Scheme 3. Intramolecular CꢀS Cross-Couplinga
Scheme 4. Intramolecular CꢀS Coupling with Thioacetatesa
a Reaction conducted on 1 mmol scale, and the isolated product yield
is shown. b 2,20-Bipyridine (60 mol %) as a ligand was employed instead
of ethyl crotonate (EC).
a Reaction conducted on 1 mmol scale, and the isolated product yield
is shown. b The isolated yield of 3i is 35% when K2CO3 (1.5 equiv) as an
extra base was employed. The isolated yield of 3b is 92% at rt when
c
NiCl2 (10 mol %) and 2,20-bipyridine (20 mol %) were employed.
other electron-rich and -deficient phenyl iodides bearing
(OMe, OH) and (F, CF3, COMe, CO2Et) groups, respec-
tively, also worked well with either aryl or alkyl thiols
(Scheme 2b), affording the corresponding cross-coupling
products (1pꢀ1r and 1uꢀ1w) in 59%ꢀ87% yields. Both
hindered o-iodoanisole and o-iodophenol also furnished
the desired thioethers 1s and 1t in good yields. Notably, the
present method provided a complementary approach for
the synthesis of 2-(phenylthio)phenols, which had already
been obtained through Cu(I)-catalyzed tandem transfor-
mation of CꢀS coupling/CꢀH oxidation by Pan.13
addition15a or alkylation15b,c of thiols, to the core of two
drugs, diltiazem and thiazesim. This catalytic system was
also applicable in the efficient construction of 1,5-benzox-
athiepines such as 3g. Finally, two addional 1,4-benzox-
athiine products 3h and 3i bearing either an electron-
donating OMe group or electron-withdrawing CO2Me
group were also demonstrated.
The direct use of thiols has some drawbacks such as a
foul smell and sensitivity of oxidation to disulfides. Thioa-
cetate, asa superior surrogateover other sulfur sourcesdue
to ease of its installation and cleavage, has been applied in
the CꢀS coupling but only to a limited extent in the
intermolecular reactions with base.16 We surmised that
the intramolecular counterpart would be plausible. Grat-
ifyingly, cyclization of thioacetate 40 derived from 4-bro-
moindole (vide infra; see SI for preparation) proceeded
smoothly under standard Ni(0)-mediated conditions ex-
cept in the replacement of EC by 2,20-bipyridine as a
ligand, and the desired tricyclic thioether 5 with some
strain could be isolated in 66% yield (Scheme 4, eq 1).
Other examples were demonstrated in the cyclizations of
thioacetates 2a0 and 2i0 (eqs 2 and 3), affording the
corresponding thioethers in comparable or even better
yields considering this essential two-step (deprotection
and coupling) transformation. The unmasked thiol could
be detected during the course of reaction; however, intro-
duction of an extra base (e.g., K2CO3) in order to facilitate
release of thiol led to the decreased yield of thioether (e.g.,
3i) instead, suggesting the mild nature imparted from this
unique system. Notably, the above method worked
even better on a gram-scale reaction with only 5 mol %
Ni(0) catalyst as demonstrated in the case of 2b0 (eq 4),
indicating that this protocol would be practically
valuable.
Extension of the above intermolecular CꢀS cross-cou-
plings to a less explored intramolecular version was then
explored. The needed cyclization precursors 2 could be
prepared conveniently according to procedures described
in the SI. As shown in Scheme 3, two 1,4-benzothiazines (3a
and 3b) can be obtained in high yields through intramole-
cular CꢀS coupling. More challenging 1,5-benzothiazepine,
a valuable structural unit in the pharmaceutical industry as
aforementioned, also can be obtained in moderate yield, as
exemplified in the case of 3c, whose structure was confirmed
by the X-ray diffraction of its single crystal.14 Two addi-
tional 1,5-benzothiazepines 3d and 3e bearing CF3 and
CO2Me groups on the benzene ring respectively were pre-
pared in useful yields as well, indicating that the present
CꢀS coupling is more efficient for the construction of a
seven-membered ring than that by our previous CꢀC
coupling.8 Notably, the access to 1,5-benzothiazepine-
4(5H)-one 3f is feasible albeit in moderate yield, and this
intramolecular CꢀS cross-coupling strategy provides a new
approach which complements those based on Michael
(13) (a) Xu, R.; Wan, J.-P.; Mao, H.; Pan, Y. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010,
132, 15531. (b) (Additions and Corrections) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133,
387.
(14) See the CIF file in the Supporting Information for more details.
(15) (a) Ogawa, T.; Kumagai, N.; Shibasaki, M. Angew. Chem., Int.
Ed. 2012, 51, 8551. (b) Choudary, B. M.; Chowdari, N. S.; Madhi, S.;
Kantam, M. L. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 1736. (c) Watson, K. G.; Fung,
Y. M.; Gredley, M.; Bird, G. J.; Jackson, W. R.; Gountzos, H.; Mattews,
B. R. J. Chem. Soc., Chem. Commun. 1990, 1018.
(16) (a) Wager, K. M.; Daniels, M. H. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4052. (b)
Park, N.; Park, K.; Jang, M.; Lee, S. J. Org. Chem. 2011, 76, 4371.
Org. Lett., Vol. XX, No. XX, XXXX
C