Y. Shi et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 45 (2004) 3703–3706
3705
6-nitroacridine than 9-amino-6-chloro-2-methoxyacri-
dine (pKa ¼ 8:8 vs 10.5). It is also noteworthy that
DNA1–1n is even more active than DNA1–3n, which
involves a flexible tetramethylene linker. In order to
link highly acidic 9-amino-2-methoxy-6-nitroacridine to
sequence-recognizing DNA1, rather rigid linker 1 is
superior to flexible linker 3, since it firmly fixes the
acridine to a suitable position for the acid catalysis.
When 9-amino-6-chloro-2-methoxyacridine is bound to
DNA1, however, flexible linker 3 is more favorable than
linkers 1 and 2. Thus, DNA1–3c (kobs ¼ 4:4 ꢀ 10ꢁ2 hꢁ1
)
is twice as active as DNA1–1c (2.3 · 10ꢁ2 hꢁ1), and four
times as active as DNA1–2c (0.95 · 10ꢁ2 hꢁ1). Assum-
ably, this acridine is less acidic so that the major factor
for the site-selective RNA activation is the conforma-
tional change of RNA backbone due to the intercala-
tion, rather than its acid catalysis. This ‘conformational
catalysis’ is never optimized when the acridine is placed
appropriately for the acid catalysis. Accordingly, rigid
linkers 1 and 2 are not very effective here.
Figure 2. Site-selective RNA scission by Lu(III) in the presence of
DNA–acridine conjugates. Lane 1, Lu(III) only; lane 2, DNA1–1n;
lane 3, DNA1–1c; lane 4, DNA1–2n; lane 5, DNA1–2c; lane 6, DNA1–3n;
lane 7, DNA1–3c. At pH8.0 and 37ꢁC for 2h; [RNA1]¼ 5lM; [DNA1–
X] ¼ 10 lM; [Lu(III)] ¼ 100 lM; [Tris–HCl] ¼ 10 mM; [NaCl] ¼ 200 mM.
R, RNA1 only; H, alkaline hydrolysis; T1, RNase T1 digestion; B,
control reaction in the buffer solution.
Furthermore, the stereochemistry of the branching car-
bon atom in the linker portions must be precisely con-
trolled. Thus, DNA1–1n (derived from
2.5 times as active as DNA1–2n (from
L
-threoninol) is
-threoninol),
D
50-side of U19 was selectively and efficiently hydrolyzed
(lanes 2–7). For all the conjugates, the scission band is
notably stronger than the corresponding band in the
random cleavage of RNA1 in lane 1. Apparently, RNA1
is selectively activated just in front of the acridine resi-
due in the conjugates.14
while DNA1–1c is also more active than DNA1–2c. The
stereochemistry of this carbon greatly affects the posi-
tion of acridine in the DNA/RNA heteroduplexes, giv-
ing rise to the difference in the RNA-activating ability.
Consistently, the circular dichroism induced on the
acridine in the middle portion of DNA1–1n/RNA1
duplex is notably different from that for the DNA1–2n/
RNA1 duplex (data not shown). As expected, the length
of linker is also crucially important. Thus, DNA1–4,
The pseudo-first-order rate constants (kobs) of the scis-
sion at the 50-side of U19 in the presence of the DNA–
acridine conjugates are presented in Figure 3. The
conjugate DNA1–1n is remarkably active for the site-
selective RNA scission (kobs ¼ 11:0 ꢀ 10ꢁ2 hꢁ1). Here,
9-amino-2-methoxy-6-nitroacridine is bound to DNA1,
using the linker 1 that possesses amide-based and rather
rigid side chain. This conjugate is 4.8 times as active as
DNA1–1c bearing 9-amino-6-chloro-2-methoxyacridine
through the same linker. Similarly, DNA1–2n
(kobs ¼ 4:4 ꢀ 10ꢁ2 hꢁ1) is 4.6-fold more active than
DNA1–2c. These differences in the ability for RNA
activation (and thus for the resultant RNA scission) are
ascribed to the stronger acidity of 9-amino-2-methoxy-
which is derived from L-threoninol but has a shorter
side chain, shows only one-third ability of DNA1–1c.
In conclusion, a quite efficient RNA activator has been
synthesized by attaching 9-amino-2-methoxy-6-nitro-
acridine into the middle of oligonucleotide through
chiral linker derived from L-threoninol. Precise design of
both acridine and linker is crucially important here.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by Bio-oriented
Technology Research Advancement Institution. The
support by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from
the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, Culture and
Technology, Japan is also acknowledged.
References and notes
1. Komiyama, M.; Sumaoka, J.; Kuzuya, A.; Yamamoto, Y.
Methods Enzymol. 2001, 341, 455–468.
2. Cowan, J. A. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2001, 5, 634–642.
3. Trawick, B. N.; Daniher, A. T.; Bashkin, J. K. Chem. Rev.
1998, 98, 939–960.
Figure 3. Dependence of RNA-activating ability of DNA–acridine
conjugate on the structure of linker.