Please do not adjust margins
New Journal of Chemistry
Page 3 of 5
DOI: 10.1039/C8NJ01145A
Journal Name
COMMUNICATION
I
radical B to the terminal alkyne (3) takes place chemoselectively to
form the vinyl sulfone radicals C and D. Subsequently, sulfonyl
iodide (A), molecular iodine, or iodine radical may approach the
vinyl sulfone radical D more readily than vinyl sulfone radical C to
avoid a steric repulsion from the sulfonyl group to provide the
desired βꢀiodovinyl sulfone (4).
H2O, 40 oC, 3 h
O
S
NH2
NH
O
2
Ar2
S
+
I2
+
Ar
O
4
O
3
2a
1a
Conclusions
An efficient, molecular iodineꢀpromoted MCR of alkynes and
sulfonyl hydrazide for the synthesis of (E)ꢀβꢀiodo vinylsulfone
derivatives has been developed. The developed protocol provides an
alternative and highly attractive route to various (E)ꢀβꢀiodo
vinylsulfones from the simple and readily available starting materials,
and especially it avoids the use of any transitionꢀmetal catalyst, and
toxic or potentially dangerous oxidants. Further studies regarding the
scope and synthetic applications of this reaction are being pursued in
our laboratory and will be reported in due course.
[a] Reaction conditions: unless otherwise noted, all reactions were performed
with 1a (1.0 equiv.), 2a (2.0 equiv.), and 3 (1.1 equiv.) in 5 mL of H2O at 40
°C for 3 h; [b] Isolated yield.
Experimental Section
A mixture of sulfonyl hydrazides (0.27 mmol), alkyne (0.30 mmol),
and iodine (0.54 mmol) in water (3.0 mL) was placed in a test tube
equipped with a magnetic stirring bar. The reaction mixture was
stirred at 40 °C for 3h. After the reaction was completed, the mixture
was quenched by the addition of satd aq Na2S2O3 (8 mL). Further
stirring was followed by extraction with ethyl acetate (3 × 10 mL).
The organic phase was separated, washed with brine, dried (MgSO4),
filtered, and concentrated in vacuo to give the crude product, which
was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with a mixture
Scheme 3. Control experiments
To get an insight into the mechanism of the sulfonylation process,
controlled experiments were conducted. Radical trapping experiment
was conducted to elucidate whether the reaction involves radical
species. When the radical scavenger (2,2,6,6ꢀtetramethylꢀ
piperidinyloxy, TEMPO) was employed under standard conditions,
the reaction was inhibited in less than 10% yield, which indicated
that a radical pathway should be involved (Scheme 3, Eq 1).
Subsequently, according to Liu’s work[10], when a pꢀtoluenesulfinic
acid sodium salt was used as the substrate instead of 1a under the
standard conditions, the reaction proceeded with a 78% yield
(Scheme 3, Eq. 2), indicating that the sulfinate radical maybe an
intermediate in this process.
of ethyl acetate/petroleum (1:10, v/v) to afford the desired product 4
.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Program for Innovative Research Team of the
Ministry of Education and Program for Liaoning Innovative
Research Team in University (IRT1073) for financial support.
Notes and references
[1] Q. Guan, M. Y. Jiang, J. H. Wu, Y. P. Zhai, Y. Wu, K. Bao, W.
G. Zhang, Green Chem., 2016, 18, 5794–5799.
[2] (a) A. B. Cuenca, R. Shishido, H. Ito, E. Fernandez, Chem. Soc.
Rev., 2017, 46, 415–430; (b) S. Roscales, A. G. Csaky, Chem.
Soc. Rev., 2014, 43, 8215–8225; (c) B. Wang, L. Tang, L. Y Liu,
Y. N. Li, Y. Yang, Z. Y. Wang, Green Chem., 2017, 19, 5794–
5799.
[3] (a) A. Kumar, M. Kumar, M. K. Gupta, Green Chem., 2012, 14,
2677–2681; (b) Y. Yang, L. Tang, S. Zhang, X. F. Guo, Z. G.
Zha, Z. Y. Wang, Green Chem., 2014, 16, 4106–4109; (c) Ch. B.
Rao, B. Chinnababu, Y. Venkateswarlu, J. Org. Chem., 2009, 74,
8856–8858.
[4] (a) A. Dhakshinamoorthy, A. M. Asiri, H. Garcia, Chem.
Commun., 2014, 50, 12800–12814; (b) M. O. Simon, C. J. Li,
Chem. Soc. Rev., 2012, 41, 1415–1427.
[5] (a) R. Chawla, R. Kapoor, A. K. Singh, L. D. S. Yadav, Green
Chem., 2012, 14, 1308–1313; (b) C.ꢀH. Shen, L. Li, W. Zhang, S.
Liu, C. Shu, Y. E. Xie, Y. F. Yu, L. W. Ye, J. Org. Chem., 2014,
79, 9313–9318; (c) Y. Wang, C. Zhou, R. Wang, Green Chem.,
2015, 17, 3910–3915; (d) P. SaiPrathima, K. Srinivas, M. Mohan
Rao, Green Chem., 2015, 17, 2339–2343; (e) L. E. Heim, N. E.
Schlörer, J. H. Choi, M. H. G. Prechtl, Nat. Commun., 2014, 5,
3621.
[6] (a) J. P. Palmer, D. Rasnick, J. L. Klaus, D. Bromme, J. Med.
Chem. 1995, 38, 3193–3197; (b) D. C. Meadows, T. Sanchez, N.
Neamati, T. W. North, J. GervayꢀHugue, Bioorg. Med. Chem.,
2007, 15, 1127–1130; (c) R. Ettari, E. Nizi, M. E. D. Francesco,
Scheme 4. Plausible reaction mechanism
On the basis of control experiment results and previous reports[2ꢀ5,
16], a possible mechanism for the crossꢀcoupling reaction is proposed
in Scheme 4. The sulfonyl hydrazide (1) reacts with iodine (2a) to
give a sulfonyl iodide intermediate (A) that could undergo homolytic
cleavage to yield a sulfonyl radical B. Addition of the sulfonyl
This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 20xx
J. Name., 2013, 00, 1-3 | 3
Please do not adjust margins