K. K. Childers et al. / Tetrahedron Letters 54 (2013) 2506–2510
2509
Table 1 (continued)
Entry
Aldehyde
Product
Isolated yield (%)
O
NH2
N
S
O
H
18
14b
H2N
CH3
32
33
CH3
O
H
NH2
N
S
O
19
0b
H2N
a
1 equiv aldehyde, 1 equiv 2-amino-2-cyanoacetamide, 1 equiv S8, 1 equiv 1-methyl morpholine, 0.5 M DMF, 72 h at 100 °C.
1 equiv aldehyde, 1 equiv 2-amino-2-cyanoacetamide, 1–1.2 equiv S8, 1 equiv 1-methyl imidazole, 0.5 M 1:1 toluene/NMP, overnight at 80–130 °C.
1 equiv aldehyde, 1 equiv 2-amino-2-cyanoacetamide, 1 equiv S8, 1 equiv 1-methyl imidazole, 0.5 M DMF, 24 h at 100 °C.
b
c
we found the thiazole synthesis of 34 and 35 afforded comparable
yields to 22 and 25 (Fig. 1).13
NH2
NH2
N
S
In summary, we have developed a novel and convenient multi-
component reaction for the synthesis of fully substituted thiazoles.
A key difference between this reaction and the Gewald reaction in
terms of practical application is the commercial availability of the
starting materials: the Gewald aldehyde needs to have a methy-
lene group adjacent to the carbonyl, thus limiting the number of
building blocks readily available for the synthesis of thiophenes,
while any aldehyde can in theory be used for the synthesis of thi-
azoles. Commercially available starting materials and a one-pot
procedure allow for rapid incorporation of alkyl, aryl, and hetero-
aryl functionality into a scaffold of both synthetic and medicinal
chemistry interest.
O
O
Cl
Cl
S
H2N
H2N
22
34
44% yield
28% yield
NH2
NH2
N
S
O
O
S
OH
OH
H2N
H2N
35
25
8% yield
11% yield
Typical experimental procedure: A solution of p-tolualdehyde
Figure 1. Comparison of Gewald and thiazole-forming reaction.
(0.24 mL,
2.0 mmol),
2-amido-2-cyanoacetamide
(200 mg,
2.0 mmol), sulfur (65 mg, 2.0 mmol), 1-methylimidazole (0.16 mL,
2.0 mmol) and a 1:1 mixture of toluene:N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone
(4 mL, 0.5 M) were stirred at 130 °C for 25 h and then cooled to room
temperature. The reaction mixture was diluted with ethyl acetate
(30 mL), washed with water (2 Â 10 mL) and brine, dried over anhy-
drous sodium sulfate, filtered, and concentrated under reduced
pressure. The residue was purified by column chromatography on
silica (20–70% ethyl acetate/hexanes) to afford 5-amino-2-(p-
tolyl)thiazole-4-carboxamide (190 mg, 0.81 mmol, 40% yield) as a
dark yellow solid.
aldehydes. The aldehyde was combined with an equimolar amount
of 2-amino-2-cyanoacetamide and sulfur, and a variety of bases
were screened for their efficacy in promoting the desired transfor-
mation.10 1-Methylimidazole provided the cleanest conversion to
product while stronger bases (pKa >8) were noticeably worse. A
variety of solvents were also investigated11 with a 1:1 mixture of
toluene/NMP affording the best yields, presumably due to the rea-
sonable solubility of elemental sulfur under these conditions.
A number of other factors were examined to further enhance
starting material conversion and reaction yields, although to lim-
ited effect. For example, since the first step in the reaction se-
quence is a condensation, sodium sulfate was introduced into the
reaction mixture as a dehydrating agent; this modification did
not change the yield. Varying the concentration of each reactant
individually as well as in combination with other reactants simi-
larly did not lead to any improvements. Due to the fast paced nat-
ure of a medicinal chemistry program, limited studies were
completed to understand the low yields and any possible byprod-
uct pathways. Further studies could be warranted. In the end, the
best conditions were identified as equimolar concentrations of
aldehyde, 2-amino-2-cyanoacetamide, S8, and 1-methylimidazole
in 1:1 toluene/NMP overnight at a concentration of 0.5 M and a
temperature of 80–130 °C.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Maria Emilia DiFrancesco for
helpful discussions.
Supplementary data
Supplementary data (NMR data for compounds) associated with
References and notes
1. Wilson, K.; De Almeida, G.; Haidle, A.; Konrad, K.; Machacek, M.; Zabierek, A.
Preparation of thiophenecarboxamides as inhibitors of Janus kinases (JAK)
javascript, WO 2010005841A1, January 14, 2010.
2. Gewald, K.; Schinke, E.; Böttcher, H. Chem. Ber. 1966, 99, 94–100.
3. Feroci, M.; Chiarotto, I.; Rossi, L.; Insei, A. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2008, 350, 2740–
2746.
4. Huang, Y.; Doemling, A. Mol. Divers. 2011, 15, 3–33.
5. Tinsely, J. M. In Name Reactions in Heterocyclic Chemistry; Li, J. J., Corey, E. J.,
Eds.; Wiley: New York, 2005; pp 193–198.
With these conditions in hand,12 the scope of the methodology
was explored. As seen in Table 1, aryl (entries 5–14, 17–18) and
heteroaryl aldehydes (entries 15–16) provided the best yields.
Alkyl aldehydes (entries 1 and 2) gave similar yields while a reac-
tion with an
a,b-unsaturated aldehyde (entry 19) afforded no
desired product. In direct comparisons to the Gewald reaction,