ring.8 Few other studies revealed the access to C3 mono- or
difluorinated indole derivatives. The syntheses of
3-substituted 3-fluorooxindoles,9 3,3-difluoroindoles
or indolines,10 or trans-2,3-difluoro-2,3-dihydroindoles,
monofluoroindole derivatives, or monofluoroindolines11
have been described in the presence of NFSI, DAST, and
Selectfluor. To the best of our knowledge, the synthesis of
2-substituted 3-fluoroindoles has not been previously de-
scribed. Our continuing interest in the synthesis of indole
derivatives by one-pot processes12 and in the formation of
carbonꢀheteroatom bonds via Au-catalyzed π-activation
of alkynes13 prompted us to investigate an alternative ap-
proach to 3,3-difluoro-2-arylindolines 3 with better flexibility
starting from unprotected o-alkynylanilines 1. Moreover, we
explored the extension of the procedure toward the unprece-
dented synthesis of 3-fluoro-2-aryl-indoles 2 (Scheme 1). We
wish to report herein our preliminary results.
First, the readily available 2-[[4-(methoxy)phenyl]ethynyl]-
aniline 1a was chosen as a model substrate and Selectfluor as
a source of electrophilic fluorine to carry out the desired
cyclizationꢀfluorination sequence. Indeed, Selectfluor has
shown very interesting activity in the Au-catalyzed amino-
fluorination of alkynes to prepare fluorinated pyrrolidines14
and pyrazoles.15,16
The results of Table 1 show that the reaction of 1a with
an excess of Selectfluor and water in CH3CN at room
temperature in the absence of any catalyst failed to give the
Scheme 1
desired C3 fluorinated indole derivatives ruling out their
formation by a direct electrophilic fluorocyclization pro-
cess14,17 (Table 1, entry 1). Under these conditions, a fast
degradationof thestarting N-unprotected2-alkynylaniline
1a was observed. When the same reaction was carried out
in the presence of Ph3PAuNTf218 (10 mol % of the com-
mercially available dimeric form), the formation of the
difluorinated indoline 2a was observed although in a
modest 35% yield (Table 1, entry 2). Subsequently, various
parameters such as solvents19 and the amount of water10b,20
were screened to improve the reaction efficiency. The
presence of a larger amount of water, e.g., 100 equiv
(Table 1, entry 3), led to a decrease of the yield as it may
speed up the protodeauration of indolylgold intermediate
species(42% of thecorresponding2-substitutedindolewas
detected). Ethanol has proven to be the best choice for the
reaction among solvents screened so far (MeCN, dioxane,
and acetone, Table 1, entries 3ꢀ6). Satisfyingly, the yield
of 3a was increased to 75% by using EtOH as the reaction
medium (Table 1, entry 4). By contrast with the results
observed in the gold(I)-catalyzed tandem aminofluorina-
tion of 1-phenyl-2-(4-phenylbut-3-yn-2-ylidene)hydrazine
to give the corresponding fluorinated pyrazole, the addi-
tion of base to the reaction mixture resulted detrimental
(7) Lee, J. H.; Kim, Y. G.; Cho, M. H.; Kim, J. A.; Lee, J. FEMS
Microbiol. Lett. 2012, 329, 36–44.
(8) Schlosser, M.; Ginanneschi, A.; Leroux, F. Eur. J. Org. Chem.
2006, 2956–2969 and references cited therein.
(9) For examples of 3-substituted 3-fluorooxindoles, see: (a) Seki, T.;
Fujiwara, T.; Takeuchi, Y. J. Fluorine Chem. 2011, 132, 181–185. (b)
Fujiwara, T.; Seki, T.; Miura, M.; Takeuchi, Y. Heterocycles 2009, 79,
427–432. (c) Fujiwara, T.; Yin, B.; Jin, M.; Kirk, K. L.; Takeuchi, Y.
J. Fluorine Chem. 2008, 129, 829–835. (d) Ishimaru, T.; Shibata, N.;
Horikawa, T.; Yasuda, N.; Nakamura, S.; Toru, T.; Shiro, M. Angew.
Chem., Int. Ed. 2008, 47, 4157–4161.
(10) (a) Torres, J. C.; Garden, S. J.; Pinto, A. C.; da Silva, F. S. Q.;
Boechat, N. Tetrahedron 1999, 55, 1881–1892. (b) Lin, R.; Ding, S.; Shi,
Z.; Jiao, N. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 4498–4501.
16
and we failed to obtain 3a under the presence of NaHCO3
Other gold catalysts such as AuCl, AuCl3, and NaAuCl4
(Table 1, entries 7ꢀ9) were tested and allowed the formation
of 2a in 38ꢀ56%. In addition, it was found that other
transition-metal catalysts such as PdCl2, PtCl2,CuCl2 2H2O,
3
RuCl3 2H2O, or AgNTf2 were ineffective. Although less
effective in the model study, we selected the cheaper
NaAuCl4 2H2O catalyst that previously, in our hands,
3
(11) Yin, B.; Wang, L.; Inagi, S.; Fuchigami, T. Tetrahedron 2010, 66,
6820–6825.
3
(12) (a) Arcadi, A.; Cacchi, S.; Fabrizi, G.; Goggiamani, A.; Iazzetti, A.;
Marinelli, F. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 545–548. (b) Abbiati, G.;
Arcadi, A.; Chiarini, M.; Marinelli, F.; Pietropaolo, E.; Rossi, E. Org.
Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 7801–7808. (c) Arcadi, A.; Chiarini, M.; Marinelli,
F.; Picchini, S. Synthesis 2011, 4084–4090 and references cited therein.
allowed a mild and green procedure for the synthesis of
indoles from 2-alkynylanilines17 and explored the Au(III)-
catalyzed cyclization of 2-alkynylanilines combined in a
one-pot procedure with the C3 fluorination of the in situ
formed 2-substituted indole by Selectfluor.
A one-pot procedure was used with the aim of accomplish-
ing efficiently the process and avoiding the use of time- and
resource-consuming workup and purification procedures.21
Alkynes 1were converted into the corresponding 2-substituted
indoles in EtOH at room temperature by using 5 mol %
^
(13) (a) Antoniotti, S.; Genin, E.; Michelet, V.; Genet, J.-P. J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 2005, 127, 9976–9977. (b) Genin, E.; Toullec, P. Y.; Antoniotti, S.;
^
Brancour, C.; Genet, J.-P.; Michelet, V. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 3112–
3113. (c) Genin, E.; Toullec, P.-Y.; Marie, P.; Antoniotti, S.; Brancour, C.;
^
Genet, J.-P.; Michelet, V. ARKIVOC 2007, 5, 67–78. (d) Neatu, F.; Li, Z.;
^
Richards, R.; Toullec, P. Y.; Genet, J.-P.; Dumbuya, K.; Gottfried, J. M.;
^
€
Steinruck, H.-P.; Parvulescu, V. I.; Michelet, V. Chem.;Eur. J. 2008, 14,
^
9412–9418. (e) Toullec, P. Y.; Genin, E.; Antoniotti, S.; Genet, J.-P.;
^
Michelet, V. Synlett 2008, 707–711. (f) Nea-tu, F.; Parvulescu, V. I.; Michelet,
^
V.; Genet, J.-P.; Goguet, A.; Hardacre, C. New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 102–106.
^
(g) Nea-tu, F.; Toullec, P. Y.; Michelet, V.; Parvulescu, V. I. Pure Appl. Chem.
of NaAuCl4 2H2O. Selectfluor (3 equiv) was then added
3
2009, 81, 2387–2396. (h) Tomas-Mendivil, E.; Toullec, P. Y.; Diez, J.;
Conejero, S.; Michelet, V.; Cadierno, V. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 2520–2523.
(17) Arcadi, A.; Bianchi, G.; Marinelli, F. Synthesis 2004, 610–619.
(18) Mezailles, N.; Ricard, L.; Gagosz, F. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4133–
4137.
ꢁ
(14) Simonneau, A.; Garcia, P.; Goddard, J. P.; Mouries-Mansuy,
V.; Malacria, M.; Fensterbank, L. Beilstein J. Org. Chem. 2011, 7, 1379–
1386.
ꢀ
(19) Nyfeller, P. T.; Duron, S. G.; Burkart, M. D.; Vincent, S. P.;
(15) Quian, J.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, J.; Jiang, B.; Xu, Z. Org. Lett. 2011, 13,
4220–4223.
(16) For a recent review on transition metal-catalyzed general fluor-
ination reactions, see: Liu, G. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012, 10, 6243–6248
and references cited therein.
Wong, C.-H. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2005, 44, 192–212.
(20) Troegel, B.; Lindel, T. Org. Lett. 2012, 14, 468–471.
(21) Brand, J. P.; Chevalley, C.; Waser, J. Beilstein J. Org. Chem.
2011, 7, 565–569.
Org. Lett., Vol. 15, No. 11, 2013
2767