Organic Letters
Letter
and even when stored in glass vessels. These observations belie
the frequent incorporation of fluorine in organic molecules to
inhibit reactivity at specific sites, for example, to slow drug
metabolism.10 Separately, benzylic monofluorides have been
shown to undergo nucleophilic substitution in the presence of
acids or hydrogen-bond donors.8,9 These insights suggest that
monofluorination of benzylic C−H bonds is not a compelling
end goal for many substrates. On the other hand, they suggest
that benzyl fluorides could serve as strategic intermediates in a
sequential approach to benzylic C−H functionalization.
Efforts to explore sequential C−H fluorination/functional-
ization were initiated by testing hexafluoroisopropanol (HFIP,
10 equiv) as a hydrogen bond donor to activate the benzyl
fluoride (Scheme 3).9f Initial results demonstrated conversion
of benzyl fluorides to benzyl alcohols by including water as a
nucleophile in the reaction mixture (25−27). Formation of 25
shows that hydrogen-bond activation supports displacement of
the fluoride, even in the presence of a primary alkyl bromide.
This fluorination/water-substitution sequence to access
benzylic alcohols is noteworthy because C−H oxygenation
strategies will typically proceed directly to ketones, reflecting
the higher reactivity of alcohols relative to C−H bonds.13
Analogous efforts were effective for the formation of benzylic
ethers and esters (28−36). For less nucleophilic alcohols, like
tert-butyl alcohol, more forcing conditions were needed to
form the product, using BF3·OEt2 as a Lewis acid catalyst (28
and 33).9i This approach also enabled reactivity with alcohols
bearing Boc-pyrrolidine or pyridine substituents (31 and 32).
These results expand the scope of accessible products relative
to the recently reported method for direct Cu/NFSI-catalyzed
benzylic etherification,3a which shows limited compatibility
with basic heterocycles, such as pyridines, and Boc-protected
pyrrolidines. Carboxylic acids were also effective coupling
partners (34−36). These substrates have innate acidity, but
the reactions were more effective with HFIP or BF3 additives.
The presence of allylic and benzylic C−H bonds in the
carboxylic acids used to prepare 34 and 36 would likely
complicate direct C−H carboxylation methods with these
partners.
Scheme 2. Cu/NFSI Fluorination of Benzylic C−H Bonds
a
b
1H or 19F NMR yields, CH2Br2 or PhCF3 as internal standard. 35
c
°C, 0.5 equiv of MeB(OH)2. 55 °C, 1 mol % of Cu/1.2 mol % of
BPhen, 4 equiv of NFSI, 1 equiv of B2pin2 instead of MeB(OH)2. 75
d
°C, 1 mol % of Cu/1.2 mol % of BPhen, 4 equiv of NFSI, 1 equiv of
e
B2pin2 instead of MeB(OH)2. Acetone solvent.
We then targeted C−N coupling reactions. Direct C−H
amidation reactions typically feature primary sulfonamides or
other stabilized ammonia surrogates capable of generating
nitrenoid intermediates.14 Few precedents exist for oxidative
coupling of C−H bonds with carbamates or secondary
sulfonamides.4b,15 tert-Butyl carbamate itself proved to be an
effective coupling partner when using BF3·Et2O to activate the
benzyl fluoride (37). Then a range of secondary sulfonamides
were shown to undergo effective displacement of the benzyl
fluoride, with BF3·Et2O as an activator (38−43). The good
reactivity with less nucleophilic, but more readily deprotected,
nosylamides is noteworthy. Competitive Friedel−Crafts
reactivity with chlorobenzene was observed in some of these
reactions, but this complication was resolved by using
dichloromethane as the solvent for the fluorination step
(40−43).
The observation of Friedel−Crafts reactivity highlights
opportunities for coupling with electron-rich arenes and
other carbon nucleophiles that would not be compatible with
a direct Cu/NFSI-catalyzed C−H coupling reaction. Such
reactivity was demonstrated with phenols (44−46), N-sulfonyl
indole (47, 48), and a silyl enol ether and allyl silane (49, 50).
Each of the reactions highlighted above proceeds via a
straightforward two-step protocol, without isolation of the
modification of the conditions, including use of 4 equiv of
NFSI, replacement of MeB(OH)2 with B2pin2 as the reductant,
and operating at 55 °C, led to a 50% yield of the desired
product 2. The modified conditions, either at 55 or 75 °C, also
proved effective with other electron-deficient substrates (2, 4,
5, 6, 9, 13, 17, and 19), while the original conditions were
favored for more reactive substrates (3, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, and
14). The latter group also includes celestolide, which
underwent fluorination in 86% yield (18), and substrates
with tertiary C−H bonds, leading to 23 and 24 in 92% and
84% yields. Overoxidation to ketone- or styrene-derived side
products was observed with more activated C−H substrates,
necessitating the identification of milder conditions (35 °C, 0.5
equiv of MeB(OH)2). These conditions allowed several benzyl
fluorides to be obtained in good yield (15, 16, and 20),
including a bromochroman derivative. Methylarenes appear to
favor C−H sulfonimidation rather than fluorination, as
observed by the formation of 21 and 22. A collection of
other less successful substrates is provided in Table S9 of the
Supporting Information, but overall, these results show that the
catalytic conditions may be tuned to access good fluorination
reactivity for a broad range of benzylic C−H substrates.12
Complications were encountered during product isolation.
Many of the products decomposed in the presence of silica gel,
B
Org. Lett. XXXX, XXX, XXX−XXX