentanone, 100 equivalents, 24, 25: benzaldehyde, 5 g).
Phosphomolybdic acid was added (17–20: 20 mg; 21–25: 0.50 g), and the mixture was stirred at room
temperature for 5 (17–20, 24–25) or 30 (21–23) min. The reactions were worked up as described
above, and the products were isolated by RPC using the appropriate n-hexane-acetone (17–20)
or cyclohexane-ethyl acetate-ethanol (21–25) solvent systems. As a side-product of the reaction of
20E with methyl-ethyl ketone, 20 was obtained as a 20,22-monodioxolane derivative. The yields were:
17 (15.5 mg, 6.3%), 18 (4.9 mg, 2.1%), 19 (8.4 mg, 3.6%), 20 (4.46 mg, 2.0%) 21 (242.4 mg, 41.2%),
22 (134.5 mg, 21.8%), 23 (42.3 mg, 6.9%), 24 (36.1 mg, 5.5%), 25 (43.8 mg, 6.7%).
3.4. Semi-Synthesis and Purification of Disubstituted Ecdysteroid Derivatives 26–33 in Two-Steps
Previously obtained 20,22-monosubstituted compounds (2, 20.7 mg; 3, 40.0 mg; 5, 40.7 mg; 6, 50.0 mg;
7, 57.0 mg; 8, 87.3 mg; 2, 104.0 mg) were dissolved in methyl ethyl ketone (2 mL, 26 and 27) or in
methanol (5 mL) and the reagent (28–32: acetone, 500 equivalents; 33: butyraldehyde, 500 equivalents)
was added to the solution. Phosphomolybdic acid (26, 27: 20 mg; 28–32: 0.5 g) was added to the
solution, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 (26, 27) or 60 (28–33) min.
The reactions were terminated and the products were purified as described above for the disubstituted
derivatives. The yields were: 26 (5.1 mg, 23.1%), 27 (5.1 mg, 23.1%), 28 (10.9 mg, 25.4%), 29 (15.8 mg,
36.2%), 30 (15.5 mg, 28.9%), 31 (24.8 mg, 40.6%), 32 (38.7 mg, 41.5%), 33 (53.0 mg, 46.2%).
3.5. Further Experimental Data for the New Compounds
29α-Butyl-20,22-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (4): white needle-like crystals; mp 197–199 °C;
1
for H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 1; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 549 [M+H]+, 531 [M+H-H2O]+,
445, 427, 409.
29α-I-butyl-29β-methyl-20,22-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (6): white needle-like crystals;
1
mp 198–199 °C; for H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 1; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 563 [M+H]+,
545 [M+H-H2O]+, 445, 427, 409.
29α-E-ethenylbenzyl-20,22-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (9): white solid; mp. 161–163 °C;
for 1H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 1, in addition to this, the vicinal coupling constant of the olefinic
hydrogen atoms (J = 16.0 Hz) proved the E configuration of the double bond; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %):
595 [M+H]+, 577 [M+H-H2O]+, 445, 427, 409.
29α-Z-ethenylbenzyl-20,22-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (10): white solid; mp 138–140 °C;
for 1H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 1; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 595 [M+H]+, 577 [M+H-H2O]+, 445,
427, 409.

Molecules 2013, 18
15271
29α-(3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl)-20,22-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (11): white solid;
1
mp 163–165 °C; for H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 3; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 615 [M+H]+,
597 [M+H-H2O]+, 445, 427, 409.
29β-(3-Methoxy-4-hydroxyphenyl)-20,22-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (12): white solid;
1
mp 157–159 °C; for H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 3; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 615 [M+H]+,
597 [M+H-H2O]+, 445, 427, 409.
29α-(4-Benzyloxyphenyl)-20,22-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (13): white solid; mp 144–146 °C;
for 1H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 3; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 675 [M+H]+, 445, 427, 409.
29β-(4-Benzyloxyphenyl)-20,22-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (14): white solid; mp 139–141 °C;
for 1H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 3; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 675 [M+H]+, 445, 427, 409.
1
20-Hydroxyecdysone 2,3-acetonide (16): white solid; mp 124–126 °C; for H- and 13C-NMR data,
see Table 2; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 553 [M+H+MeOH]+, 535, 503, 485, 467, 409.
28α,29α-Diethyl-28β,29β-dimethyl-2,3;20,22-bis-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (17): white solid;
1
mp 98–100 °C; for H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 2; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 589 [M+H]+,
571 [M+H-H2O]+, 499, 481, 409.
28α,29α-Dimethyl-28β-ethyl-2,3;20,22-bis-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (18): white solid;
1
mp 99–101 °C; for H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 2; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 561 [M+H]+,
543 [M+H-H2O]+, 499, 481, 409.
28β,29β-Dimethyl-29α-ethyl-2,3;20,22-bis-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (19): white solid;
1
mp 79–81 °C; for H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 2; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 561 [M+H]+,
543 [M+H-H2O]+, 471, 453, 409.
29α-Ethyl-29β-methyl-20,22-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (20): white solid; mp 140–142 °C;
for 1H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 2; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 535 [M+H]+, 517 [M+H-H2O]+, 445,
427, 409.
28β,29α-Dibutyl-2,3;20,22-bis-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone
(22):
transparent
crystals;
1
mp 186–187 °C; for H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 1; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 617 [M+H]+,
599 [M+H-H2O]+, 513, 495, 409.
28β,29,29-Trimethyl-2,3;20,22-bis-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (26): white solid; mp 100–102 °C;
for 1H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 2; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 547 [M+H]+, 517, 499, 467, 409.
28α,29,29-Trimethyl-28β-ethyl-2,3;20,22-bis-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (27) white solid;
1
mp 360–362 °C; for H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 2; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 575 [M+H]+,
557 [M+H-H2O]+, 499, 481, 409.

Molecules 2013, 18
15272
28,28,29β-Trimethyl-29α-i-buthyl-2,3;20,22-bis-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone
(30):
1
13
transparent solid; mp 114–115 °C; for H- and C-NMR data, see Table 1; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %):
603 [M+H]+, 585 [M+H-H2O]+, 485, 467, 409.
28,28-Dimethyl-29α-phenyl-2,3;20,22-bis-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (31): white solid;
mp 114–117 °C; for 1H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 3; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %):
641 [M+H+MeOH]+, 623, 517, 485, 467, 409.
28,28,29β-Trimethyl-29α-phenyl-2,3;20,22-bis-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (32): white solid;
1
mp 126–128 °C; for H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 3; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 623 [M+H]+,
605 [M+H-H2O]+, 485, 467, 409.
28β-Propyl-29,29-dimethyl-2,3;20,22-bis-O-methylidene-20-hydroxyecdysone (33): transparent solid;
1
mp 109–111 °C; for H- and 13C-NMR data, see Table 1; APCI-MS, m/z (Irel, %): 575 [M+H]+,
557 [M+H-H2O]+, 499, 481.
3.6. Preparation of the Compounds for the Bioassays
Each compound was dissolved in 99.5% DMSO (Sigma, Munich, Germany). In each protocol
DMSO was always tested as solvent control and no activity was observed.
3.7. Cell Lines
Two mouse lymphoma cell lines were used in this work: a parental (PAR) cell line, L5178 mouse
T-cell lymphoma cells (ECACC catalog no. 87111908, U.S. FDA, Silver Spring, MD, USA); and a
multi-drug resistant (MDR) cell line derived from PAR by transfection with pHa MDR1/A retrovirus [11].
MDR cell line was selected by culturing the infected cells with 60 μg/L colchicine. Both cell lines
were cultured in McCoy’s 5A medium supplemented with 10% heat inactivated horse serum,
L-glutamine, and antibiotics (penicillin and streptomycin) at 37 °C and 5% CO2 atmosphere [12].
Medium, horse serum, and antibiotics were purchased from Difco (Detroit, MI, USA).
3.8. Anti-proliferative Assay
Anti-proliferative activities on PAR and MDR cell lines were performed as described before [7].
Briefly, 6 × 103 cells/well were incubated with serial dilutions of each compound (n = 3) in McCoy’s
5 A medium for 72 h at 37 °C, 5% CO2. Then, MTT (Sigma) [13] was added to each well at a final
concentration of 0.5 mg/mL per well) and after 4 h of incubation, 100 µL of SDS 10% (Sigma) in
0.01 M HCl was added to each well. Plates were further incubated overnight and optical density at 540
and 630 nm using an ELISA reader (Multiskan EX, Thermo Labsystem, Milford, MA, USA).
Fifty percent inhibitory concentrations (IC50) were calculated using non-linear regression curve
fitting of log(inhibitor) vs. response and variable slope with a least squares (ordinary) fit of GraphPad
Prism 5 software (GraphPad Software, Sand Diego, CA, USA).

Molecules 2013, 18
15273
3.9. Inhibition of ABCB1 Pump of MDR Mouse Lymphoma Cells (Rhodamine 123 Accumulation Assay)
Inhibition of ABCB1 was evaluated using rhodamine 123, a fluorescent dye, which retention inside
the cells was evaluated by flow cytometry (14). Briefly, 2 × 106 cells/mL were treated with 2 and
20 μM of each compound. After 10 min incubation, rhodamine 123 (Sigma) was added to a final
concentration of 5.2 μM and the samples were incubated at 37 °C in water bath for 20 min. Samples
were centrifuged (2,000 rpm, 2 min) and washed twice with phosphate buffer saline (PBS, Sigma). The
final samples were re-suspended in 0.5 mL PBS and its fluorescence measured with a Partec CyFlow flow
cytometer (Partec, Münster, Germany). Verapamil (Sanofi-Synthelabo, Budapest, Hungary) at 20.4 μM
was used as positive control.
3.10. Combination Assays
The combined activity of doxorubicin (Teva, Budapest, Hungary) and the ecdysteroids was determined
using the checkerboard microplate method, as described before [7]. Briefly, 5 × 104 cells/well were
incubated with doxorubicin and the compound to be tested for 48 h at 37 °C under 5% CO2. Cell
viability rate was determined through MTT staining, as described above. The interaction was evaluated
using the CompuSyn software (CompuSyn Inc., Paramus, NJ, USA) at each constant ratio of
compound vs. doxorubicin (M/M), and combination index (CI) values were obtained for 50%, 75%,
and 90% of growth inhibition.
4. Conclusions
In the present study, we have prepared 32 semi-synthetic derivatives of 20-hydroxyecdysone,
following our previously observed structure-activity relationships on the strong synergistic activity of
ecdysteroid dioxolanes with doxorubicin on a murine MDR cancer cell line expressing the human
ABCB1 transporter. By utilizing the different reactivity of the 2,3 and 20,22 vicinal diol moieties,
various bis-homo- and bis-hetero-dioxolanes were synthesized, as well as several 20,22- and two
2,3-monodioxolane derivatives. In addition to these, two epimer pairs were also obtained. Twenty
compounds are reported for the first time; their chemical structures were thoroughly investigated by
comprehensive 1 and 2D-NMR methods, based on which complete signal assignments are provided.
The compounds showed mild to very strong synergistic effects with doxorubicin against the
aforementioned MDR cancer cell line, and the diversity of the substituents allowed us to observe
several new structure-activity relationships. Among these, the importance of the 2,3-dioxolane
substitution and the observations concerning the role of stereochemistry at C-28 and C-29 are the most
interesting results. Apparently, ecdysteroids can be engineered to become strong MDR modulators
only by decreasing the polarity at the A-ring, while the polar side-chain can be kept, providing the
possibility for designing such compounds with a reasonable water solubility and high drug-likeness.
Considering the high importance of the 2,3-dioxolane group in our compounds and the fact that
exactly this part is the most sensitive to an acidic environment, per os application of these compounds
requires an appropriate formulation; development of such delivery systems is currently in process,
investigation on their activity against MDR cancer xenografts is going to be reported in the near future.

Molecules 2013, 18
15274
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge the support from the European Union co-funded by the European Social
Fund (TÁMOP 4.2.2/B-10/1-2010-0012, TÁMOP 4.2.2.A-11/1/KONV-2012-0035) and the Fundação
para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal (PEsT-OE/SAU/UI0074/2011). A. Martins was
supported by the grant SFRH/BPD/81118/2011, FCT, Portugal. The work presented here was
performed within the framework of COST Action CM1106, Chemical Approaches to Targeting Drug
Resistance in Cancer Stem Cells. The authors thank Nikoletta Jedlinszki for the mass spectroscopic
measurements, Imre Ocsovszki, supported by the grant TÁMOP-4.2.1/B-09/KONV-2010-0005, for the
flow cytometry measurements and Ibolya Hevérné Herke for the semi-synthetic preparation and
purification of compounds 17–20.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
1. Karlson, P. Mode of Action of Ecdysones. In Invertebrate Endocrinology and Hormonal
Heterophylly; Burdette, W.B., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1974; pp. 43–54.
2. Zeleny, J.; Havelka, J.; Sláma, K. Hormonally mediated insect-plant relationships: Arthropod
populations associated with ecdysteroid-containing plant, Leuzea carthamoides (Asteraceae).
Eur J. Entomol. 1997, 94, 183–198.
3. Dinan, L. A strategy for the identification of ecdysteroid receptor agonists and antagonists from
plants. Eur. J. Entomol. 1995, 92, 271–283.
4. Tóth, N.; Hunyadi, A.; Báthori, M.; Zádor, E. Phytoecdysteroids and vitamin D analogues—
Similarities in structure and mode of action. Curr. Med. Chem. 2010, 17, 1974–1994.
5. Báthori, M.; Tóth, N.; Hunyadi, A.; Márki, Á.; Zádor, E. Phytoecdysteroids and anabolic-androgenic
steroids. Structure and effects on humans. Curr. Med. Chem. 2008, 15, 75–91.
6. Dinan, L. The Karlson lecture. Phytoecdysteroids: What use are they? Arch. Insect Biochem.
Physiol. 2009, 72, 126–141.
7. Martins, A.; Tóth, N.; Ványolós, A.; Béni, Z.; Zupkó, I.; Molnár, J.; Báthori, M.; Hunyadi, A.
Significant activity of ecdysteroids on the resistance to doxorubicin in mammalian cancer cells
expressing the human ABCB1 transporter J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 5034–5043.
8. Möllmann, H.; Rohdewald, P.; Schmidt, E.W.; Salomon, V.; Derendorf, H. Pharmacokinetics of
triamcinolone acetonide and its phosphate ester. Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 1985, 29, 85–89.
1
9. Balázs, A.; Hunyadi, A.; Csábi, J.; Jedlinszki, N.; Martins, A.; Simon, A.; Tóth, G. H- and
13C-NMR investigation of 20-hydroxyecdysone dioxolane derivatives, a novel group of MDR
modulator agents. Magn. Reson. Chem. 2013, 51, 830−836.
10. Chou, T.-C. Theoretical basis, experimental design, and computerized simulation of synergism
and antagonism in drug combination studies. Pharmacol. Rev. 2006, 58, 621−681.

Molecules 2013, 18
15275
11. Pastan, I.; Gottesman, M.M.; Ueda, K.; Lovelace, E.; Rutherford, A.V.; Willingham, M.C.
A retrovirus carrying an MDR1 cDNA confers multidrug resistance and polarized expression of
P-glycoprotein in MDCK cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1988, 85, 4486−4490.
12. Choi, K.; Frommel, T.O.; Stern, R.K.; Perez, C.F.; Kriegler, M.; Tsuruo, T.; Roninson, I.B.
Multidrug resistance after retroviral transfer of the human MDR1 gene correlates with
P-glycoprotein density in the plasma membrane and is not affected by cytotoxic selection.
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1991, 88, 7386−7390.
13. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Application to
proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Methods 1983, 65, 55−63.
Sample Availability: Samples of the compounds 1–33 are available from the authors.
© 2013 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article
distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license
(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).