Hydrogen Evolution in Dye/TiO2/Pt Hybrid Systems
FULL PAPER
aqueous sodium bicarbonate and then dried over Na2SO4. After removal
of the solvent under reduced pressure, silica-gel column chromatography
of the residue gave
(s, 4H, CH2), 4.39 (s, 2H, CH2), 3.44 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.41 (s, 9H, CH3);
HRMS (FAB) calcd for C35H35NO5S2: 613.1957; found: 613.1950 [M]+;
elemental analysis (%) calcd for C35H35NO5S2: C 68.49, H 5.75, N 2.28;
found: C 68.41, H 5.73, N 2.27.
1
(R1 =R2 =CH2OCH3). Yield: 0.91 g (81%).
1H NMR (CDCl3): d=7.00 (s, 2H, ArH), 5.67 (s, 1H, CH), 4.42 (s, 2H,
CH2), 4.33 (s, 2H, CH2), 3.72 (d, 2H, CH2), 3.60 (d, 2H, CH2), 3.35 (s,
6H, CH3), 1.26 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.76 (s, 3H, CH3); HRMS (FAB) calcd for
C18H23BrO4S2: 446.0221; found: 446.0220 [M]+; elemental analysis (%)
calcd for C18H23BrO4S2: C 48.32, H 5.18; found: C 48.29, H 5.16.
(E)-3-(5’-{4-[N,N-Bis(4-methoxymethylphenyl)amino]phenyl}-4,4’-bis(me-
thoxymethyl)-2,2’-bithiophen-5-yl)-2-cyanoacrylic acid (MO4D): This
compound was prepared by a procedure similar to that used for PD. The
product MO4D was obtained as a red powder. Yield: 0.21 g (75%).
1H NMR ([D6]DMSO): d=8.08 (s, 1H, =CH), 7.42 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.37 (d,
2H, ArH), 7.34 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.24 (d, 4H, ArH), 7.02 (d, 4H, ArH), 6.94
(d, 2H, ArH), 4.47 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.32 (s, 6H, CH2), 3.27 (s, 6H, CH3),
3.25 (s, 6H, CH3); HRMS (FAB) calcd for C38H36N2O6S2: 680.2015;
found: 680.2009 [M]+; elemental analysis (%) calcd for C38H36N2O6S2: C
67.04, H 5.33, N 4.11; found: C 67.00, H 5.31, N 4.10.
2-[5’-(5,5-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-2-yl)-4,4’-bis(methoxymethyl)-2,2’-bithio-
phen-5-yl]-4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (2, R2 =CH3OCH2): A
2.5m solution of n-BuLi in hexane (0.8 mL, 1.98 mmol) was added to a
solution of 1 (R2 =CH3OCH2; (0.9 g, 1.8 mmol) in THF (10 mL) at
ꢀ788C, and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. After adding 2-isopropoxy-
4,4,5,5-tetramethyl-1,3,2-dioxaborolane (0.41 mL, 1.98 mmol) to the mix-
ture, the solution was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 12 h.
After quenching with H2O followed by extraction with dichloromethane,
the combined dichloromethane layer was washed with aqueous sodium
bicarbonate and dried over MgSO4. After removal of the solvent under
reduced pressure, silica-gel column chromatography of the residue with
ethyl acetate/hexane (1:3) as eluent gave 2 (R2 =CH3OCH2). Yield:
0.67 g (76%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): d=7.29 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.12 (s, 1H,
ArH), 5.70 (s, 1H, CH), 4.64 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.46 (s, 2H, CH2), 3.75 (d,
2H, CH2), 3.63 (d, 2H, CH2), 3.38 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.36 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.56
(s, 3H, CH3), 1.33 (s, 12H, CH3), 0.79 (s, 3H, CH3); HRMS (FAB) calcd
for C24H35BO6S2: 494.1968; found: 494.1965 [M]+; elemental analysis (%)
calcd for C24H35BO6S2: C 58.30, H 7.13; found: C 58.27, H 7.11.
Preparation of Dye/TiO2/Pt: Surface-platinized TiO2 particles (TiO2/Pt,
0.3–1 wt% Pt loading) were prepared by a photodeposition method as
described elsewhere.[31] Commercially available anatase TiO2 particles
(Hombikat UV-100, primary particle size <10 nm, BET surface area
>250 m2 gꢀ1) were used after washing with distilled water or after ultra-
sonic treatment of the washed TiO2 in water. The particles were collected
by filtration or by centrifugation and then dried in an oven under N2. A
water suspension of the TiO2 particles (0.5 gLꢀ1) containing ꢁ1m metha-
nol and 0.03–0.1 mm chloroplatinic acid was irradiated with a 200 W mer-
cury lamp for 30 min. After irradiation, the Pt-loaded TiO2 powders were
separated by centrifugation, washed with distilled water, dried, and
stored under N2 in the dark. The Pt-loaded TiO2 powders (0.1 g) were
dispersed in an acetonitrile/tert-butanol solution of the organic dyes (1.0–
100 mmol) and stirred overnight. The dye-loaded photocatalysts (Dye/
TiO2/Pt) were separated by centrifugation, washed with acetonitrile/tert-
butanol, dried in an oven (858C), and stored under N2 in the dark.
4-[5’-(5,5-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-2-yl)-4,4’-bis(methoxymethyl)-2,2’-bithio-
phen-5-yl]benzenamine (3, R2 =CH3OCH2): Compound
2
(R2 =
CH3OCH2; 0.65 g, 1.31 mmol), potassium carbonate (0.72 g, 5.24 mmol),
and water (3 mL) were added to a stirred solution of 4-bromoaniline
(0.22 g, 1.31 mmol) and [PdACHTNUTRGNEUNG(PPh3)4] (45 mg, 0.04 mmol) in THF (10 mL).
The mixture was refluxed for 12 h, cooled to room temperature, extract-
ed with dichloromethane, and dried over anhydrous MgSO4. After re-
moval of the solvent under reduced pressure, flash chromatography of
the residue over silica gel with ethyl acetate/hexane (1:2) as eluent gave
3 (R2 =CH3OCH2) as a yellow powder. Yield: 0.45 g (75%). 1H NMR
(CDCl3): d=7.29 (d, 2H, ArH), 7.17 (s, 1H, ArH), 7.05 (s, 1H, ArH),
6.72 (s, 2H, ArH), 5.71 (s, 1H, CH), 4.46 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.35 (s, 2H, CH2),
3.78 (s, 2H, NH2), 3.76 (d, 2H, CH2), 3.64 (d, 2H, CH2), 3.38 (s, 3H,
CH3), 3.37 (s, 3H, CH3), 1.56 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.80 (s, 3H, CH3); HRMS
(FAB) calcd for C24H29NO4S2: 459.1538; found: 459.1533 [M]+; elemental
analysis (%) calcd for C24H29NO4S2: C 62.72, H 6.36, N 3.05; found: C
62.69, H 6.34, N 3.04.
Photocatalyzed hydrogen evolution: Aqueous suspensions (3 mL) of
Dye/TiO2/Pt particles (10 mg) containing EDTA (ꢁ5 mm) were placed in
a quartz cell and adjusted to pH 3 with 1n HClO4, bubbled with an N2
stream for 30 min, sealed with a septum, and then irradiated with stirring
by a xenon lamp (450 W, model 66924, Newport corporation); the inci-
dent light (l>420 nm) was obtained by passing the light from the xenon
lamp through a 10 cm water layer and a cutoff glass filter. The amounts
of H2 evolved were determined by gas chromatography (HP6890A GC
equipped with a TCD detector) on a 5 ꢃ molecular sieve column. Appa-
rent quantum yield F(H2) for H2 generation was determined for the
MOD/TiO2/Pt suspensions, a band-pass filter (415–450 nm) was used to
isolate the 436 nm light from the emission light of a high-pressure mercu-
ry lamp (1000 W, model 6171, Newport Corporation), and the incident
light flux was determined by using a 0.2m ferrioxalate actinometer solu-
tion.[47]
4-[5’-(5,5-Dimethyl-1,3-dioxan-2-yl)-4,4’-bis(methoxymethyl)-2,2’-bithio-
phen-5-yl]-N,N-bis[4-(methoxymethyl)phenyl]benzenamine (4, R1 =R2 =
CH3OCH2): A toluene solution (10 mL) containing a mixture of 1-
bromo-4-(methoxymethyl)benzene (0.50 g, 2.5 mmol), 3 (R2 =CH3OCH2)
(0.44 g, 0.95 mmol), [Pd2ACHTNUGTRNEUNG(dba)3] (52 mg, 3 mol%), Xantphos (33 mg,
Theoretical methods: DFT calculations for energetically stabilized molec-
ular orientations of MOD and PD adsorbed on the (101) facet of anatase
TiO2 were performed by changing the angle of the molecular plane with
respect to the TiO2 surface by using the VASP code with the generalized
gradient approximation (GGA), periodic boundary condition, plane
wave basis sets, and projector augmented wave (PAW) ultrasoft pseudo-
potentials.[48] The electronic wave functions of the model structures were
represented by plane wave basis with a cutoff energy of 400 eV. The size
of the unit cell for an isolated dye was 15.83ꢁ4.28ꢁ21.08 ꢃ. The TiO2
surface structure was modeled for three layers with 144 atoms (48 Ti
atoms and 96 O atoms), in which one TiO2 layer consists of one titanium
layer and two oxygen layers. The size of unit cell was 10.18ꢁ15.08ꢁ
9.32 ꢃ. DFT calculations of the dyes adsorbed on TiO2 surface were per-
formed with a much larger super cell of size 10.18ꢁ15.08ꢁ42.00 ꢃ and
with two different initial geometric positions of the dyes. For the energet-
ically favorable structures obtained by structure optimization calculation,
the dye molecular plane was subsequently inclined on the fixed TiO2 sur-
face in 108 steps to 908 to both the right- and left-hand sides. All total en-
ergies at each angle were measured and the most stable case was found
when the dyes have a specific angle on the TiO2 surface.
3 mol%), and NaOtBu (0.64 g, 6.65 mmol) was stirred under N2 at 1108C
for 12 h, hydrolyzed with water, extracted with dichloromethane, and
dried over MgSO4. After removal of the solvent under reduced pressure,
silica-gel column chromatography of the residue with ethyl acetate/
hexane (1:4) as eluent gave 4 (R1 =R2 =CH3OCH2) as a yellow oil.
Yield: 0.45 g (68%). 1H NMR (CDCl3): d=7.33 (d, 2H, ArH), 7.25 (d,
2H, ArH), 7.19 (s, 2H, ArH), 7.05–7.13 (m, 8H, ArH), 5.71 (s, 1H, CH),
4.47 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.41 (s, 4H, CH2), 4.38 (s, 2H, CH2), 3.76 (d, 2H,
CH2), 3.64 (d, 2H, CH2), 3.42 (s, 6H, CH3), 3.39 (s, 3H, CH3), 3.37 (s,
3H, CH3), 1.56 (s, 3H, CH3), 0.79 (s, 3H, CH3); HRMS (FAB) calcd for
C40H45NO6S2: 699.2688; found: 699.2681 [M]+; elemental analysis (%)
calcd for C40H45NO6S2: C 68.64, H 6.48, N 2.00; found: C 68.60, H 6.46,
N 2.01.
5’-{4-[N,N-Bis(4-methoxymethylphenyl)amino]phenyl}-4,4’-bis(methoxy-
methyl)-2,2’-bithiophene-5-carbaldehyde (5, R1 =R2 =CH3OCH2): This
compound was prepared from 4 (R1 =R2 =CH3OCH2) by a procedure
similar to that used for 5 (R1 =CH3CH2CH2, R2 =H). The product 5
(R1 =R2 =CH3OCH2) was obtained as a yellow oil. Yield: 0.28 g (71%).
1H NMR (CDCl3): d=10.01 (s, 1H, COH), 7.31–7.37 (m, 4H, ArH),
7.22–7.27 (m, 4H, ArH), 7.05–7.12 (m, 6H, ArH), 4.73 (s, 2H, CH2), 4.40
Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 15368 – 15381
ꢀ 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim
15379