Microwave-Assisted Functionalization of Phosphinic Acids: Amidations versus Esterifications 99
(CDCl3) δ: 20.5 (3J = 12.1, C3–CH3), 24.9 (C3’), 25.2
the molecules were optimized by the PM6 method
(C4’), 33.1 (1J = 82.2, C5), 36.0 (1J = 85.7, C2), 36.1
(3J = 4.0, C2’), 49.9 (C1’), 120.5 (2J = 9.7, C4), 136.4
(2J = 15.2, C3); 1H NMR (CDCl3) δ: 1.76 (s, C3–CH3),
overlapped by 1.02–2.00 (m, 5 × CH2) total intensity
13H, 2.15–2.60 (m, 5H, NH, 2 × PCH2), 2.94–3.14 (m,
implemented in MOPAC2009 [11]. The preopti-
mized structures were optimized by the B3LYP/6-
31++G(d,p) method. The calculations were per-
formed in the gas phase by Gaussian ‘03 [12]. The
reactant and products had only positive frequencies
in the normal coordinate analysis with the harmonic
oscillator model. The transition states were found by
the QST2 method. One and only one frequency was
found to be imaginary. In the thermochemical cal-
culations, the scale factor was 1.
1H, NH), 5.48 (d, J = 37.1, 1H, CH); [M + H]+
found
= 214.1369, C11H21NOP requires 214.1361.
1-Benzylamino-3-methyl-3-phospholene 1-oxide
(2c). Yield: 76%; 31P NMR (CDCl3) δ: 63.5; 13C NMR
(CDCl3) δ: 20.5 (3J = 12.1, C3–CH3), 32.2 (1J = 81.8,
C5), 35.0 (1J = 85.3, C2), 44.2 (NCH2), 120.6 (2J =
9.8, C4), 127.3 (C2’*, C4’), 128.5 (C3’)*, 136.6 (2J =
15.3, C3), 139.6 (3J = 5.8, C1’), * may be reversed; 1H
NMR (CDCl3) δ: 1.76 (s, 3H, C3–CH3), 2.18–2.62 (m,
4H, 2×PCH2), 3.01–3.16 (m, 1H, NH), 4.08–4.20 (m,
2H, NHCH2), 5.51 (d, J = 33.6, 1H, CH), 7.22–7.38
REFERENCES
[1] Edmundson, R. S. In Comprehensive Organic Chem-
istry; Barton, D.; Ollis D.; Sutherland, I. O. (Eds.);
Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1979; Vol. 2, Ch. 10.5, p.
1291.
[2] Quin, L.D. A Guide to Organophosphorus Chemistry;
Wiley: New York, 2000.
(m, 5H, Ar); [M + H]+
= 222.1051, C12H17NOP
found
requires 222.1048.
[3] Hopkins, T. R.; Vogel, P. W. J Am Chem Soc 1956,
78, 4447–4450.
[4] Kiss, N. Z.; Luda´nyi, K.; Drahos, L.; Keglevich, G.
Synth Commun 2009, 39, 2392–2404.
[5] Keglevich, G.; Ba´lint, E.; Kiss, N. Z.; Jablonkai, E.;
Hegedu˝s, L.; Gru¨n, A.; Greiner, I. Curr Org Chem
2011, 15, 1802–1810.
General Procedure for the MW-Assisted
Amidation of
1-Hydroxy-3-methyl-3-phospholene 1-oxide 1
and 1-Hydroxyphospholane 1-oxides 4 and 5
A mixture of 0.10 g of the phosphinic acid (1: 0.76
mmol, 4: 0.75 mmol, 5: 0.68 mmol) and 11.3 mmol
of the primary amine (n-hexylamine: 1.5 mL, c-
hexylamine: 1.3 mL, benzylamine: 1.2 mL) was mea-
sured in a sealed tube and irradiated in the MW re-
actor equipped with a pressure controller at 220◦C
for 2 h. (The pressure developed was in the range of
ca. 7 bar) Then, the excess of amine was removed
under reduced pressure and the residue was puri-
fied by flash chromatography. Amides 2a–c, 6, and
7 were formed in conversions of 30–36%, in purities
of 95–97%.
[6] Keglevich, G.; Kiss, N. Z.; Mucsi, Z.; Ko¨rtve´lyesi, T.
Org Biomol Chem 2012, 10, 2011–2018.
[7] Kranjc, K.; Kocˇevar, M. Curr Org Chem 2010, 14,
1050–1074.
´
[8] Keglevich, G.; Kova´cs, A.; To˝ke, L.; Ujsza´szy, K.;
Argay, G.; Czugler, M.; Ka´lma´n, A. Heteroatom Chem
1993, 4, 329–335.
[9] Eyring, H. J Chem Phys 1935, 3, 107–115.
[10] Gilbert, K. E. PCMODEL, Version 7.0; Serena Soft-
ware: Bloomington, IN.
[11] Stewart, J. J. P. J Mol Mod 2007, 13, 1173–1213.
[12] Frisch, M.J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria,
G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery,
J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.;
Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone,
V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.;
Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.;
Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.;
Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene,
M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.;
Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R.
E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.;
Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth,
G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V.
G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas,
O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.;
Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.;
Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.;
Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R.
L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C.
Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.;
Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.;
Pople, J. A. Gaussian 03, Revision B. 05; Gaussian:
Pittsburgh, PA, 2003.
Phosphinic
Amide
Yield (%) 31P NMR (CDCl3) δ [M + H]+
found
2a
2b
2c
6
26
25
29
24
62.5
60.3
62.9
216.1522
214.1368
222.1053
224.1209
66.1 (50%) and
66.2 (50%)
59.0 (60%), 65.3
(30%), and 64.8
(10%)
7
22
238.1367
Theoretical Calculations
The structures for the reactants, products, and TSs
were built up by PCMODEL [10]. The geometries of
Heteroatom Chemistry DOI 10.1002/hc