ChemComm
Communication
performance of PC and PE, ascribed to low host–guest energy transfer
efficiencies and worse quenching effects due to increased collisional
probability between T1 exciton and other particles. The latter was
evidenced by a significant decrease in the nonexponential decay time
of FIrpic doped in DPESPOPhCz3 and DPEPOPhCz2 films (8%),
compared with their analogues (Fig. S8, ESI†).
In summary, the influence of the T1 excited state extension in host
materials on their EL performance was investigated through a series of
APO hosts with the same building blocks to get rid of the interferences
from other structural factors. DPESPOPhCz with the carbazolyl-
localized T1 state endowed its blue PHOLEDs with favourable EL
performance, with an E.Q.E. more than 13% and well-controlled
efficiency reduction. It was seen that the T1 state extension remarkably
reduced the EL efficiencies and worsened the efficiency roll-offs due
to the resulting lower T1 energy level and the increased probability of
collisional quenching effects, indicating the significance of the T1 state
location when designing high-energy-gap host materials.
CH, LZ and FZ contributed equally to this work. This project was
financially supported by NSFC (61176020 and 51373050), New Century
Excellent Talents Supporting Program of MOE (NCET-12-0706), Pro-
gram for Innovative Research Team in University (MOE) (IRT-1237),
New Key Project of MOE (212039) and New Century Excellent Talents
Developing Program of Heilongjiang Province (1252-NCET-005).
Notes and references
1 W. Huang, B. Mi and Z. Gao, Organic Electronics, Science Press,
Beijing, 2011.
Fig. 3 Brightness–current density (J)–voltage curves (a) and efficiency vs.
luminance characteristics of PA–PE (b).
2 C. W. Tang and S. A. VanSlyke, Appl. Phys. Lett., 1987, 51, 913–915.
3 J. H. Burroughes, D. D. C. Bradley, A. R. Brown, R. N. Marks,
K. Mackay, R. H. Friend, P. L. Burns and A. B. Holmes, Nature,
1990, 347, 539–541.
4 J. Kido, M. Kimura and K. Nagai, Science, 1995, 267, 1332–1334.
5 M. A. McCarthy, B. Liu, E. P. Donoghue, I. Kravchenko, D. Y. Kim,
F. So and A. G. Rinzler, Science, 2011, 332, 570–573.
6 S. Reineke, F. Lindner, G. Schwartz, N. Seidler, K. Walzer, B. Lussem
and K. Leo, Nature, 2009, 459, 234–238.
7 G. M. Farinola and R. Ragni, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 3467–3482.
8 X.-H. Zhu, J. Peng, Y. Cao and J. Roncali, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40,
3509–3524.
9 L. Xiao, Z. Chen, B. Qu, J. Luo, S. Kong, Q. Gong and J. Kido,
Adv. Mater., 2011, 23, 926–952.
However, at the practical luminance, the driving voltages were
gradually increased, especially for PC and PE. Obviously, because of
the similar volt–ampere characteristics of these devices, the remark-
ably higher driving voltages of PC and PE can be ascribed to the less
efficient exciton confinement on FIrpic through energy transfer from
DPESPOPhCz3 and DPEPOPhCz2 rather than the carrier injection
and transportation.
The efficiency curves of these devices directly evidenced the
influence of the T1 excited state extension on exciton harvesting
(Fig. 3b). DPESPOPhCz endowed PA with the highest efficiencies with
32.0 cd AÀ1 for current efficiency (C.E.), 25.1 lm WÀ1 for power
efficiency (P.E.) and 13.6% for external quantum efficiency (E.Q.E.)
10 Y. Tao, C. Yang and J. Qin, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2011, 40, 2943–2970.
11 D. Hu, F. Shen, H. Liu, P. Lu, Y. Lv, D. Liu and Y. Ma, Chem.
Commun., 2012, 48, 3015–3017.
among these devices, which were favourable among the best results of 12 C. S. Oh, C. W. Lee and J. Y. Lee, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 3875–3877.
13 E. Mondal, W.-Y. Hung, H.-C. Dai and K.-T. Wong, Adv. Funct.
Mater., 2013, 23, 3096–3105.
14 K. S. Yook and J. Y. Lee, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 3169–3190.
FIrpic-based devices reported so far (Table S2, ESI†). Significantly, PA
showed an extremely low efficiency roll-off along with the increase in
luminance, which were negligible for C.E. and E.Q.E. and only 3% for 15 W. Yang, Z. Zhang, C. Han, Z. Zhang, H. Xu, P. Yan, Y. Zhao and
P.E. at 100 cd mÀ2 and as low as 11, 37 and 11% for C.E., P.E. and
S. Liu, Chem. Commun., 2013, 49, 2822–2824.
16 S. O. Jeon and J. Y. Lee, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 4233–4243.
17 D. Yu, F. Zhao, C. Han, H. Xu, J. Li, Z. Zhang, Z. Deng, D. Ma and
E.Q.E., respectively, at 1000 cd mÀ2. Although PB achieved the highest
P.E. of 27.7 lm WÀ1, its C.E. and E.Q.E. were lower than those of PA,
accompanied with the much less efficiency roll-offs at high lumi-
nance. It was noticeable that compared with PA, the maximum
efficiencies of PC were dramatically reduced B25%, while its effi-
ciency roll-offs were as much as 23, 48 and 23% at 100 cd mÀ2 and 34,
68 and 36% at 1000 cd mÀ2, respectively. The situation for PD and PE
was similar that the maximum efficiencies of PD were almost 4 times
of those of PE, accompanied with the much less efficiency roll-offs.
Obviously, the T1 state extension of DPESPOPhCz3 and DPEPOPhCz2
should be one of the main reasons for the much worse EL
P. Yan, Adv. Mater., 2012, 24, 509–514.
18 C. Han, Z. Zhang, H. Xu, J. Li, G. Xie, R. Chen, Y. Zhao and
W. Huang, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2012, 51, 10104–10108.
19 C. Han, Z. Zhang, H. Xu, S. Yue, J. Li, P. Yan, Z. Deng, Y. Zhao, P. Yan
and S. Liu, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2012, 134, 19179–19188.
20 H. Sasabe, Y.-J. Pu, K. Nakayama and J. Kido, Chem. Commun., 2009,
6655–6657.
21 S. Gong, X. He, Y. Chen, Z. Jiang, C. Zhong, D. Ma, J. Qin and
C. Yang, J. Mater. Chem., 2012, 22, 2894–2899.
22 Z. Zhang, Z. Zhang, R. Chen, J. Jia, C. Han, C. Zheng, H. Xu, D. Yu,
Y. Zhao, P. Yan, S. Liu and W. Huang, Chem.–Eur. J., 2013, 19, 9549–9561.
23 S. Tokito, T. Iijima, Y. Suzuri, H. Kita, T. Tsuzuki and F. Sato,
Appl. Phys. Lett., 2003, 83, 569–571.
2672 | Chem. Commun., 2014, 50, 2670--2672
This journal is ©The Royal Society of Chemistry 2014